‘The Kalashnikov age’: Remembering the man behind the AK-47

Colby Cosh on Gen. Mikhail Kalashnikov

by Colby Cosh

Vladimir Vyatkin / Associated Press

Gen. Mikhail Kalashnikov, holder of the Order of Lenin, has left the stage of history at age 94. He departs pursued by considerable odium, for he was the designer of the AK-47, the automatic weapon that has come to dominate the world’s small wars. In 1999, a disarmament expert, Michael Klare, declared that the preceding decade had seen the dawn of “the Kalashnikov age.” Some 70 million AK-47s and knock-offs thereof were then thought to be in circulation around the world, every last one of them simple to use, easy to repair and unbelievably resistant to climate and neglect.

In Africa, to use Klare’s words, “the adolescent male equipped with a Kalashnikov” essentially became the formula for a new weapon of mass destruction. Add grenade launchers to the recipe and you can create serious trouble for a fairly sophisticated state. Add surface-to-air missiles and you can defy a superpower.

Kalashnikov was confronted with the blood guilt for all this woe on many occasions. His answer was always the same: Blame the Germans. I’m a farm kid, Kalashnikov would tell his accusers. (He died in a hospital in Udmurtia, which is just as remote from the familiar, urbane parts of Russia as it sounds.) If not for Hitler and the Wehrmacht, the general would say, I would have happily kept fooling with tractors for the remainder of my days.

Instead, Kalashnikov was drafted; and because he was small, and handy, they made him a tank mechanic; and, before long, he was a tank commander; and then, not long after that, he was a wounded soldier listening to infantry comrades gripe about their crappy rifles. The rest was inspiration and hustle.

The AK-47 did not really go into serious production until 1956, by which time Hitler was no longer on anyone’s list of problems. Kalashnikov’s design was so successful, and exerted such powerful leverage on history, that it might be the only item with a known individual inventor that appears on any national flag (Mozambique’s). Yet if it is thought of as a device by which a Soviet soldier might kill an American one, it has been used for its purpose once, ever: in 1985, when an American intelligence officer sniffing around Russian armour in East Germany was spotted and slain by a grouchy sentry.

Kalashnikov did not split any atoms in designing the AK-47. He put existing components in a super-robust configuration, trading accuracy for reliability. Even a Communist factory could assemble an AK-47 without screwing it up. (Photo hobbyists prize old Soviet camera bodies for analogous reasons.) As a consequence, the AK has been copied everywhere human progress has gotten as far as stamping sheet metal. And it is not as though the little general got rich off royalties. Only after the fall of the Soviet Union was he able to monetize his fame a little, partly through ignominious moves such as flogging Kalashnikov-brand vodka.

This seems too obvious to need mentioning, but it is not the gun, even as an abstraction, that is the odious part of the “child soldiers plus AK-47” formula. (From the leve?e en masse to strategic aerial bombing to 9/11, intellectual progress in war-fighting is often just a matter of someone scratching off an unstated rule of civilized combat.) The secret of the AK-47 amounts to a tightly limited number of cheap parts and loose machining tolerances. It is out, and for good. I am not smart enough about firearms to tell how far some present-day “AK-47s” have strayed from Kalashnikov’s original vision, but I imagine it is pretty far.

I am just smart enough to read actual gun literature when I’m writing about guns (pro tip!), and the Gun Digest Book of the AK & SKS has a funny, instructive chapter on the history of the AK-47 in the U.S.A. Americans aren’t immune to the Kalashnikov’s counter-cultural charm. Their politicians tried to ban the AK-47 by outlawing the import of the “essential” part that made it an automatic weapon, the receiver. Of all the AK-47’s parts, observes author Patrick Sweeney, that one “is by far the easiest to fabricate.” Gun ranges were soon overrun with Kalashnikov hobbyists in Che T-shirts. So the government “wised up” and banned AK-47 barrels. American gunsmiths were fabricating those before the ink was dry on the law.

You can see where this story leads: to the verge of a decentralized, all-American cottage industry in AK-47 manufacture. “The purists will complain that the cosmetic details aren’t correct,” predicts Sweeney. “They’ll get over it,” he adds with undisguised glee, “for we’ll have AKs.”




Browse

‘The Kalashnikov age’: Remembering the man behind the AK-47

  1. Now you can 3D print them in your basement.

    • No, you can’t. Try again.

      • Actually you can now 3D print most things….

        • But not replacement parts for the AK-47 series which are capable of firing bullets from a home 3D printer as you describe. Try again.

          • Not gonna argue with ya…..you can easily see 3D printed guns firing bullets on Google.

          • You might want to take a course in rhetoric. Changing your argument mid-course doesn’t mean your are correct.

          • ‘Now you can 3D print them in your basement.’

            ‘Actually you can now 3D print most things…’

            ‘Not gonna argue with ya…you can easily see 3D printed guns firing bullets on Google.’

            If you can see a ‘change in argument’ in there, you must be sharing Ricky’s vodka. LOL

          • Did you see a 3D printed AK firing?

            For someone who was BS’ing about being in the military, you should know it isn’t possible to ‘print’ an AK.

            You’re BUSTED, yet again…..

          • I’ll tell you what Emily. You 3D print an AK-47 and I’ll supply the 30 rds. of 7.62X39ru. You’ll also have to put 30 downrange in 3 round bursts at a fig 11 target. Just like the good old days when you were in.

          • Like I said, I’m not gonna argue about it. You can 3D print usable guns. Simple as that. It’s a major concern to security. It’s also online.

          • You did imply in your first comment that AK47s can be printed on a 3D printer. I don’t know why as one can purchase them for as little as $10 USD in some jerkwater town in Africa.

          • They can be. Same as toys, shoes, tools….artificial hands, body parts……

            Now that we’ve established what I said in the first place…

          • Sort of. You can make something that’ll fire a bullet with some force, and it might actually do it a coupe of times. However, the materials aren’t robust enough to produce a true replacement for a real firearm, and the commercially available printers don’t have the tolerance needed to produce a good design. I’ve done a bunch of work with 3D printed components lately, and the best materials have a hard time achieving the strength of cast aluminum, let alone gun metal. Tolerances are typically about 0.2 mm by layer, up to 1 mm in plane. Compare that to the <0.02 mm tolerances used in manufacture of real guns.

          • That article is consistent with everything I posted. A little more research would lead you to a number of articles discussing the issues with that device. A short,msomewhat vague article in a general interest publication isn’t a substitute for actual knowledge of gun design, manufacture,materials, and 3D printing.

          • I’m fully genned up on the subject thanks.

            Perhaps it’s you that should do some reading.

          • Right.

          • I don’t understand why but rightwing people seem unable to connect-the-dots, or see a point…..and they get bogged down in details and even patronize others about it.

            Gunsmiths can make guns. Even in their basements given the right equipment….always able to.

            We can now PRINT guns in our basement. Something we couldn’t do just a few years ago.

            I shouldn’t have to go through a pile of posts that say ‘ahhh but no one has printed a shotgun’….or ‘no one has printed a .45′ or no one has printed a .38′……

            We can print guns. Period.

            Everything from here on out is improvement, variation, experiments etc….same as gunsmiths do.

            Only ‘Now you can 3D print them in your basement’

            This shouldn’t have to be explained step-by-step.

          • You are fully befuddled by the subject.

          • Not AK’s, you tool…..

        • See if you can make a brain for yourself.

    • I thoroughly enjoy when you put your ignorance on display for all to see. Keep up the bad work, you make all Liberals look bad.

      • I’m still not a Lib, Rick….but happy new year to ya.

        • You’re still not smart, either….

    • You can 3D print a piece of one. You still need a barrel and action made from steel.

      • Noop.

        • I have not seen one yet, can you show me?

          • LMAO!

            I LOVE it when the trolls post links disproving their own argument!

            That isn’t an AK, you tool.

          • She does that all the time. Her links frequently disprove her own arguments.

          • She’s a one legged gal in an arse-kicking contest.

        • Yup.

          You don’t have a clue as to what you’re talking about, as usual.

          • I second that but i want to read about Kalashnikov then reading all of you make fun of some troll, just ignore the failed abortion

    • Wrong again…..

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *