3

Heroes-Ism


 

I don’t really know what to say about the season premiere of Heroes. Nothing about it — not the episode, not the ratings, certainly not the “countdown” thing — indicated that the show has been redeemed, but nothing about it was that bad, either; it’s just that the novelty has worn off, and it’s hard to watch the show with any confidence that it’s going to take us somewhere interesting. This is the big hazard of a heavily serialized show: since most of the individual episodes aren’t meant to be evaluated on their own, we have to look at them as down payments on the big climax to come. But once a show has proven that it doesn’t know how to deliver a decent climax, it’s hard for the audience to really believe that this is going anywhere. In that sense, Heroes sealed its fate not in season 2 but at the end of season 1, when Tim Kring proved that he wasn’t kidding when he said he didn’t know how to end the season.

Heroes is also an example of how fast trends can change in TV. When it started, ultra-serialization was (thanks to Lost) the cool thing, and everybody wanted to do ongoing mysteries and complicated mythology. Tim Kring had wanted to do serialization on his previous — and best — show, Crossing Jordan, but NBC wouldn’t let him; but by the time of Heroes, Kring and Lost creator Damon Lindelof joined together to celebrate the networks’ newfound acceptance of Total Serialism. Two years later, most shows still have serial elements (the days when every episode’s events were completely forgotten by the next week are gone, even though I think there are some shows, like Chuck, that would actually benefit from that approach), but treating the entire season, or half of a season, as one long unit is no longer something that most shows want to do; the showrunner of Sarah Connor Chronicles announced that this season would be less serialized and have more self-contained episodes. So Heroes‘ approach looked cutting-edge in 2006, and now it just looks kind of confusing.


 
Filed under:

Heroes-Ism

  1. Thanks for the update. Even after the terrible second season, I was tempted to come back to te show. Now I know there is no need.

  2. True, it was the formula from the very start: genesis=generation=regeneration, myth multiplication. They even had to give in and keep some of the characters more than one season, because the fans missed them, now they promise they will keep the nice and the nicely bad… It also has international success programmed with the world map, suppose this will finally decide.

  3. Maybe studio excs need to ask producers that lame question you get in a job interview “Where do you want to be in 5 years.” Had they asked that question, Heroes might be a better show today.

    I know you’re looking at the big picture, but for me the worst thing the series did was allow Claire’s blood to heal anyone, that killed the show, no one can die, no need to fear for your favourite character.

Sign in to comment.