The Get-Together

You may have heard that next season’s Big Bang Theory will feature Leonard (remember him?) and Penny “pursuing a relationship,” which could mean anything from three episodes to a full season. (Big Bang seems to have a habit of making announcements that don’t completely pan out; remember the announcement about this time last year that Sara Gilbert would be a semi-regular in the second season?)

What interests me more is the habit some shows have of clinging to the remnants of their original premise, even when that premise has become irrelevant. Leonard/Penny thing has never worked, but it’s been in the show since the pilot and the writers can’t quite give up on the idea that it’s an important aspect of the show, even though Leonard’s relationship angst continues to provide most of the weakest moments. This is the flipside of the idea that shows often abandon their original concepts: sometimes a show, even a successful one, will keep on trying to milk the original concept even after the audience has moved on. It doesn’t bode particuarly well for hopes that BBT will make the leap from “good” to “great” in its third season.

While I’m on the subject of BBT, the show’s lukewarm Emmy reception — Jim Parsons got nominated, of course, but hardly anyone else did — is interesting because it is sort of a reality-check to the idea that traditional sitcoms are on their way back, at least in terms of the prestige/admiration they get from the industry. BBT is pretty well-respected by insiders, but in a strange reversal for a Chuck Lorre show, it may actually be more popular with critics (particularly younger critics to whom the stripped-down, minimalist storytelling comes as a refreshing change from over-plotted single-camera shows) than with insiders. Penny’s actress, Kaley Cuoco, was probably the most unfortunate Emmy omission; since the Sheldon/Penny relationship is at the heart of what makes the show work, she deserves recognition almost as much as Parsons does, and the very fact that she’s created a likable, reasonably intelligent female character on a Lorre show is achievement enough.




Browse

The Get-Together

  1. I used to enjoy this show but strangely enough, the "stripped-down, minimalist storytelling" only reveals that nothing really happens on this show.

    Leonard's nasally-phrased jokes almost always run flat, Penny doesn't really do anything but react to Sheldon, Rajesh's ethnic shtick is severely character limiting and Howard's oversexed (or is that undersexed?) geek persona is grating and unoriginal. I like Sheldon (his character probably has the most potential) but not enough to see him carry this show.

    Nope…haven't enjoyed this show in a while…

  2. BBT's handling of Leonard and Penny's "relationship" makes me think of the way the folks behind the series NIGHT COURT would remember once or twice every season that Harry and Christine were supposed to be attracted to each other. After months of seeing no hint of that, they'd do an episode that touched on it, then it would be forgotten again

  3. "Leonard/Penny thing has never worked,…"

    Man, you guys really hate this relationship. Personally, it's my favourite part of the show. The show that comes to mind is The Wonder Years. One of the great parts of that show was watching Kevin screw up in relationships. Perhaps BBT would work better if they tried to emulate that feeling, although I'll admit I don't know enough about writing to understand exactly what made those moments on The Wonder Years work so well.

Sign in to comment.