5

         

Subscriber Services:

Customer Service|

Subscribe|

Renew|

Digital Edition|

Back Issues|

Gifts|

2008 University Guide

RSS

 
 

Time to stop the clock?

A backlash against the billable hour has some firms charging flat fees

JOHN INTINI | Feb 20, 2008 | 21:06:28

When news broke last fall that a few New York City lawyers had reached the US$1,000-an-hour mark (that’s US$16.67 a minute), a partner at a major firm in the city warned that the profession may have hit the “vomit point” with clients.

He was right: although the skyrocketing rates lawyers charge have been something of a joke for decades, several large U.S. corporations are no longer laughing. Some clients, it seems, are less willing to accept “open-ended, indefinite and unknowable liabilities when they walk into litigation,” says Lorne Sossin, a law professor at the University of Toronto. Now, to cash in on this discontent, a handful of boutique firms are beginning to offer alternatives to the billable hour, the industry standard since the ’60s.

Charging by the hour—or in six-minute blocks—was originally meant to improve transparency. The problem, says Hugh Totten, a member with Valorem (latin for “value”), a new Chicago-based law firm that offers clients contingency fees (payable only if the result is favourable) and fixed fees, is that the billable hour “creates an incentive for endless litigation and for a complete lack of efficiency.”

This critical refrain isn’t new. In a 2002 report, the American Bar Association’s commission on billable hours blamed hourly quotas for driving young lawyers from the profession (an estimated 45 per cent of lawyers quit law by their third year), and for leaving little time for pro bono work. The commission identified several alternatives. While many private law firms provide options to favoured clients, most lawyers still work on the clock (91 per cent of legal work in Canada is based on billable hours). When asked how quickly firms are shifting from that model, Richard Stock, founding partner of Vancouver-based legal strategist Catalyst Consulting, laughs: “Global warming is faster.”

Continued Below

With little incentive for large firms to change this highly lucrative business model, experts say the push will need to come from clients. Some companies in the U.S. are answering the call. Cisco and Pitney Bowes are two on a short list of corporate giants demanding alternatives, including flat fees. Some companies are refusing to let high-priced junior suits do work that paralegals can do just as well and cheaper. And in November, Wal-Mart circulated a memo to external counsel calling for a freeze on the rate increases of associates—the average entry-level lawyer at a big city firm in the U.S. is making US$160,000 (in Canada it’s closer to $100,000).

Experts anticipate that the current economic downturn will lead to further belt-tightening and could force more companies to reassess deals with their lawyers. “The days of just writing cheques are coming to an end,” says Jay Shepherd, whose Boston firm, Shepherd Law Group, banned billable hours last year and doubled its 2006 revenue. “There is no other business that we don’t know the price of something before we buy it. Imagine getting on an airplane and being told they’re going to charge you by the minute. It’s crazy. Nobody would do it.”

Shepherd, who describes the billable hour as “anti-client,” says the savings his six-lawyer outfit provide is the result of team efficiencies, not cut rates. In addition to flat-fee pricing, his firm offers unlimited advice plans: for a fixed price a client can call the office as often as needed without worrying about a big surprise at month’s end. “It’s almost as if we’re in-house lawyers for them,” he says.

Valorem is also using its small size to its advantage. Instead of having the traditional pyramid model (a stable of junior lawyers working under—and making money for—partners), lawyers at Valorem work together on cases. There isn’t a “bloated associate level,” says Totten. Outsourcing is used to cut costs. And monthly bills include a value-adjustment line, allowing clients to have the final say on price. “We’re not going to argue,” says Totten. A writedown, he says, serves as an early warning sign “that we’re not serving the client well and need to focus on that immediately.” Law, says Totten, “is supposed to be an intimate profession of people giving advice to clients. That’s what we’re trying to get back to.”


Print Article    Send to a Friend    Write a letter to the editor

  Digg this StumbleUpon Stumble It!
  Post to del.icio.us Seed Newsvine
  Share on Facebook See who is linking to this article at Technorati Technorati links

Story from Macleans.ca:

© Rogers Publishing

NAME:
ADDRESS:
 
CITY:
PROVINCE:
POSTAL CODE: (Please omit spaces)
EMAIL:
 








.
Find a Job
Keywords:
Location:





Find out what matters to Canadians each week with Maclean's Storyline e-mail service.

Email Address:


    HOME  |  CANADA  |  WORLD  |  BUSINESS  |   SCIENCE  |  CULTURE  |  EDUCATION  |  BLOGS  |   MULTIMEDIA  |  MACLEAN'S 50  |  COLUMNISTS  |  FORUMS                        Rogers Publishing Limited
ROGERS ProfitGuide.com MoneySense.ca CANADIAN BUSINESS.com
    ADVERTISE | SUBSCRIBE | ABOUT US | PRIVACY POLICY | TERMS OF SERVICE
    IN-CLASS PROGRAMS | INTERNSHIPS | CONTACT

Maclean's is Canada's only national weekly current affairs magazine. Maclean's enlightens, engages and entertains 2.8 million readers with strong investigative reporting and exclusive stories from leading journalists in the fields of international affairs, social issues, national politics, business and culture.