EI premiums freeze: A quick guide - Macleans.ca
 

EI premiums freeze: A quick guide

The numbers and the arguments at a glance


 

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced on Monday morning that the government will freeze the EI premium rate for employees at current levels until the end of 2016.

What it means for your pockets

The EI premium rate will stay at $1.88 per $100 of insurable earnings in 2014 and won’t rise past that for 2015 and 2016. Absent the freeze, the rate would have climbed to $1.93 per $100 in 2014.

Finance Canada notes in its backgrounder on the topic that the rate freeze means a worker earning $48,600 — the cap for insurable earnings next year — will save $24 in 2014.

CBC, however, notes that higher income employees will still be paying higher payroll taxes next year. That’s because the insurable earnings maximum will climb to $48,600 from the current $47,400. Canadians earning the top insurable amount will be paying $22.56 more than this year. Without the rate freeze, though, they would have be paying $46.56 more.

What it means for employers

For a small business employing 10 people earning the maximum insurable amount, the rate freeze translates into a saving of $340 in 2014, Finance Canada said. (Employers generally pay 1.4 times the amount of their employees’ premiums.)

What it means for government coffers

Flaherty has stated the move will leave “$660 million in the pockets of job creators and Canadian workers in 2014 alone.” That means there will be $660 million less next year to fund expenses under the Employment Insurance Act. To put that into perspective, EI benefits paid out to unemployed Canadians in fiscal 2012 amounted to $17.65 billion, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The government says the program can withstand the revenue drop because a) the unemployment rate has been falling and fewer people are applying for benefits. and b) more people working and paying EI premiums.

Flaherty also stressed that the tax freeze will have no impact on the Harper government’s ability to balance the federal budget by 2015. That’s because the EI account “stands by itself,” the minister said. The Globe and Mail, however, notes that: “EI premiums and expenses are listed by Finance Canada as part of overall government revenues and expenses, which can blur the lines between EI funds and government funds. The Liberal government under prime minister Jean Chrétien was accused of raiding the EI fund in order to erase the deficit in the mid-1990s.”

Labour market numbers

Employment numbers have been steadily rising since the end of the recession:

Source: Statistics Canada

And the unemployment rate has been declining:

Source: Statistics Canada

However, the pace of job creation has considerably slowed. Between February and August, the economy produced an average of 12,000 new jobs per month, less than half the 29,000 average of the previous six-month period.

Also, while the labour market churned out 59,000 jobs in August, most of those were part-time gigs, Statistics Canada said last week.

Reactions so far:

The the Canadian Federation of Independent Business is thrilled. The United Steelworkers union much less so. They attribute the reduced number of claimants to Ottawa’s recent limitations on EI eligibility rather than improved job growth.


 

EI premiums freeze: A quick guide

  1. What I am failing to understand is how this is going to promote job growth, as Flaherty said it would during the announcement. Yes it will save working people and companies money, but how does freezing premiums make more jobs? I just don’t see the correlation. I’m all for freezing rates, as people should be encouraged to go and find work (even if their main work is seasonal) but I also think that more has to be done to create job growth. As for the fact that August saw mostly part-time work? Who cares? A job is a job. And if you’re not making anything at the moment, even a few bucks is better than nothing.