Could Alberta pass Quebec to become the second-largest province?

By population? Possibly. By size of economy, it’s pretty much already there.



Most of the facts and figures that come out of Statistics Canada quantify things that have happened in the past—the economy grew by X, crime levels fell by Y and mushroom production rose by Zzzzzzzzz—but the agency grabbed its crystal ball today and looked into the future, to how big Canada’s population might be in 50 years.

As with all guessing games, this one is fraught with uncertainty, subject to assumptions about how many people will immigrate to Canada, where they’ll move to, and who’ll be having the most babies. StatsCan addressed this by establishing seven growth scenarios, with five medium-growth scenarios bracketed by low- and high-growth forecasts. It then applied those scenarios to all the provinces. To give you an idea of the range of possibilities, Canada’s total population, now at around 35.2 million, is expected to rise to anywhere between 40 million and 63.5 million by the year 2063.

When discussing population projections for the individual provinces, the agency restricted its time horizon to 25 years.

Among the findings:

  • The Atlantic provinces aren’t likely to fare well. The population in Newfoundland is likely to drop over the next 25 years. P.E.I. should continue to grow, but most of the growth scenarios StatsCan ran on New Brunswick and Nova Scotia showed the provinces shrinking by 2038.
  • Under every growth scenario, Ontario will remain the country’s largest province, driven largely by immigration.
  • Quebec’s population would grow over the next 25 years under all the scenarios, with most of the gains coming from immigration, but because its rate of growth is almost certain to come in lower than the Canadian average, its demographic weight, or share of the total Canadian population, will slide.
  • Under most scenarios, Alberta’s population will surpass that of British Columbia by 2038. It’ll be the youngest population, too, with the lowest proportion of seniors in the country.

These two last points raise an interesting question: If Alberta could overtake B.C. in population, could it surpass Quebec, Canada’s second-most populated province, too? It’s definitely possible.

This chart is an exercise in cherry-picking growth scenarios. And because StatsCan cut off its provincial forecasts at 2038, there’s some highly unscientific extrapolation involved. But if sluggish Quebec proceeds along a low-growth population trajectory, and Alberta grows at the high-growth rate, Alberta could indeed claim the number 2 population spot in Canada sometime in the early 2050s.


Alberta and Quebec population forecasts

But population growth is one thing. When people talk about provincial rankings, there’s a good chance they’re referring to the size of their economies, as opposed to how many folks live where. It’s certainly the metric any politician boasts about first, come election time. So, to take our Quebec-Alberta match to the next level, here’s another look into the future, this time using 10-year GDP growth rates. Will Alberta’s economy overtake that of Quebec? Barring some pretty massive changes in provincial fates, that could happen as early as 2016, some three decades before Alberta’s population ever catches up to Quebec’s—which pretty much says everything you need to know about how grim the economy is in la belle province.

Alberta and Quebec GDP






Could Alberta pass Quebec to become the second-largest province?

  1. Of course Alberta will overtake Quebec’s economy. Look who’s been running the Quebec Economy for the last 50 years….mainly socialists and seperatists.

    If Alberta didn’t have to fork over Billions each year to support Quebec…..it most likely would have overtaken it much earlier.

    Quebec likes the fact that Alberta is run well, as it compensates for the feckless job Quebecers have been doing.

    • Unless robotics and computer science do almost everything by 2038 and as a result health and service costs for the ageing is only a fraction of what it is today — at least half as much — then we oldsters (I’m 68) can expect a powerful anti-seniors backlash from younger taxpayers; a very serious backlash to not only to dramatically cut services and government pensions and subsidies, but perhaps even a strong call for mandatory euthanasia. It could get that bad.

    • james, you really do need a dictionary.
      “socialists” – are the good guys for Canada.
      “separatists” -are the bad guys for Canada.

      • Rickster,

        Socialists are the bad guys no matter what country they are ruining.

        Technically speaking, if you had a country run by socialists, and a region run by capitalists wanted to seperate to avoid the coming doom……the seperatists would be the good guys.

        In the case of quebec, you get a double whammy.

        the seperatists are for the most part…the socialists. they are however living under the delusion that they can seperate, and still enjoy the payments from the rest of us to maintain their lavish social programs.

        Socialism only works until you run out of other peoples’ money.

        remember that.

  2. Those of us who have seen this coming for quite some time have also been asking for quite some time if our nation’s “leaders” have what it takes to tackle the Constitutional changes that such evolution will require. Trimming the increasingly outsized political clout of Confederation’s bit players, and reducing their ability to impose taxation on other regions via equalization will require a kind of guts, brains, and integrity that’s as rare as good Sasquatch photos.

    • Bill….if you want to fix the finances of a country…it’s simple in theory, but impossible in practice.

      In a nutshell.

      Only people who have worked and paid taxes for the majority of their lives will be allowed to vote. If you are from a family of welfare bums…and are carrying on the tradition…sorry. No vote for you.

      Like I said….it would fix the finances, and make life better for everyone…..but it won’t fly. Many people just don’t get it.

Sign in to comment.