Changes to McGill faculty of medicine admissions pay off

Changes to McGill faculty of medicine admissions pay off

Quebec’s francophone universities should take a page from the controversial changes

McGill University

McGill University

Pity the would-be McGill University medical student.

History and tradition dictate that this person is probably white, well-moneyed and English-speaking. As such, he has had the run of McGill’s medical school for the quasi-entirety of the faculty’s existence. It is the stuff of cliché: One of the most exclusive degrees from one of the country’s best institutions has been the chattel of fathers and sons of rich anglophones, to the exclusion of nearly everyone else. It took a few brave female souls and nearly a century to chip away enough of that hardened privilege so as to allow women entrance into this rarefied club.

Certainly, clichés die hard and loud, as the administration of McGill’s faculty of medicine is once again finding out. In 2009, it made the very sensible decision to at least attempt to recruit from outside this very shallow pool. The faculty’s admissions office changed its name to the admittedly rose-coloured “Admissions, Equity and Diversity of the Faculty of Medicine.” Under its “Towards Health” program, medical students would spread out into the high schools in Montreal’s less fortunate postal codes to promote the medical school. Separately, the faculty dropped the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) from its admissions requirement for an equally sensible reason: The test isn’t offered in French, which is both an oddity and a obstacle in a province where 80 per cent of the population is francophone.

The program seeks only to coax those who would otherwise not consider medicine into the field, and to remove linguistic barriers from the faculty’s admissions process. As a recent Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada study shows, it couldn’t have come too soon. In 2009, 53 per cent of Canadian medical students came from households earning more than $100,000 a year, whereas only 17 per cent of Canadian families fall within this tax bracket.

Only 11 per cent of medical students were from families earning less than $40,000 a year, even though these families represent 44 per cent of the population. The cloistered nature of Canadian medical schools is perhaps best illustrated by a 2002 Canadian Medical Association Journal study, which showed that roughly 16 per cent of medical students have at least one physician parent—a 75-fold greater representation than population share. These figures denote a reigning truism in post-secondary education: Money begets money, privilege begets privilege.

Nevertheless, the reaction was equal parts swift and outraged. “The English community that has supported McGill for 150 years is being stabbed in the back,” Debra Finestone, a McGill professor and emergency room physician whose daughter was recently denied a spot in the school, told the Montreal Gazette. Dr. Finestone provided the most quotable bit of pith-and-vinegar emanating from what the Gazette quaintly called “McGill’s traditional stakeholders,” and epitomized this group’s overriding sense of entitlement. We supported you, so you owe us something—like a spot in your school for my kid. It’s interesting that much of the noise seems to come from physicians associated with McGill whose progeny was similarly rejected. And you thought universities were meant to be a respite from this sort of tribalism.

Thankfully, alumni support and fundraising hasn’t suffered, according to McGill’s office of alumni relations—though some think it should. “Maybe it takes feeling the pinch in its pocketbook for McGill to take notice of the injustice felt by the anglophone community,” wrote one Stella Marshall in a letter to the Gazette. “By seeking diversity as a major criterion guiding admission to its medical school, McGill University seems to have made it virtually impossible for the brightest and most talented anglophone students, seeking a career in medicine, to enter.” (Just for fun, replace “anglophone” with “white” to get a good idea of the ugly implications of this phrase.)

Diversity is a fraught subject, in part because the word itself is a politically correct catch-all that can mean practically anything. In McGill’s case, though, “diversity” is probably best defined by what it doesn’t mean. This isn’t an affirmative action program. There are no racial or linguistic quotas whatsoever. GPA remains as important as ever—more important, actually, as the average new-student GPA has risen from 3.80 to 3.84 since 2010, according to McGill’s own data. If anything, the initiative removes a longstanding de facto affirmation-action program, in place for much of the faculty’s history, in which only rich English types need apply.

What has changed is competition. Thanks to McGill’s initiatives, the number of successful French-only applicants is up by two percentage points, to seven per cent, between 2009 and 2013. The number of bilingual medical students is up six percentage points, to 66 per cent, during the same time period. Meanwhile, the percentage of students from families earning more than $100,000 decreased from 64 to 52 per cent between 2010 and 2013. (All statistics come from the faculty’s admissions office.) Slowly, steadily, McGill’s medical school is starting to resemble the population beyond its walls.

Should Quebec’s francophone universities do the same for English students as McGill has done for French? Yes. Will they? Probably not. But this shouldn’t preclude the university from doing the right thing—or from ignoring those who pine for a continuation of a rich, white, English status quo.

Filed under:

Changes to McGill faculty of medicine admissions pay off

  1. My significant other is a first year med school at McGill, so I know a bit about what is necessary to get in this year.
    The class includes many brilliant people and it would be nearly impossible to find someone who was accepted who doesn’t deserve it.

    If McGill was accepting morons it could be criticized, but the successful students include several people who received awards for having the highest marks in the province.

    I think the only problem is for people like Dr. Finestone who just got a lesson she should have learned long ago: there are people who are smarter, more talented, and dare I say it more humble than she is.

  2. I’m not sure where you got your info about “success”, but the new admissions criteria have seen the failure rate for med students rise to never before seen levels, as would be expected if you plunk 7% of people into classes where they cannot understand the lectures. Also, in a recent article by Karen Seidman of The Gazette, there was a decided decline in donations related to the recent spate of rejections. I see you did also did not mention, in your comment about the rising GPA, that the government AUTOMATICALLY adds .5 to the GPA of rural students applications. So, a 3.8 from Dawson first choice science is the same as a 3.3 from a CEGEP in Ste Agathe. Now, that seems fair, doesn’t it?
    Furthermore, you seem continually amazed that med students come from higher income households. You have trouble grasping that you actually have to be SMART to be a doctor. Average will not cut it, no matter how hard you work. The more time passes, the more information there is to assimilate. Although if sounds crass, smarter people tend to make more money, and also tend to have smarter kids.
    This is not always the case, and in Canada, especially Quebec, where education is dirt cheap, anyone with brains and a desire to work can get ahead. There are plenty of students from lower and/or immigrant households, like mine one generation ago, with brains and drive who are getting ahead. but you shouldn’t penalize those whose families have been here 3 generations just because they have been working hard, contributing to Quebec society and paying taxes for 60 years.
    I won’t say the students who got in do not deserve it, but so do many others who are “disadvantaged” because they are not “disadvantaged”.

  3. Excuse me, but your comment that “Anglophone” somehow equals “white” is misleading. In fact, the Anglophone community in Montreal is extremely diverse; until recently it absorbed nearly all immigrants, including the Jews, Italians, Greeks, Chinese, South Asians, and East Indians (Jamaican and Trinidadian) who came here in the first three quarters of the 20th Century. The Francophone community, by contrast, has remained overwhelmingly white and Catholic, and continues to have difficulty incorporating new arrivals from North Africa and Haiti. The Scottish shipping magnates and WASP bank managers long ago migrated to Toronto, and today’s Anglo-Quebecers are worse-off than mainstream Quebecers in almost every metric, from their lower-than-average family income to their underrepresentation (read: startling and total absence) from the provincial and municipal civil service, provincial companies like Hydro-Quebec, municipal police forces including the SPVM (Montreal Police), and the management positions of local multinationals and banks like Bombardier, SNC Lavallin, and the Caisse Desjardins. Add to this the difficulties English-speaking students face in applying to and attending any of the province’s other medical schools (Université de Montréal and Université Laval), which of course have French as the sole language of instruction, and is it really so unreasonable to question these changes to ensure that this minority retains access to the institutions it founded to serve its own members?