Quebec strikers may cross point of no return

Student groups reject gov’t offers as deadline approaches

Photo by Jacob Serebrin

The student strike in Quebec, ignited by a $1,625 tuition increase over the next five years, is now the longest in provincial history—and participants may soon pass a point of no return.

Professors’ contracts require the semester to end by June 15 and some universities are hinting that the entire semester will be in jeopardy for students who don’t go back in time to meet that deadline.

The Université de Montréal, Quebec’s largest, announced Wednesday that it will extend the term into May for students who have already returned to class.

At the same time, it said it can no longer guarantee students who haven’t returned that they will be able to finish their semesters. Groups representing around 25 per cent of U de M are still on strike.

At the province’s second largest university, Québec à Montréal (UQAM), groups representing around half the student population are still on strike. There, the board of directors has adopted a plan that allows students to return as late as April 16 with the semester ending June 3.

Neither of Quebec’s large English-language universities, Concordia and McGill, plan to extend their semesters. Some of the largest student groups at those schools voted against the strikes.

For CÉGEPs, the deadline is even less flexible. CÉGEP courses must by law be 82 days long. Some CÉGEPs have cancelled some or all summer classes to accommodate an extended term. One of them, Collège de Valleyfield, has told students that they must return to classes on April 12. Strike organizers, meanwhile, say that more than 90,000 CÉGEP students remain on strike.

Dawson College, Quebec’s largest CÉGEP, didn’t strike and won’t extend the semester.

While the number of students boycotting classes has dropped significantly from its peak on March 22 when more than 300,000 students skipped school, student groups representing almost 200,000 members are still striking. Showing a surprisingly united front, Quebec’s three main student lobby groups held a joint press conference on Friday to denounce the province’s latest offer.

In that offer, the Liberals didn’t budge on tuition, but promised to introduce income-based student loan repayment in 2013, guarantee loans for all students whose family income is less than $100,000, and eliminate parental contributions for those from families making under $60,000.

These aren’t entirely novel ideas. The Parti Québécois was quick to jump on the income-based loan repayment plan, saying that the government promised a similar program in 2005 but never followed through. The sovereigntist party has promised to cancel the tuition increases if they’re elected.

But that is likely a long way off. Quebec isn’t required to hold an election until Dec. 2013. In the meantime, students will need to decide whether to go to back to classes or risk their semesters.

Enter the Maclean’s On Campus Contest. Follow us on Twitter. “Like” us on Facebook.

Quebec strikers may cross point of no return

  1. I am very disappointed in the provincial Liberal government in its inability to resolve this situation. It is quite obvious that Québec’s society and students want low tution fees to allow all who want to pursue higher education to continue. Our society needs more highly educated students in order to compete with other economies and to contribute to our prosperity. There are other ways to reduce educational costs, such as eliminating one year at the secondary/Cegep levels, to match what was done in Ontario. There are other ways. All it takes is more courage and imagination.

  2. “Our society needs more highly educated students in order to compete with other economies and to contribute to our prosperity” If these “students” are the future of Quev=bec, the province is screwed.

  3. ” It is quite obvious that Québec’s society and students want low tution fees to allow all who want to pursue higher education to continue. Our society needs more highly educated students in order to compete with other economies and to contribute to our prosperity.”

    Except that their tuition is still ‘low’ even with the increase. Name one other thing you get for ‘free’ as an adult. Housing, food… society benefits from having people who are housed and fed, but still you have to pay to get accommodation and basic food. So why should education be different? How does society benefit from having thousands of graduates take certain courses, such as philosophy, or Latin American studies? Sure, they benefit the individual intellectually, but as a whole, they do not benefit society. Quebec students need to learn that to get something as an adult, you have to give something. That’s responsibility.

Sign in to comment.