Prof charged in Uni shooting said to be odd - Macleans.ca
 

Prof charged in Uni shooting said to be odd

Students issued at least three complaints against accused campus killer


 

Students said they signed a petition and complained to no avail about the classroom conduct of a University of Alabama professor accused of killing three colleagues and wounding three others in a shooting rampage at a faculty meeting.

Related: Shooting rampage in Alabama

The students upset with biology professor Amy Bishop told The Associated Press they went to administrators at the University of Alabama in Huntsville at least three times a year ago, complaining that she was ineffective in the classroom and had odd, unsettling ways. The students said Bishop never made eye contact during conversations, taught by reading out of a textbook and made frequent references to Harvard University, her beloved alma mater. “We could tell something was off, that she was not like other teachers,” said nursing student Caitlin Phillips.

Bishop is charged with one count of capital murder and three counts of attempted murder in the shootings Friday in a campus conference room where members of the biology department were meeting. She is being held without bond and does not yet have an attorney. Police have not revealed a motive, but colleagues say she was vocal in her displeasure about being denied tenure in March of last year. Her appeal was denied in November.

There have been revelations since the shooting that she killed her brother with a shotgun in Braintree, Massachusetts, in 1986 but was never charged because police said it was an accident, and that she and her husband were scrutinized in 1993 after someone sent pipe bombs to a Harvard professor she worked with. The bombs did not go off and no one was ever charged in that case either.

Bishop’s students said they first wrote a letter to biology department chairman Gopi K. Podila–one of the victims of Friday’s shooting–then met with him and finally submitted a petition that dozens of them had signed. “Podila just sort of blew us off,” said Phillips, who was among a group of five students who met with him in fall 2008 or early 2009 to air their concerns.

After students met privately with Podila, Phillips said, Bishop seemingly made a point in class to use some of the same phrases they had so they would know she knew about it. “It was like she was parroting what we had said,” Phillips said.

University President David B. Williams said Tuesday that student evaluations were one of many factors in the tenure evaluation process, but he was unaware of any student petition against Bishop. While other tenured professors in the department made the decision not to grant her what would have amounted to a job for life, Williams said the votes of the tenure committee are not made public. Podila was supportive of her, Williams noted.

Bishop’s husband, James Anderson, said Wednesday the “vast majority” of students were happy with her. He said his wife taught the “cut course” for nursing students, who would either go on toward a degree or quit the program based on how they did in her class. “If they didn’t make it through, they didn’t make it,” he said. “So it’s natural for some to be unhappy.” He said classroom performance was not an issue in her tenure file, which has not been made public.

The Canadian Press.


 

Comments are closed.