Why we should forget Einstein’s tree-climbing fish

Prof. Pettigrew on how the genius truly viewed education

Einstein in 1921 (Ferdinand Schmutzer)

If there is one thing the internet loves, it’s an inspirational quotation from a famous person. In all manner of fonts, with all degrees of accuracy in punctuation, and with all manner of colourful photography, we are exhorted to improve ourselves, to accept ourselves for who we are, to be kind and compassionate to all, and to never take crap from a world full of idiots.

Well, it’s the internet—you can’t expect consistency.

The quotation-based memes often touch on education and intelligence, and among the most ubiquitous is the following remark attributed to Albert Einstein:

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”

It doesn’t take much thought to see why this little gem is so popular—you can see some of the versions here. We all like to imagine that we are all, somewhere deep down, geniuses, and that the only reason we fail in school, or indeed, in life, is that our teachers and bosses can’t see our natural brilliance. We’re fish and those ignorant bastards are making us climb trees!

I dislike this little passage though. For while I would concede that various people have various relative strengths and weaknesses, it’s quite clear to anyone who really looks, that there are a great many people who are not geniuses in anything. They may be better at particular things than others, and perhaps even have a knack for some stuff. But genius? Shakespeare was a genius. Darwin was a genius. To say Uncle Eric is a genius because he can reach the green on the fourth fairway with a 7 iron—well that just debases the term.

But worse, lines like the supposed Einstein quote above reinforce an idea that is actually quite dangerous to education generally: the idea that some people are just good at some things are some are not. This notion is anathema to education because the whole notion of learning is that you can, well, learn things. Contrary to popular belief, you don’t have to have a special “math brain” to be able to understand the Pythagorean Theorem. And you don’t have to be “good at English” to be able to write a decent analysis of Death of a Salesman.

You just have to work hard and learn how to do it.

Of course, some have preferences and aptitudes for certain things, and a small minority of people have genuine cognitive impairments.  But the fish/tree analogy implies that for most, if not all people, there are many intellectual endeavours are simply, innately, impossible for them.

So Einstein was wrong about fish and trees and genius? Not exactly.

You see, as far as anyone can tell, Einstein never said it.

As the wonderful web site Quote Investigator shows, the whole tree and fish story emerged gradually from an allegory about the nature of education, finally resulting in the internet-friendly text in question which was then attributed to Einstein (perhaps because people think “Einstein” when they think “genius”?)

Would Einstein have approved of the quotation attributed to him? I was skeptical, and so I turned to a collection of Einstein’s writings which, as luck would have it, had an education section. There I found that Einstein probably didn’t think that everyone was a genius. If he did, he probably wouldn’t have written the following in 1952:

“There are only a few enlightened people with a lucid mind and style and with good taste within a century. What has been preserved of their work belongs among the most precious possessions of mankind.”

Moreover, it seems unlikely that Einstein would have endorsed courses of study suited to the particular aptitudes of the student. Rather, he seemed to support a broad education for the sake of general intellectual development. In an address he gave in 1936, for example, Einstein declared:

“I want to oppose the idea that the school has to teach directly that special knowledge and those accomplishments which one has to use later directly in life. The demands of life are much too manifold to let such a specialized training in school appear possible [...] The development of general ability for independent thinking and judgement should always be placed foremost.”

Now if only we could get that all over the internet.

Todd Pettigrew is an associate professor of English at Cape Breton University.




Browse

Why we should forget Einstein’s tree-climbing fish

  1. Hi Todd Pettigrew, I am extremely happy that for once someone confirmed that a(t least this one) quote attributed to Einstein and copied, re-copied, re-re-copied… in the internet is a fake / not authored by Albert Einstein. For years I’m fighting all sorts of fake quotes attributed to Einstein, and the indignant mails from those who send me the “proof” of the quotes’ authenticity : “three million hits online”.- You may like this comment, too : http://einsteinsleuth.blogspot.co.il/ Best regards from Jerusalem – Barbara

  2. “You just have to work hard and learn how to do it.” This is completely untrue and feeds Western societies ideology of liberal individualism: anyone can do well if they work hard enough. In reality, our capitalist world is structured so that only a few can succeed while the majority must fulfill the bottom ranking positions. This is how capitalism functions while maintaining the idea that every individual has an equal opportunity to make it to the top. This is the inherent contradiction of capitalism; however, it is an ideology that keeps the system functioning smoothly by ensuring those who do not succeed believe it is due to their own lack of intelligence, motivation etc.–that is, it is hegemonic. Our education system works under the same model of ‘equal opportunity’ using standardized testing and the idea that the most intelligent and motivated will succeed. If you did not succeed you must not be as intelligent. The correlation between socioeconomic status and educational success is completely ignored as is the fact that class inequality serves the purpose of keeping the beneficiaries of this kind of ideology on the top of the social hierarchy. I’m quite surprised to hear an English professor believing in taken for granted ‘truths.’ I do understand that not everyone is a ‘genius’ in the way that Shakespeare and Einstein were, but that does not mean every person isn’t intelligent in a myriad of ways if given half a chance, which is certainly not occurring in this type of society.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *