7

ADQ: Big Tent or Gong Show?


 

Not too long ago, one half of Deux Maudits Anglais interviewed Action Democratique du Québec interim president Mario Charpentier. He was a nice enough fellow, aware of his party’s difficulties, which are many and legion, yet imbibed with a jarring optimistic streak that seems only to strike politicians and missionaries. Things we looking up for the ADQ, he said. The party was no longer shackled with the weight of high expectations; its core group of ground workers who made up the party’s vote-harvesting machine, so effective in the 2007 election, were showing signs of a return to the ADQ bosom; and, after years of Mario Dumont’s ambiguity on the constitutional file, Charpentier came out and said the ADQ was going unabashedly federalist. Charpentier himself was able to say the dreaded ‘C’ word without retching–with a certain pride, even. “I don’t know we need to be ashamed of the word,” he said of ‘Canada.’ 

Raymond Bréard might not be ashamed of the word but, as former Director-General of the PQ, as well as a close friend and former advisor to péquiste Premier Bernard Landry, he doesn’t have much time for it. Odd, then, that Mr. Bréard has returned to politics as an advisor to ADQ leadership hopeful Christian Lévesque. Bréard has already raised the ire of adéquistes–though mostly because of his involvement in a lobbying scandal some years ago, and not because he’s a nasty separatissssste. “As far as image is concerned, it might hurt a little bit,” said Lévesque’s opponent, Éric Caire. (Caire would be a hypocrite if he attacked Bréard’s PQ background. As La Presse‘s Tommy Chouinard helpfully points out, Caire himself employs a former bloquiste on his campaign team.)

 A Mari usque ad Mare this isn’t. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, of course: a large chunk of Quebec’s voting public has long had its foot out the door, and it only natural to have this reflected throughout the political class. What it suggests, though, is that the ADQ will continue to be as ambiguous as it has always been, despite the wishes of Charpentier’s red-and-white ilk. It also suggests a crise de coeur within the party at some point as the two sides engage in an inevitably long, drawn out hissy fit. Kind of like Quebec as a whole, come to think of it.


 
Filed under:

ADQ: Big Tent or Gong Show?

  1. Interesting. Well, anything is possible, especially with the ADQ. Question: if they sit on the fence on separatism, from whom will they steal votes? Both the PLQ and the PQ?

  2. Well, you know the PQ is sobbing right now; a good ole red & white conversion would’ve given them a chance to split the vote in some ridings that would have been otherwise inexpugnable to the PQ… And, it would have marginalized them in the french electorate.

    Funny how things work, really…

    • Inexpugnable is a wonderful English word, but it is never actually used. Ironically, it has been expugned from many dictionaries.

      • Next time I’ll refrain from trying to mingle.

        Sorry ’bout dat, sir.

        • Sorry, I didn’t mean to offend you. I was honestly interested in the word that you used. I have an inordinate interest in obscure words. I appreciate your mingling.

          • See, that’s the joy of arguing using a language you learned later in your life, mostly trough reading books and scientific litterature; you use words most people never think about and end up feeling laughed at because of that, even when people are being appreciative of said words.

            Well, score one for the values of dialogue, I guess…

  3. Mario had a flash of insight all those years ago – why bother running for election by pretending that political principles are anything but a fraudulent scam? Do away with the party branding, stop pretending that you’re pro-separation or pro-federalist, pro-socialism or pro-market. The other political parties couldn’t give a damn about either separatism or federalism or the economy, only they feel obliged to pretend. But it’s not about any of the things they claim they stand for. It’s about power and money and nothing else.

    Mario realized that since principles mean nothing, there was an opportunity to take some of the market share by selling the public an anonymous Brand X. Except he couldn’t call it “Brand X”, he had to make up some nice-sounding but totally meaningless, nothing name.

    “You’re going to get neither sovereignty nor federalism, the Anglo money is going to keep rolling in, and your government is going to keep on expanding forever. Since anyone who claims differently is a liar, vote for the man who claims nothing and stands for nothing – VOTE ADQ!”

Sign in to comment.