Alberta government offers to pay homeowners in floodways to get out -

Alberta government offers to pay homeowners in floodways to get out

The Alberta government is offering homeowners living in floodways a chance to get out.


BRAGG CREEK, Alta. – The Alberta government is offering homeowners living in floodways a chance to get out.

The owners of about 250 homes in six southern communities devastated by flooding in June are being given the option to sell out to the provincial government.

Even if the houses weren’t damaged, owners are eligible for a buyout worth the tax-assessed value of their home.

The cost of the program could run as high as $175 million.

“We know that floodway development is dangerous. Development in these areas puts lives at risk and is an ongoing risk to taxpayers as well,” Municipal Affairs Minister Doug Griffiths said Thursday.

“I’ve equated it many times to building on the train tracks. This new policy will allow Albertans in the impacted floodways another option to rebuild their lives and will provide protection for all Albertans going forward.”

Griffiths said the government will pay 100 per cent of this year’s property-tax assessed value.

More than 100 of the affected homes are in High River, 57 are in Medicine Hat, 50 are in Calgary and another 36 are in Bragg Creek.

Any homes the government buys out are likely to be destroyed or sold and moved from the flood area, Griffiths said.

“The way that this program is set up it is my anticipation that there will be very, very few people who will not take the 100 per cent assessment — take their value and move to another location,” he said.

“We want to make sure we take the property … the home … out of the floodway. Whether or not that means the home gets torn down or picked up and relocated … we’ll work on that on a case-by-case basis.”

Homeowners do not have to accept the deal and can still receive funding to rebuild or repair their homes, but the property will not qualify for future funding if another flood strikes.

The offer does not apply to the hard-hit Hamptons neighbourhood in High River. After the Highwood River overflowed its banks, water filled the area and settled to create an extensive lake. Homes sat under water for several weeks and will need to be torn down.

Some owners there have said they want a buyout, so they have the financial freedom to make a decision about their future.

“I would have taken (a buyout),” said Jamie Ellice, a real estate agent who built his home in the Hamptons just four months before the flood.

“I’m not asking for the world. I just want what I had on June 19. I want it back.”

Ellice said the government could have simplified things with a buyout in the Hamptons instead of insisting the homes be remediated and made safe for habitation. Most are expected to be torn down.

“We don’t have a choice. We don’t have a say.”

Chris Anger and his wife Betty were in the neighbourhood, but after the flood they moved back into their first home, which they had been using as a rental property. Their tenants moved out and Betty Anger was scrubbing the floor Thursday trying to complete the cleanup.

The rental house should be eligible for the provincial buyout.

“I guess it’s better than nothing, isn’t it?” said Chris Anger.

“My wife wants to move. She wants … out of High River, but she’s content coming back here for the time being.”

Anger said, no matter what, he and his wife won’t be returning to the Hamptons. He said the aggravation isn’t worth it and he’s tempted to let the bank take the house. He doubts it would sell even if it were rebuilt.

“Sell over in the Hamptons? I don’t think that will happen in 100 years.

“We can rebuild all we want and we will never get out what we put into it and I don’t think anybody in the Hamptons — I don’t think anybody in High River — is going to sell for a long, long time.”

Griffiths said he realizes Hampton residents aren’t going to be pleased with Thursday’s announcement.

“This a policy to deal with the floodway. It’s the fastest-moving water that’s the most dangerous,” he said.

“The Hamptons are neither in the floodway or the flood fringe. I know they suffered damage. We have the (recovery) program which will help them rebuild their homes — tear them down and rebuild them — because that is a viable neighbourhood and a viable community,” he added.

“I know that some of them are frustrated and they don’t want to be there, but they have the option of rebuilding their homes and moving if they like.”


Alberta government offers to pay homeowners in floodways to get out

  1. Mansbridge is right. In part it is the rails. The reason Intrepid didn’t come from Cgy. The reason geniuses don’t come from Cgy or SK and why the best, brightest, sunniest and most talented, leave SK for Wpg.
    The road travel time from Cgy to Vancouver is 12hrs. In Saskatoon, the driving time for goods is equal to Vancouver and to Thimder Bay. Obviously the bigger port has advantages. Cgy was hooked into the inferior Western ethic (lack of big efficient gvmt) long before Leduc oil (1958). It is geography. The Great Depression permanently turned AB inefficient. Leduc just reinforced it so it didn’t fail in a 3rd world or Deep South USA way.
    Winnipeg was already formed by the Great Depression. It formed from hard work and a diversified economy. Cgy was hard work laying the pipeline, but once that was over it like Texas, is nothing but a giant communist welfare state (despite the frontier delusions). PlaP to somewhere in Quebec, West of where they get prejudiced against the English/Scottish, will always output geniuses for the world. AB/SK won’t. Don’t be afraid to let the land locked provinces separate, but don’t ever lose Mtl to the Neocon Bible-thumpers. Whereas in Eurasia, a central location was guaranteed to breed too big a military mentality. Peace with the USA ensured all satellite regions shipping/railing to the St.Lawrence manufacturing heartland, also got the superior Scottish ethic of respect for education, childcare, atheism/agnostic…

    • Build a floodway you #$%^ing idiots. It will cost $1B a year not too, until the rivers dry up mid century. When that happens, move to somewhere not petro-linked.

      • $500/yr until 2032, $1.5B yr after until AGW dries up the glaciers.
        The reason USA culture was/is inferior is Hollywood was mostly Italian actors. And the cowboy culture underfunds gvmt and keeps taxes too low. The USA made a break from England, and England had a lot of the Scottish respect for peace, education, and channelling market forces towards developing technologies that make humans in our non-heaven world; making heaven on Earth. All AB is, is a lobby for low taxes and 7 day Church worship. I suppose you can do anything given enough petro in the ground, but the improvement to a post-modern society (timid in the wake of two WWIIs), expands on the Scottish Enlightenment. It is a tech shift of using technologies for good, not using them for bad, and using technologies to police other technologies and to police against tyranny. Stick your heads in the tar and building larger homes is a coward’s path.