BBC charged with unbalanced reporting - Macleans.ca
 

BBC charged with unbalanced reporting

Terror watchdog says it is adopting a “campaigning stance” to legalize assisted suicide


 

If a news organization decides to air a controversial speech, is it guilty of biased reporting? Lord Carlile, the British government’s terror watchdog, thinks so. The BBC’s broadcasting of Sir Terry Pratchett’s speech in favour of “euthanasia  tribunals” is, in Carlile’s mind, evidence of biased journalism and a “campaigning stance” to make assisted suicide legal. In a letter to Sir Michael Lyons, the chairman of the BBC trust, Carlile has also taken issue with a veteran presenter’s on-air admission that he smothered his partner, who was dying of AIDS. (The presenter has since been questioned by police on suspicion of murder.) For its part, the BBC says it had “no legal obligation” to tell police about the presenter’s confession.

Telegraph


 
Filed under:

BBC charged with unbalanced reporting

  1. Well done BBC. It is once again freedom of speech at work. I may not see "the right to die" in my lifetime, but it will eventually happen. Medical advances and technologies can go too far in trying to sustain life at all costs, no matter the wishes of the individual. That can't be right.

  2. Unbalanced reporting, the BBC? Who’d ever believe it?
    Obviously didn’t notice the Corp’s global warming (whoops, climate change) crusade.

  3. "The decision to broadcast Sir Terry Pratchett's speech advocating "euthanasia tribunals" in full earlier this month was an example of unbalanced reporting, the alliance claimed."

    I don't understand this. So reporting… news… is unbalanced reporting?

    Terry Pratchett is one of the UK's greatest linguists, anything he says should be reported on.