Fears arise that Chinese bird flu may be transferred between humans - Macleans.ca

Fears arise that Chinese bird flu may be transferred between humans


A worker catches a live chicken at a poultry market in Shanghai, China on Friday, April 5, 2013.(AP)

A new strain of bird flu that has killed 17 people in China and infected at least 82, may have been transferred from human-to-human, officials said.

Up until now, officials in both China and at the World Health Organization have urged calm, saying that the H7N9 virus only appeared to be transferred from a bird to a human and not from human to human.

One of the families that is causing the concern is the first reported case, a 87-year-old man who died of the virus. He may have transmitted the virus to his two sons, Chinese news agencies report. “Further investigations are still under way to figure out whether the family cluster involved human-to-human transmission,” Feng Zijian, director of the health emergency center of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, told reporters. He went on to say that “human-to-human transmission, in theory, is possible, but is highly sporadic.”

Chinese officials also said 40 per cent of those infected were not able to confirm that they had direct contact with poultry before becoming sick.

A World Health Organization official confirmed Wednesday that they were also investigating the case of two young boys in Beijing, who may have infected one another. “Even if two family members are positive, it is not necessarily the case they got it from each other. They may have gotten it from the same bird,” Gregory Hartl, a spokesman for W.H.O. in Geneva, told The New York Times.

In a briefing note issued Wednesday, the World Health Organization said there was still no evidence to indicate human-to-human transmission, but that more cases of H7N9 are likely. “Until the source of infection has been identified, it is expected that there will be further cases of human infection with the virus in China,” wrote the World Health Organization.

While the number of cases remains small, and the World Health Organization has not recommended any travel advisories to China, the bird flu is having an effect on the Chinese economy, particularly on poultry companies, reports Forbes. Earlier this month, officials killed more than 20,000 birds at a live poultry market after some of the birds tested positive for the H7N9 virus. Other live poultry markets have also been shut down.


Fears arise that Chinese bird flu may be transferred between humans

  1. PCR is not yet that cheap or effective. And a bird phlegm sensor might be hard. But there is a need for IT and electronics companies (like RIM) to come up with (perhaps with the help of subsidies instead of tax breaks to finance and tar) a bird poop sensor. The main market would be Asia. I’d guess a Q-tip like device could look for urea and whatever else is unique about bird poop.
    It isn’t certain that bird poop is relevant here, but the societal ROI is off the charts even if only to eliminate bird poop as a potential pandemic reservoir. I suggest taxing rich people, banks and tar to pay for it.

  2. A recent stroy mentioned a person’s eyes may be a source of infection for H7 influenza (strains?). If so, face washing and fash washing infrastructures (teaching, soap, water, waterless soap media) are effective and a future prophylactic may be some sort of injection in our tear ducts or a daily eye wash that strengthens the anti-microbial properties of our eyes. This is only funded by tar and finance if we tax them enough, regardless of what rich too religious power brokers in this once post-modern country, think.