Justin Trudeau rakes in $1.3M for Grit leadership bid - Macleans.ca

Justin Trudeau rakes in $1.3M for Grit leadership bid


OTTAWA – Justin Trudeau has pulled in $1.3 million so far in the Liberal leadership contest, burnishing his credentials as a political money magnet.

That’s triple what Tom Mulcair raised during the whole of his successful bid for the NDP leadership last year.

And it’s doubtlessly miles ahead of the combined fundraising draw of Trudeau’s rivals in the Liberal race.

The six contenders must file the first of four weekly financial reports with Elections Canada by Sunday.

The Trudeau team says the front-runner’s report will show he’s raked in just over $1 million since launching his campaign last October — and that doesn’t include the 10 per cent that the party takes from all donations.

Nor does it include another $300,000 that the Trudeau team says has been raised but has not yet been processed by the party, through which donations must be funnelled in order to be eligible for tax receipts.

Earlier financial reports showed Trudeau had raised $760,000 by the end of last year — six times more than his nearest competitor, Marc Garneau, who has since dropped out and thrown his support to the front-runner.

The latest numbers show Trudeau has almost doubled his haul in less than three months of the new year.

His team is particularly pleased that he’s raised the money largely through small donations from more than 7,500 donors.

The average donation is $155. More than 3,000 donors contributed $20 or less, according to Trudeau’s campaign team.

The eldest son of former prime minister Pierre Trudeau has long been the Liberals’ biggest fundraising draw.

The ability to attract small donations from thousands of contributors is crucial to the party’s financial survival, particularly since the per-vote subsidy for federal political parties is being phased out.

Traditionally most reliant on large donations from wealthy individuals and corporations, the Liberal party has struggled to raise money since political financing reforms went into effect in 2004, severely limiting the amount individuals could contribute and banning all but small corporate contributions to local riding campaigns.

Stephen Harper’s Conservatives further tightened the rules, slashing the individual donation limit to $1,200 and banning corporate contributions entirely. They are in the process of phasing out the per-vote subsidy, implemented in 2004 to compensate parties for the loss of corporate money.

The Tories have thrived under the tighter financing regime, having mastered the art of raising small donations from thousands of supporters.

Last year, the Tories pulled in $17.3 million — more than twice the Liberals’ $8.3 million.

Trudeau has already raised more than the $950,000 spending limit set by the party for the leadership contest, although some expenses are not included in that cap. Trudeau’s team has said he’ll turn any surplus funds over to the party.

By the end of last year, none of his rivals had come close to Trudeau in the amount of money raised and there’s little to suggest that has changed dramatically in the new year.

According to the party’s year-end financial report, former Toronto MP Martha Hall Findlay had raised $150,000. But since about $35,000 of that was devoted to paying off debt from her 2006 leadership bid, that put her just behind Garneau, who had raised $123,000 for the current contest.

Toronto lawyer George Takach, who has since dropped out and endorsed Trudeau, had raised $106,000 while Vancouver MP Joyce Murray had raised $57,000, retired military officer Karen McCrimmon $20,000 and Toronto lawyer Deborah Coyne $16,000.

No numbers were included in the year-end party financial report for former cabinet Martin Cauchon or Ottawa lawyer David Bertschi, who dropped out of the race this week. Neither officially registered as candidates until January.


Justin Trudeau rakes in $1.3M for Grit leadership bid

  1. $1.3 million for an ideological lightweight like Justin? A bunch of trendy wendy’s caught up in a tsunami of unwarranted brain-addled enthusiasm.

    • Perhaps it would be better to have an “ideological lightweight” than the neocon idiologue we now have as PM.

  2. Ahh, it was written by the Canadian Press – lackeyist of Liberal lackies, hence the grovelling to the god of Trudeau. In fact, there is a point here, and it is that Trudeau is a draw (although we knew that, still valid confirmation). But the naked spinning of Trudeau as Saviour is overdone and reeks of partisanship. It diminishes the impact of the point, and would diminish the reputation of CP if they had not already established themselves as the designated Red Party butt-kissers.

    As for the Tories, in light of the many instances of questionable election funding by the Harper Government, I would be reluctant to attribute the size of their war chest to thealir superior ability to get small donations. It is just as likely, if not more, that their only superior ability is cheating. While the CP may not want to say that out loud, it would then perhaps be best not to mention the Cons funding at all.

    • As much as I don’t like the Cons taking down the per vote subsidy, most of the funding legal issues I’ve known about were about crossing the line between the federal party and individual members which is a line that barely exists. That really is a technicality, imo. (Although I don’t know about the Penashue situation.) The Reform/Alliance would never have existed without grassroots, something would have to change a lot before they stopped having a big advantage in individual donations. I’m pretty impressed the Liberals have gotten to half as much.

  3. With Trudeau as leader, the Liberals will match the CPC, step for step in fundraising. Harper’s changes to party funding will come back to bite him. Beautiful poetic justice…

  4. It will be interesting to see how the party’s finances for the year end up. If Trudeau’s actually brought in an extra $1.3M, I’d say that’s impressive. If it’s simply the same Liberal Party donors that always write checks, they’re just writing them to him instead of Party HQ then – not so much. But I’m not really doubting the claim, his dad’s Bay Street buddies are still around, and they know who their guy is.

    • No way of settling it, but I’d be very surprised if much of this money is flowing from Bay Street. I don’t think PET’s connections ran that deep on Bay Street. More like Westmount.

  5. Remember that of that average donation of $155 to JT’s campaign, just under $40 actually comes from the donor – the other (just under) $120 comes from taxpayers, whether they support Trudeau or not.
    Similarly, a large portion of the CPC haul of about $17 million and the LPC haul of $8 million comes from taxpayers.

    • You make it sound as though this is not true for the other parties; now why would you do that?

      • I didn’t mention the other parties because I was too lazy to look up their numbers – the numbers I used all came from the article, so no nefarious intent.

        But yes, all political entities benefit from this taxpayer subsidy, and it is one of the many tax breaks that could easily be eliminated.

  6. If this leadership race isn’t smelling like U.S. politics everyday, my sense of smell is going to pot! Knowledge, and experience no longer count, just the all-mighty dollar determines which candidate is able to be heard more often in more places!
    It probably doesn’t matter who leads the country if history repeats, as those with money will set the rules to their advantage!