Manitoba judge’s pornographic photos surface online - Macleans.ca
 

Manitoba judge’s pornographic photos surface online

Judge’s lawyer husband solicited sex with photos


 

A Winnipeg man says his lawyer, Jack King, sent him “disgusting” nude pictures of King’s wife, Associate Chief Justice Lori Douglas, engaged in bondage with chains, using sex toys and performing oral sex. Alexander Chapman, a 44-year-old computer specialist says that he was sent a link to the web site Darkcavern.com that promotes inter-racial sex (Chapman is black and originally from Trinidad) by King, who had completed Chapman’s divorce in 2003. “I wanted to puke,” Chapman said in an interview on CBC News, adding “[King] looked at me as a sex object.” Douglas became a judge in 2005, at which time she would have been required to disclose her kinky past, say experts. Past Supreme Court rulings have affirmed that as the embodiment of the justice system, judges should not be hired if their past will reflect badly on the court, says Sébastien Grammond, dean of civil law at the University of Ottawa. A complaint was filed with the Canadian Judicial Council.

CBC News


 
Filed under:

Manitoba judge’s pornographic photos surface online

  1. Jack King sounds like a made-up online alias to me.

  2. How come the wife has to face ridicule and punishment for the husband's wrong doing/indescrition? Are we asking our judges to be nuns and monks too? These are human beings with needs, just like you and I. What they do inside their bedroom and how they are doing it (spice or no spice), is their own business.

    • not if their morals are judging society. if she makes bad decisions in her bedroom, what kind of decisions will she make regarding other people's lives. she's a moron but so are lots of judges, politicians and power brokers in canada.

      • What suggests that the decisions she's made in her bedroom are bad ones?

      • There are questionable judgements handed down by judges, but who are we to judge what is going inside their bedrooms (between husband and wife)? If there are other people involved then yes, her judgement has to be questioned. If like her husband, she solicited sex, then she should be barred from that bench. But is there such thing as constitutionally approved sexual activity between couple? Which positions and activities are morally or constitutionally acceptable? Dressed or undressed? If dressed, what kind of bedroom dresses are morally acceptable for judges to wear while doing bedroom activity (burqa)? Really guys, what is next? Light or no light? Open eyes or closed? Bed or no bed? Do we assign people to go into judges bedroom to see if they follow the perceived "moral" sex rules? Can you imagine, a person telling the judge while in action, "Ehhmm, sorry judge, that is below the belt"?

      • I agree with you 100%…Judges are our Moral "guardian"…let's not be rubber band here…This judge did engage in kind of multi-racial sexe exchange…probably in front of her husband, with his full OK'ed….Yuuuuuk… and the next morning she preside over someone case in court room? give me a break! What else we do not know? sexe with animal maybe?….She has the right to ALL dirty sex in her bedroom…she's just pervers to have her pictures taken full nude..huuum… with her husband…but too bad…the acts got out….to the public! She should know better. Sorry for your boobs on the net.

    • Photos posted online of Douglas allegedly show her sucking other mens' penises… other than hubby Jack King, that is. That's hardly private 'in the bedroom' stuff… and why would King suggest Chapman have a go at his wife if she wasn't aready into the idea? If this were truly a private matter, it'd simply be a scenario involving, say, Judge Lori flogging King in his underoos in their private bedroom… period. But if they're soliciting outside help… especially from among their professional clients – that's another matter entirely. No way, I'm not letting Douglas off the hook… I'd have some serious problems with someone like her handling my child custody case… how could someone like her be in any position to make moral judgments about parental rights, fitness to parent, etc…. aaarrgh!! She's a family judge, for cryin'out loud! She is held to a higher standard than the rest of us punters. The HIGHEST standard, in fact. She blew it. How many other moral deviants are in our justice system?

    • right on: it is nobodies business except hers

    • Everyone in this matter… Chapman, King, Douglas… are facing ridicule. King was let go from his law firm, King stepped aside of her own accord, and Chapman… well, every time he opens his mouth, we see what a tool he is. The only 'punishment' being doled out to this point is that imposed by King-Douglas-Chapman on themselves.

      • correction:' 'Douglas' stepped aside of her own accord…'

  3. How can you trust the judgement of a judge that engages in stuff like was alleged ? Sorry but this judge should be disbarred….or whatever it is they do to judges. Don't put her in chains or a humiliating position…..she'd probably like it.

    • neanderthol

  4. It does seem a bit odd that the judge was taking part in all this kinky activity and now finds herself in a position of such authority. I suppose everyone is entitled to have a slightly murky past though.

  5. I find it extremely hard to believe that King posted photos of Douglas online without her consent. He's obviously backtracking now, to try to protect her. He says he was depressed because of the death of a close friend and that explains his bizarre behaviour. Very lame excuse. These people in authority see to think they're entitled to do as they please… reminds me of 'Eyes Wide Shut', with the secret society of society's elite engaging in weird sex rituals. I'd like to see more of these people flushed out into the open and purged from positions of publictrust.

    • Really, Picky dear?
      What makes you so sure that this asshole Jack King posted photos WITHOUT her consent?

      You're dreamin' in technicolor or you're about l6 years old! This pervert manipulated his wife to do what pleased HIM, obviously, and then used the "evidence" to discredit her, and the bloody justice system. Wake up, Open your eyes, and smell the gender bias here, dollbabe. King needs a good Bubba and a life sentence to fix his sexual appetities with even more interesting photo ops…..

    • Picky you ain't too picky here and your comment is a HALF-TRUTH. Agreed Mr. Picks that "people in authority feel entitled"…and yes, Eyes Wide Shut is most appropriately used here by you. But to imply that this pervert King got his wife's consent to post these pictures is STUPID!
      The jerk just wanted a fat alimony from the Judge and discrediting the justice system ain't bothering him too much either! Put the asshole King in Jail and let's hope he finds more juicy photos to post on the internet–with him in handcuffs and beaten to a pulp by his big bud…..

  6. Order in the court. Let the judge take a recess so we can examine the evidence. Cut the chat and post the pics. Eeee-haw!!!

  7. oh come on… a person's sex life has nothing to do with their ability to judge legal matters… as far as I know, judges are not sitting to pass judgment on defendants' morals. This all seems like a big set up to me.

  8. women shouldn't be judges, or police officer's or heads of corporations…their hormones run their lacking brains and they are all just basic whores without judgement….get rid of her and her lack of control….and she sits in judgement of others???….women need a wake-up call….fire her and let a man do the work that was intended for him

    • Dear ROSANNE MacCormick (Just Another "Whore Without Judgment!")….

      Sounds to me, babe, that you are a guy and your Hormonal Balance needs some correcting, in your andropause years, as well as your mental hygiene! You are a really sick puppy crying out for help…but Macleans can't help you, doll!

      Why don't you go to a brothel-addiction rehab and find a Bubba to take good care of you, sweetie!?? You need it!

    • You poor demented guy! It would probably be better for you to move in countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, or the middle easts. Take your pick!

  9. JACKASS KING should be handcuffed, whipped and photographed as "wanted" by the Justice system that he so flagrantly has no respect for!

    This pervert should be sued by his wife for millions for the embarrassment and obvious manipulative criminal tactics used to discredit both his wife AND the Justice system!

    The jerk should, upon release from prison, go on to become the next Jerry Springer of Canada….

  10. Rosanne McCormick

    Did you attend the Amsterdam School for Female Empowerment? Sounds like you got some real issues to clear up, my good man! (you can't be a female now, darlin')

  11. I agree that a murky past (or current) lifestyle should be no barrier to some career paths, but its impact on others is just as relevant. If I professionally fix and clean computers for a living, and personally download copious amounts of regular porn, do I impact my 'judgment' – if I come across something merely distasteful but not illegal – to report the user to the authorities? Where does my line in the sand lose its acuity? In the case of this judge, how will she blur the line of community standards in fairly and consistently applying her rulings?

  12. There are questionable judgements handed down by judges, but who are we to judge what is going inside their bedrooms (between husband and wife)? If there are other people involved then yes, her judgement has to be questioned. If like her husband, she solicited sex, then she should be barred from that bench. But is there such thing as constitutionally approved sexual activity between couple? Which positions and activities are morally or constitutionally acceptable? Dressed or undressed? If dressed, what kind of bedroom dresses are morally acceptable for judges to wear while doing bedroom activity (burqa)? Really guys, what is next? Light or no light? Open eyes or closed? Bed or no bed? Do we assign people to go into judges bedroom to see if they follow the perceived "moral" sex rules? Can you imagine, a person telling the judge while in action, "Ehhmm, sorry judge, that is below the belt"?

    • Ariadne, no one is questioning anyone's right to do what they want WITHIN THE PRIVACY OF THE BEDROOM. Remember though that this woman's sex pics were posted ONLINE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN… and that's a FACT. Unclear whether she in fact was aware or not of their being posted online… Jack King is now saying she had no knowledge… but really, come on, trust your gut… they had a kinky thing goin' on, soliciting inter-racial sex on the web (and, as Chapman and King himself freely admit, among clients), and thinking they could get away with it… Some one who is so sexually jaded (or retarded) that they need to dress up in silly outfits to get off, would probably get an extra sexual charge flaunting themselves on the 'net… "whooo, look at us, we're espected public figures and we're living this bizarre secret life…"

      • … But, as often happens inside the criminal mind, it got to the point where their judgment (such as it is/was in its depraved and degenerated form) slipped… they got sloppy, and they got caught. Now they're backtracking, and the legal and judicial community is colluding with them to 'whitewash' in order to protect themselves from further scrutiny, as much as anything. Hey, I'm not picking sides here… Chapman, Douglas, King… they're all equally rotten to the core. There are no heroes in this case. As lurid as this story is – and some say it should never have been run by the CBC in the first place – it puts the spotlight on the moral decay endemic to many of our so-called 'pillars of society'.

  13. This is a simple case of blackmail.He was paid $25,000 and signed off anything further.It happened 7 years ago.The blackmailer's lawyer should face sanctions also.

  14. give the lady a break its her bed room no one but her should know what goes on behind close

  15. just a old ugly slut who needs black cock badly…so what is the fuss?….she shouldn't be a JUDGE but she could be a porn star if she likes it so much…

  16. karol….right on

    dale….right on and funny

    and by the way….i am a woman who truly believes that women's so called 'empowerment' has destroyed our society…never has the world been is such a disgraceful mess and the manners and everyday conduct of women has deteriorated…men are the sane and decent sex….let them run our world again..and women should get back to raising their self-destructive bastards.

    • I'm sorry but I can;t believe you are a woman, go back to what? being beaten by a man and no where to turn, I have a pension to help me in my golden years because i could work outside of the home, should my kids have been brought up by a good man like that/ Take your head out of your behind and grow up.

  17. I checked this site out, one section called "choking on the chocolate stick" could be some kind of medical advise. This story would make more sense that the Honourable Naughty ones not knowing about the pictures.

  18. How many other judges ( lawyers) belong to this club ? I hope the CBC does not fire the reporters who brought this story to light.

  19. I don’t know the lady ( Chief Justice Lori Douglas ) but if she were my daughter, Alex Chapman and his two douchbag lawyers, would be looking over their shoulders ..Why the 3 of them aren’t in jail,I’ll never know,( blackmail,?extortion ?),but as I said,if she were my daughter,,all three would be spending a LONG time in the hospital..