7

North Korea says military cleared to attack with nukes

U.S. moves into position, seeks to defuse escalating situation


 

In this monitor screen image taken by the Korean Central News Agency, the Unha-3 rocket lifts off from a launch site on the west coast, in the village of Tongchang-ri, about 56 km from the Chinese border city of Dandong, North Korea on Dec. 12, 2012. (AP Photo/Korea Central News Agency via Korea News Service)

PAJU, South Korea – North Korea warned early Thursday that its military has been cleared to attack the U.S. using “smaller, lighter and diversified nuclear” weapons, while the U.S. said it was strengthening protection in the region and seeking to defuse the situation.

Despite the intense rhetoric, analysts do not expect a nuclear attack by North Korea, which knows the move could trigger a destructive, suicidal war that no one in the region wants. It’s not believed to have the ability to launch nuclear-tipped missiles, but its other nuclear capabilities aren’t fully known.

U.S. Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel said Washington was doing all it can to defuse the situation. The Pentagon also will deploy a missile defence system to the U.S. Pacific territory of Guam to strengthen regional protection against a possible attack.

The strident warning from Pyongyang is the latest escalating threats from North Korea, which has railed against joint U.S. and South Korean military exercises taking place in South Korea and has expressed anger over tightened sanctions for its February nuclear test.

Acting on one of its threats, North Korean border authorities have refused to allow entry to South Koreans who manage jointly run factories in the North Korean city of Kaesong. Trucks carrying cargo and South Korean workers were turned back Wednesday and again Thursday morning.

This spring’s annual U.S.-South Korea drills have incorporated fighter jets and nuclear-capable stealth bombers, though the allies insist they are routine exercises. Pyongyang calls them rehearsals for a northward invasion.

The foes fought on opposite sides of the three-year Korean War, which ended in a truce in 1953. The divided Korean Peninsula remains in a technical state of war six decades later, and Washington keeps 28,500 troops in South Korea to protect its ally.

Hagel said Washington was doing all it can to defuse the situation, echoing comments a day earlier by Secretary of State John Kerry.

“Some of the actions they’ve taken over the last few weeks present a real and clear danger and threat to the interests, certainly of our allies, starting with South Korea and Japan and also the threats that the North Koreans have levelled directly at the United States regarding our base in Guam, threatened Hawaii, threatened the West Coast of the United States,” Hagel said Wednesday.

In Pyongyang, the military statement said North Korean troops had been authorized to counter U.S. “aggression” with “powerful practical military counteractions,” including nuclear weapons.

“We formally inform the White House and Pentagon that the ever-escalating U.S. hostile policy toward the DPRK and its reckless nuclear threat will be smashed by the strong will of all the united service personnel and people and cutting-edge smaller, lighter and diversified nuclear strike means,” an unnamed spokesman from the General Bureau of the Korean People’s Army said in a statement carried by state media, referring to North Korea by its formal name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. “The U.S. had better ponder over the prevailing grave situation.”

However, North Korea’s nuclear strike capabilities remain unclear.

Pyongyang is believed to be working toward building an atomic bomb small enough to mount on a long-range missile. Long-range rocket launches designed to send satellites into space in 2009 and 2012 were widely considered covert tests of missile technology, and North Korea has conducted three underground nuclear tests, most recently in February.

“I don’t believe North Korea has to capacity to attack the United States with nuclear weapons mounted on missiles, and won’t for many years. Its ability to target and strike South Korea is also very limited,” nuclear scientist Siegfried Hecker, a senior fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation at Stanford University, said this week.

“And even if Pyongyang had the technical means, why would the regime want to launch a nuclear attack when it fully knows that any use of nuclear weapons would result in a devastating military response and would spell the end of the regime? ” he said in answers posted to CISAC’s website.

In Seoul, a senior government official said Tuesday that it wasn’t clear how advanced North Korea’s nuclear weapons capabilities are. But he also noted fallout from any nuclear strike on Seoul or beyond would threaten Pyongyang as well, making a strike unlikely. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to speak publicly to the media.

North Korea maintains that it needs to build nuclear weapons to defend itself against the United States. On Monday, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un led a high-level meeting of party officials who declared building the economy and “nuclear armed forces” as the nation’s two top priorities.


 
Filed under:

North Korea says military cleared to attack with nukes

  1. No one believed Noah when he got into the Ark…….One day this verse will come to pass……Are you in the Ark of Gods provision in Christ Jesus ?

    ……1 Thessalonians 5:3…..

    For when they say, “Peace and safety!” then sudden destruction comes upon them, as labor pains upon a pregnant woman. And they shall not escape.

    • They don’t have armaments to wipe out an entire country, we do, and they are picking a fight with us? Not to mention, China and South Korea is with us on this.

      • Even if they had just enough to make one atomic bomb, you’re right. Attacking the U.S would result in undoubted retaliation. The U.S could obliterate N.K completely, so attacking it would be unwise for an underfunded and undersized country. It’s like throwing a pebble at someone who’s holding a boulder.

        • It’s more like shooting someone with a gun who has a bigger gun. Sure he’s got a bigger gun, but you gain an awful lot by shooting first.

          • not really. Their largest nuke, if it hit the empire state building, would not even hit central park.

            Whereas all other nations involved have enough nuclear capabilities to turn the planet into dust.

            So it’s like pulling up naked with 5 buddies and some slingshots, then picking a fight with 1000 guys who have: Assault rifles, tanks, missile launchers and body armor, who also have 3 groups on standby the same size and same armaments.

            They are pointlessly outmatched.

  2. Woah, they’re dead…….

  3. Nothing has changed over the centuries. Humans just want to keep killing each other.

Sign in to comment.