Omar Khadr to appeal terrorism convictions


TORONTO – Former Guantanamo Bay detainee Omar Khadr plans to appeal his terrorism convictions and hopes to walk free if his efforts are successful.

Khadr’s lawyer Dennis Edney said Saturday that the Toronto-born 26-year-old was “looking forward” to the appeal which is expected to be filed “very soon.”

Khadr has been held in Ontario’s maximum security Millhaven Institution since his transfer to Canada last September from Guantanamo Bay, where he had been held for a decade.

He had pleaded guilty before a widely discredited American military commission in October 2010 to five war crimes — among them killing a U.S. special forces soldier — committed as a 15 year old in Afghanistan. He was given a further eight years behind bars.

Edney said the appeal being launched aims to have all those convictions dismissed.

“We are very confident that the military tribunal convictions will be overturned because in our view there are serious questions about the validity of all these convictions,” Edney told The Canadian Press.

Although Khadr opted for a plea agreement in 2010, Edney argued his guilty plea may not have too much of a bearing on his appeal.

“If you plead guilty to a charge which is a nullity in war, then the plea is also a nullity,” he said.

The case is still likely to be complicated as Khadr did sign away his appeal rights in 2010, but that obstacle too, Edney contended, could be surmounted.

“If the underlying acts weren’t crimes, at least not war crimes, then Mr. Khadr’s waiver may also be unreliable,” he said.

Edney said his team would be filing an appeal first with a U.S. military commission, and then later in the U.S. civil courts if necessary, to overturn all of Khadr’s convictions.

The terms of Khadr’s transfer to Canada precluded attacking his sentence in Canadian courts.

Working in Khadr’s favour, Edney said, are two similar military commission verdicts which American appeal courts have already thrown out after ruling the crimes did not exist under international law of war at the time.

Last October an American appeal court dismissed Osama bin Laden’s driver Salim Hamdan’s 2008 conviction for providing material support for terrorism.

In essence, the court ruled no such crime existed under international law of war at the time of the alleged offence and retroactive prosecutions were not authorized.

In January, the same court threw out the conviction of Ali Hamza al-Bahlul, a Yemeni who was charged with providing material support to terrorism and conspiracy for making propaganda videos for al-Qaida. In that case, however, a U.S. appeals court said earlier this month that it will reexamine the decision.

Nonetheless, Edney said the rulings on those two cases could bode well for Khadr’s appeal.

“As the law now stands, based upon two earlier rulings … where the civilian appeals court overturned the same charges Omar faced, it concluded the charges were not and are not, recognized international law of war charges,” he said.

Edney added that he was surprised previous lawyers retained by Khadr hadn’t filed an appeal so far.

“One would expect that should have been done as a matter of course, it wasn’t,” he said. “I took it upon myself to persuade the military defence department to agree that Omar Khadr’s case was worthy of an appeal and they agreed.”

Filed under:

Omar Khadr to appeal terrorism convictions

  1. Who is paying his lawyer?. This is a disgrace. And we pay welfare for the family as well

    Isn’t Dennis Edney the guy from Edmonton who was down in Cuba? Obviously he is looking for a big payday on the backs of all of us working slobs who faithfully pay our taxes.

    • What’s a disgrace? What’s disgraceful about trying to overturn or appealing the conviction of a military court that basically amounted to judicial blackmail – plead guilty you get to go to Canada and finish an 8 year sentence, or take your chances in the US and get an 800 year stretch?

      • Ar you saying the punk didn’t do it?

        • I’m saying he didn’t get a fair trail. Guilty or not, everyone is entitled to that. The plea bargain was a joke. Would you take 8 years or less in Canada or rot forever in the US system? They even hinted he wouldn’t be released even if he was found not guilty.

          • So why should he be brought here for a trial, when the “alleged” offense took place in Afghanistan, and he killed an American? Canada is not involved. We don’t go around the world taking issue with what courts in other countries do.
            Whether you think the trial was fair or not, and I do, then complain to the country that tried him, Have you not heard, “you do the crime in another country, you do the time in another country”.
            There are far more egregious cases than his (not that I agree it was even egregious); why don’t you go to bat for them? Or are you Dennis Edney in drauge, hoping for a big payday?

          • drauge…lol…spell check switch itself off?

            Common logical fallacy bud – false equivalency argument. I can’t argue for justice in OK’s case cuz there are worse cases out there. I’m sure there are, but that’s hardly an excuse,or even relevant,is it really?

            I didn’t suggest he come here for trial, just give him a fair one where he was tried. He was and is a CC, so you’re completely wrong – we do take issue if it is justified, and it was here. If he’s guilty, than prove in open court. there are a number of reasons to conclude this did not happen in his case.

  2. Only in Canada.

  3. Justine Trudeau the fellow who thinks the Boston bombers feel left out should be asked to comment. Imagine this goofy nut as prime minister.

  4. Yes, welfare was paid to the Khadr family….plus, the father was in hospital….Chretien spoke up to defend these people….Chretien always was ‘a total dumbass’

    Older sister married some twit from BC so she could stay in the country…..None of the Khadr’s have ever held a job…..who is going to hire Khadr if/when he gets out of jail….
    he should be deported……no future here….

    Any expenses should come out of ‘Chretien’s pension’ steve m

Sign in to comment.