Rob Ford alleged business deal was corrupt to get votes, lawyer suggests -

Rob Ford alleged business deal was corrupt to get votes, lawyer suggests


TORONTO – The lawyer for a businessman suing Toronto’s mayor for defamation is suggesting in court that Rob Ford alleged corruption to help himself get elected.

Restaurant owner George Foulidis alleges in a $6-million lawsuit that Ford defamed him when the mayor suggested a leasing deal between Foulidis’s company Tuggs Inc. and the city was corrupt.

Ford told a Toronto newspaper in the middle of his 2010 mayoral campaign that a sole-sourced, untendered, 20-year contract the city gave Tuggs for a restaurant on public land “stinks to high heaven.”

Foulidis’s lawyer, Brian Shiller, is telling court in his closing arguments that Ford jumped on brewing controversy around the Tuggs deal to illustrate his main campaign plank — stopping the so-called gravy train at city hall.

Shiller says Ford didn’t have any concrete evidence of corruption by Foulidis, city councillors or city staff, rather it was about “seeking votes and winning elections.”

The mayor is arguing that he was talking about the company, not Foulidis himself, and that companies can’t be defamed.

Filed under:

Rob Ford alleged business deal was corrupt to get votes, lawyer suggests

  1. Companies can’t be defamed? No doubt they can be libeled or slandered though can’t they? If not, does that mean someone could allege that the Mayor’s label company’s labels don’t stick or that the sticky part causes all kinds of maladies. Is the Mayor saying that his company would have no recourse if someone were to make things up about them?

  2. By same logic, Cheney’s old oil company, lots of other situations where accusations are made without proof.

  3. The war over afghanistan was “about oil” 10 years ago, but under Obama with 4x the american casualties per year, it is no longer about oil? How many people should Bush sue?

    Lots of sides are critical of what appears “corrupt”. City hall giving exclusive deal without competition isn’t that different than nearly identical accusations against deals given to haliburton.

    Both sides are making accusations tied to winning votes.

    • And these apples don’t taste anything like oranges!