Top court hears final government plea to allow easy path to Senate reform -

Top court hears final government plea to allow easy path to Senate reform


OTTAWA – Don’t make it impossible to change Canada’s scandal-plagued Senate.

That’s the underlying message to Supreme Court justices today as they wrap up a historic hearing that will decide how — or if — the much-maligned upper house can be reformed or abolished.

In its final appeal to the court, the federal government is urging the justices to accept its argument that modest reforms — to allow for non-binding elections and term limits — can be implemented easily by Ottawa alone, without any input from the provinces.

Federal counsel Robert Frater says the government’s position would allow meaningful reforms “instead of another 135 years of talk.”

His argument is getting partial support from one of two lawyers appointed by the court to give it impartial advice on the matter.

John Hunter says the federal government alone should be able to create a process to allow consultative elections for senators, provided that the elections are non-binding and the prime minister remains free to ignore the results.

He says opponents of the proposal are saying a prime minister can consult friends, partisan activists, or even a ouija board on whom to appoint to the Senate — in short, can consult with anyone, except voters.

Filed under:

Top court hears final government plea to allow easy path to Senate reform

  1. Watch, this will fizzle out in time. Since 1867 every government has talked, promised and talked some more. They will pass some relatively meaningless reform that doesn’t really do much at all and then tell the people a deceptive we have finally done something useful. Then the corruption, bloat and waste will continue.

    Only real right answer is abolishing the senate, so simple the government might not be able to fowl it up.

  2. I’m a believer in having a chamber of second thought over the “in vogue” government. The problem I see is that political parties, lobbyist and the like often end up owning the representatives. These same representatives need also remain shielded from public pressure because it is too easy for our new conglomerated news organizations to whip the public into an unruly mob.

    I am for transparently elected lifetime senators in a reformed bipartisan senate.