13

When Enough Is Enough


 

Two stories have dominated American news coverage in recent days: the first involved a public condemnation of the excessive rhetoric of Rush Limbaugh by a prominent and respected GOP operative; the second featured Jon Stewart’s frustration with the quality of reporting on a popular business news TV show. The spat between Limbaugh and David Frum speaks to a theme this blog has touched upon in recent weeks—namely, that the Republican party must come to grips with a new reality and start work on becoming a viable alternative to Obama and the Democrats. This is essential for a sound democracy. The showdown between Stewart and Jim Cramer, on the other hand, put a spotlight on news shows that try to justify the erroneous and contradictory information they reported regarding investment choices. What both media events have in common is that they are likely to become defining moments for both the future of the GOP and the coverage of the economic crisis hitting America and beyond. I believe it was about time both conflicts occurred, and I would like to add another ongoing source of frustration that needs to be addressed: the public resurfacing of Dick Cheney. But first, let us deal with the Republican infighting over Rush Limbaugh.

The cover of last week’s issue of Newsweek magazine featured a photo of radio host Rush Limbaugh with the caption ‘ENOUGH.’ Inside was an article by noted conservative commentator and former George W. Bush speechwriter David Frum, who called upon Republicans to distance themselves from the boisterous Limbaugh and develop a new discourse aimed at making conservatism more appealing to new voters. His argument is that Limbaugh is playing into the hands of Obama strategists by becoming the face of the GOP. A narrow and unattractive Republican party will emerge as a result. Frum says this can only benefit the Democrats and the Obama administration who, according to the author, are bringing back the type of big government liberalism not seen since FDR’s New Deal. But Frum believes the America of Rush Limbaugh is no longer in touch with today’s realities. For the first time in over 30 years, Frum notes, college graduates voted in greater numbers for the Democrats. The electorate is changing and Rush is speaking only to his radio audience; in doing so, he is doing a disservice to the conservative cause. Frum concludes it is time to say ‘Enough!’ to Limbaugh. Right on, David.

Later in the week, Jon Stewart openly criticized CNBC Mad Money host Jim Cramer for his hyped-up financial show and the ”misleading” financial advice Stewart believes it pushed. He pointed to the contradictions and the Wall Street-generated spin Cramer used to argue for policy and investment choices. Stewart, armed with video evidence, was able to illustrate that Cramer was wrong on Bear Stearns last year when he endorsed the purchase of the ill-fated stock just a few days before its demise. Stewart then showed how Cramer went on to completely contradict his earlier advice to his audience of potential investors. Clearly, Stewart hit a nerve and Cramer went on the Comedy Central show to defend himself. But Cramer mounted a feeble defence and Stewart held his own and said, ‘Enough!’ Way to go, Jon.

This weekend, on CNN‘s State of the Union, former vice president Dick Cheney was interviewed by John King about the Obama administration and whether America was as safe under Obama as it was under Bush. To no one’s surprise, Cheney claimed that Obama’s policy changes on torture, Gitmo, the use of the term enemy combatants, and the linkage between liberty and security were making America unsafe. Never mind that there is evidence that Cheney used his authority to fudge information to justify the eventual decision to go to war with Saddam Hussein ‘s Iraq instead of finishing the job in Afghanistan. Never mind that Cheney encouraged torture and rendition. Never mind that people’s civil rights were violated with Cheney’s approval. Never mind that Bush’s defence secretary, Robert Gates, is in the Obama administration, or that the national security advisor is Maj.-Gen. Jim Jones, a Republican who served under Bush. Instead, Cheney wants people to join the Bush surrogate campaign that is claiming victory in Iraq and acts as if the Bush years succeeded in its war on terror because no other attacks have taken place on US soil since 9/11. There has been an increase in pro-Bush propaganda in recent days, even though Obama has inherited the worst economy since the Great Depression, two wars are still active, and Bin Laden is still doing audio tapes eight years after 9-11. So, just like Frum and Stewart did to Limbaugh and Cramer, I too want to say ‘Enough!’ to Cheney


 

When Enough Is Enough

  1. I for one believe that Cheney may have a point . And it is easy to criticize old Rush but he is the only who stands agaist the government . Who is john stewart . Never heard of him .

  2. “Frum concludes it is time to say ‘Enough!’ to Limbaugh. Right on, David.”

    When I read about Frum and Limbaugh argument last week, I thought of Stalin’s comment about how many divisions does the Pope have. Limbaugh has 25 million listeners while Frum has 4 readers outside his family and friends so, obviously, Repubs should follow Frum. More seriously, the Limbaugh/Frum argy-bargy is a good thing because I believe parties should argue about what direction to take. The best ideas will win and that will help them electorally going forward.

    And I thought the Stewart-Cramer spat was lame. Cramer behaves like a carny employee so if you want serious business reporting, watch another show/channel because there are plenty of sober analysts out there.

    • And I thought the Stewart-Cramer spat was lame. Cramer behaves like a carny employee so if you want serious business reporting, watch another show/channel because there are plenty of sober analysts out there.

      In Stewart’s defense, his argument was really with CNBC writ large, with Cramer as a symptom, not the whole disease, however it was Cramer who freaked out about it (go figure!) so that’s where the whole thing snowballed. But keep in mind that Stewart wasn’t really (and especially not initially) going after just Cramer. Stewart also acknowledged Cramer’s shtick, and that he’s at least partly about entertainment over “serious journalism”, but pointed out (quite rightly, imho) that given that this is the case, perhaps CNBC shouldn’t be using promos such as “In Cramer We Trust” and suggesting that those who don’t know what to do with their money in these difficult economic times should tune in to Cramer.

      I think in a lot of ways, Cramer is the Jon Stewart of CNBC (in terms of how seriously he should be taken, as you point out). I think Stewart’s larger point is that perhaps there shouldn’t BE a “Jon Stewart of CNBC”. I think the point he was making is that the fact that people have trouble differentiating between “serious” news and fake news is a problem for the “serious” news people, not the comedians, and it’s a bit shocking that it’s the fake news guy who’s got to point that out.

    • Limbaugh has 22 million listeners (less than the recently deceased Paul Harvey, I was somewhat glad to discover), but his reputation among those who don’t listen to his show is toxic. The Republican Party is, of course, free to listen to whomever they want. But if Limbaugh is their choice, I’m afraid they’ll suffer much the same fate as the British Conservative Party after 1997, doomed to years in the wilderness before finally making exactly the type of changes that Frum (and some others) are proposing now.

  3. GEEZ MACLEANS!!!

    You’ve really got to fix this overly sensitive comment filter thing. I’ve got comment after comment after comment not getting through these days, and it’s driving me nuts.

    • Are you listening, Jonathan? (I’m assuming Jonathan is the IT guru responsible for this.)
      Come on, throw us a frickin’ bone here! :)

      • I’m so glad it’s not just me. I thought I’d done something terrible. Now I see that almost everyone’s having comments fail to go up that they can’t imagine, I mean not even IMAGINE, would get caught by a filter.

        It’s very frustrating.

        • Thanks . I thought it was just me .

        • If, while Jonathan is at it, he could arrange that paragraphs can be separated by a blank line that would be nice too.

  4. it is disgraceful to hear Cheney . America is safer with Obama than a hunting trip with Cheney .

  5. Is Frum credible. This guy was a cheer leader for the Bush admin. now he’s some kind of conservative guru. Talk about reinventing yrself!

    • Enough to discourage . I don’t this Stewart guy to tell me this.

Sign in to comment.