Where you live may decide how soon you die

Groundbreaking study looks at life and death by neighbourhood

by Ken MacQueen

A matter of postal codes

Stephen Brookbank

On March 6, Maclean’s hosts a town-hall discussion, “Health care in Canada: what makes us sick?” focusing on the social conditions that affect the health of Canadians, especially those in impoverished neighbourhoods. Held at the McIntyre Performing Arts Centre at Mohawk College in Hamilton, in conjunction with the Canadian Medical Association, it will also be broadcast on CPAC. The conversation about the health effects of disparities in income, education, housing and employment will continue in the coming months in the magazine, and at town halls in Charlottetown and Calgary.

What if you could see the future? What if you could see a young pregnant woman walking down Barton Street in Hamilton’s depressed north end and know her unborn child had already lost life’s lottery; that his or her fate was predetermined by Mom’s postal code?

You would know that this mother—in this neighbourhood, and in the bottom 20 per cent of the city’s income earners—is six times less likely than the wealthiest Hamiltonian to seek first-trimester prenatal care, and more than six times as likely to be a teenager or to have dropped out of school. You’d know the chances of her baby being born underweight and needing weeks in neonatal intensive care would also be higher.

And the child’s life would get no easier thereafter. If its parents lived an average life in this neighbourhood, they would die an average Third World death—at 65.5 years of age. If they lived five or six kilometres away, say, on Rice Avenue in the city’s leafy suburbs, they would live beyond 86 years.

What if you knew one of the world’s most advanced acute-care health facilities was here in Hamilton, yet was powerless to change the fate of this mother-to-be? What would you do?

What’s to be done is the challenge facing Hamilton and communities across Canada. The statistics are among the findings of Code Red, a groundbreaking analysis of life and death in 135 Hamilton neighbourhoods and census tracts. The multi-part series was written by Hamilton Spectator investigative reporter Steve Buist in collaboration with Neil Johnston, an epidemiologist and faculty member in McMaster University’s department of medicine.

The social determinants of health—income, housing, education, employment, early childhood development and race—divide us as certainly as any caste system. Where you sit on the income gradient sets your life course, determining how well you live and how soon you die. Divide Hamilton into income quintiles, and the average age of death for the wealthiest 20 per cent is 81.4 years. Death comes years earlier with each step down the income ladder. By the bottom rung, the poorest 20 per cent of Hamiltonians die at 69—12 years sooner.

Working on Code Red left Johnston feeling outraged at the waste of human potential, he said in a recent online presentation. He recalled how today’s hardest-hit inner-city neighbourhoods were thriving communities 40 years ago until the city was gutted by the decline of well-paying industrial, steel and manufacturing jobs, and by an exodus to the suburbs. “The chasm between neighbourhoods in the downtown core and the suburbs in determinants of health and health-service use is perhaps the single most important reason why Hamilton may never again be able to regain the relative prosperity it enjoyed 40 years ago,” he said.

The phenomenon isn’t unique to Hamilton. The district health unit in Sudbury, Ont., is a strong advocate for redefining what makes us healthy, and has compared the “most deprived” and “least deprived” areas of that city. Among the most deprived: births to teenage mothers were 205 per cent higher; infant mortality, 139 per cent higher; and premature death, 86 per cent higher. The health region in Saskatoon also looked at health disparities in their city. In six low-income neighbourhoods, rates of infant mortality were 448 per cent higher; teen births, 1,549 per cent higher; and suicide attempts, 1,458 higher. “Moral reasons aside, it is in our collective interest to reduce social disparity,” the health region concluded.

Focusing on non-medical social problems is a priority for the Canadian Medical Association (CMA), which advocates for a sustainable, equitable and more effective health care system. Health is more affected by socio-economic factors than by doctors, drugs and hospitals, CMA president Anna Reid, an emergency room doctor in Yellowknife, said in an interview. “We feel we have a responsibility—a duty, actually—to start advocating for policies that change people’s life circumstances.”

If society must be fixed in order to heal the individual, where does one begin? Reid concedes doctors don’t have the answers. “We’re not the experts on how to fix the housing crisis, [although] we certainly are the experts on seeing the downstream effects of people who have no housing,” she said. “We don’t know how to fix the education system, but we know that if you don’t have an education, this is what it’s going to do to your health.”

Studies find the problem is a lack of accountability and inadequate budgeting for such necessities as housing, education, social services, child care, policing and other non-health determinants, which rest with different levels of government, each responsible for one puzzle piece that rarely fits into a complete picture. Experts say it’s a jurisdictional nightmare and an excuse for inaction.

Dennis Raphael, a professor of health policy at Toronto’s York University, has written extensively on Canada’s missed opportunities and the false economy of neglecting the web of social determinants. Canadians are among the world’s leading researchers on issues such as the health effects of poverty on early childhood development, but the results are more likely to be implemented in Scandinavia and European countries like France and Germany, where the concept of a welfare state is not dismissed out of hand, Raphael says.

While Canada spends heavily on a health care system designed to fix the sick, it’s a middling performer among fellow wealthy nations in health outcomes and in value for money spent, according to a much-ignored 2009 Senate report, A healthy, productive Canada: a determinant of health approach. Fully 75 per cent of factors influencing health rest outside the health care system, it found. “Passively waiting for illness and disease to occur and then trying to cope with it through the health care delivery system is simply not an option.”

Sudbury’s is among the health units working to shift government priorities. It produced a short video, Let’s start a conversation about health . . . and not talk about health care, which has been picked up and modified by health authorities across Canada, says the unit’s Stephanie Lefebvre. As manager of health equity, one of Lefebvre’s roles is to bridge the divide among a range of services and to ensure that the potential health impacts of local initiatives are considered in advance.

In Hamilton, Code Red has inspired changes including implementation of a nurse-family partnership program to guide high-risk mothers, and incorporation of the implications of social determinants into McMaster University curriculums for health professionals. It influenced McMaster’s decision to build its new $86-million health campus in the inner city, where it will provide primary care to an underserved population and give medical students an understanding of the challenges residents face.

Mark Chamberlain, a successful Hamilton businessman and a member of the city’s round table on poverty reduction, knows many people who live in the city’s blighted neighbourhoods. “They’re fantastic people, but their health outcomes aren’t determined by how fantastic they are and how much they volunteer,” he says. “Once they know where a baby is born from a postal code perspective—based on not changing our scenarios in how we invest—they can pretty much predict the outcome of that child, when and how they’re going to die.”

It’s a glimpse of a future he can’t accept, and one he’d like to think there is growing determination to change.

The Hamilton town hall will be moderated by Maclean’s Ken MacQueen, with opening remarks by Dr. Anna Reid, CMA president. The panel features Debbie Sheehan, former director of Hamilton’s family health division; Dr. Dale Guenter, department of family medicine, McMaster University; Mark Chamberlain, member of the Hamilton round table for poverty reduction; and John Geddes, Maclean’s Ottawa bureau chief.




Browse

Where you live may decide how soon you die

  1. Bravo! Its about time these issues received the attention they deserve. Thank you Mr. MacQueen!

    Learn more: http://thecanadianfacts.org

  2. One would think dieing prematurely when living in Hamilton is a GOOD thing.

    • Pretty mindless comment, I must say.

  3. Perhaps companies, (City Hall included), should start not only looking at contracting the cheapest bidders, but make sure that the people who are working for this companies have health benefits! And not save a few dollars on a contract over the back of the employees!
    It doesn’t make sence, if you talk about poverty reduction, but turn a blind eye to the people who are working for you!

  4. The implication that is being made is that location imposes health outcome changes.

    What is far more likely, though, is that other factors influence both dwelling location and health outcomes.

    Having a poor education, for example, makes it difficult to have a high income level, which precludes both living in tony parts of town and spending lots of money on your own health care, as well as understanding how to take care of yourself.

    • Geography is more easily understood than ‘abstract’ concepts of power, influence, and class, but the ideas are the same: Societal and governmental interests favour the wealthy and powerful over the majority with associated health consequences.

      • It’s the willingness to pay for what you need that counts, not any sort of political status.

        Buy into your own care and good health instead of booze-and-smokes.

        • This is a naive and unsubstantiated view as to the extent to which one personally controls the determinants of health. Politics is who gets what, when, and how.

  5. “What if you knew one of the world’s most advanced acute-care health facilities was here in Hamilton’
    I would do like everyone else.
    Say to hell with the poor and make sure I made enough money anyway I could so that I was guaranteed treatment in McMaster University Medical Centre.

    • What are you saying? Did you read the article? The facilities are available to everyone. The article says `What if you knew one of the world’s most advanced acute-care health
      facilities was here in Hamilton, yet was powerless to change the fate of
      this mother-to-be? What would you do?’

      The point is being born in a segment of the population determines your life outcomes eg early death, chronic health problems, etc. In my experience, even if people escape their socio-economic birthplace, they still have many areas that they have no idea how to `fix’.

      Malnutrition in childhood, no dental care, no ongoing preventive care, no knowledge how to access services, difficulty receiving a good education (often because parents don’t know enough about the system or because they fail to value education or even because they are `school phobic’ themselves) impact on people for the whole of their lives. You can spend a lot of your life (and money), as an adult from a deprived background, just catching up and dealing with such things as dental repair and chronic health issues.

      • In some communities there are programs such as “Early Start” in Calgary, that identifies people like pregnant women at risk (just like you have described in your third paragraph). They pick them up as patients in their pregnancy and follow them through the birth of the child and then through the infant’s young life. Their sole goal to educate these women about preventative health and how to access services. They forge a link with the family that can be accessed as long as it is needed. The most important part of the whole process is ensuring that everyone who needs this extra help gets identified and hooked up with the resource.

        • Nice contribution.
          I would add that, beyond education, the vital role that is being played is support, which is sorely lacking in many communities – not just the disadvantaged ones. A supportive role also includes exchanging information, but it discards the condescending attitude that “educating” promotes.
          We all need support. Those who spend most of their waking moments in survival have less time to cultivate necessary supportive relationships.

  6. This article is important as it shows us how factors in our society, social and environmental determinants, have a profound impact on our health and well-being. If you are poor and do not have the financial means to purchase health care or adopt a healthy lifestyle, you are more likely to be predisposed to certain diseases and possibly die sooner from health-related illnesses than more affluent populations. We see life expectancy drop in impoverished areas among marginalized populations where access and the availability of health care services are absent or restricted. We should pay more attention to Dennis Raphael’s work about identifying and dealing with the social determinants of health. Until we do, our demand for health care treatment and service will continue to increase along with an increase in the cost of these programs. Our physical or social location in society and the social determinants of health, are equally important as environmental conditions. I have always looked at health based on environmental factors with increased exposure to toxic elements that are polluting our water, land, and atmosphere. Enough is enough! Social and environmental determinants are making people sick. Perhaps it is better if you are poor and unemployed. The bad news is that social determinants will likely have an impact on your overall health and wellness. However, you probably aren’t working in the Alberta oil sands and having direct exposure to the many toxins polluting the environment and impacting negatively on your health. As they say in real estate, location, location, location!

  7. Well nothing could really tell what lies ahead. A long as we live happy, we enjoy each and every minute in our life we eat healthy foods and we do regular exercise,,, there’s nothing to worry about! :)

    ______________

    CT Sealcoating

    • I agree with Sam to a certain extent and genes play an important role – along with luck!

      I think if your friends and family are healthy it should influence how you look after one self.

      Cas

      Business Consultant

      http://www.myclinic4men
      http://www.myclinic4women

    • “If you are poor and do not have the financial means to purchase health care or adopt a healthy lifestyle, you are more likely to be predisposed to certain diseases and possibly die sooner from health-related illnesses than more affluent populations.” by Dianne Snider in the comment above

      Try doing what you are without family or adequate social supports. That’s the point of the article.

  8. I believe this article needs more attention.

    Our society is attached to quick definable outcome rather than a positive long term goal. This information is not rocket science and is apparent going through many of the challenged neighborhoods or into local hospitals. The big problem is that there is plenty of money that can be made on allopathic medicine and not as much on prevention. But not only prevention of disease but prevention of many social maladies. If the money that we spend to “fix” things was spent on prevention, just think what a difference there would be in our society. I trust that as out information age grows so will the awareness of these issues and studies and our children will change how things are working. It certainly will not come from the top where the status quo and huge incomes are the most important thing to maintain. Change is coming and I am part of it.

    Please go to http://WWW.MankindProject.org and see how men are making a difference. First in themselves then in the world around them. Many thanks.

  9. environment and what kind of food that we eat is 2 factor that deside we sick or heathy

    _________________________________________asbes

  10. Ken, thanks a bunch for sharing such a thought-provoking post with us. I like the way you elaborated health and socio-medic aspects of our life. Godspeed

  11. I think properly train medical persons have everything to do in deciding what kind of care we receive. Although we have no way of really finding out how competent these individuals are because that stuff is hidden.

  12. Just to think of Hamilton and Sudbury makes me sick.I need 2 aspirins ASAP.

  13. Yes I like what is being said but also education on diet to prevent health issues is also needed. Not expensive diets but healthy ones that people can afford Recipes to be shared and workshops or education in early high school to give them the tools needed for healthy living. An ounce of Prevention is worth a pound of cure for less demand on our health care system.
    The Health Care System also needs to be updated as far as guides for food consumption with modern day scientific findings. Like Harvard and their research on low glycemic healthy eating to reduce obesity in children.

  14. what would the point view be of an anthropoligst plz help

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *