Canada sending CF-18s to bolster NATO response to Ukraine

Jets and ground support staff will be based in Poland


OTTAWA – Canada will contribute six CF-18 jet fighters to a NATO air-policing mission in response to the crisis in Ukraine, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Friday.

In addition, the military is sending up to 20 staff officers to bolster the Canadian presence at NATO headquarters in Brussels as the alliance organizes a further response.

NATO requested Canadian participation, the prime minister said.

“This is in response to the situation that is developing there and frankly more generally to the concern that we have on what really is expansionism and militarism on the part of Russia under the presidency of Mr. (Vladimir) Putin,” Harper said.

“I believe this to be a long-term, serious threat to global peace and security and we’re always prepared to work with our allies in NATO and elsewhere.”

The jets and their ground support staff will be based in Lask, Poland, where the U.S. is planning a major military exercise later this year. The air base, located southwest of Warsaw, is central and would allow the fighters to participate in a variety of missions.

The government did not say whether the CF-18s will join beefed-up patrols over the Baltic Sea, which are meant to reassure countries such as Estonia and Lithuania, or whether they will be flying along Poland’s border with Ukraine.

It is an important distinction, given the tensions in the region and the sporadic violence that has gripped the Ukraine-Russia border region.

The Canadian fighter jets will join warplanes from the United States, Britain, Denmark, Poland, Portugal and Germany, which will deploy in waves between now and the fall.

Harper did not say how long the Canadian deployment will last, or whether he will consult Parliament.

Although not bound by legislation, the Conservatives have made it a practice to ask for a vote in the Commons when military forces are placed in harm’s way.

The last time CF-18s were sent overseas in response to a NATO request was for the 2011 Libya bombing campaign. The question was put to MPs on both that mission and extensions to the Kandahar campaign in Afghanistan.

Harper did not consult Parliament on the recently concluded Afghan training mission, nor the 2013 transport aircraft sent to support French forces battling Islamic insurgents in Mali.

The air force has taken part in air patrols over the Baltic and Iceland as part of its regular NATO duties and for that reason defence expert Steve Saideman said he doesn’t think the prime minister would have to go to Parliament this time. However MPs should be consulted as the mission evolves, he added.

The absence of legislated democratic input is unsettling, especially in this day and age, said Saideman.

The British have been much more clear on Parliament’s role in overseeing both deployments and ongoing operations, something that has helped prevent missions from becoming political circuses, he added.

“Canada just has a tendency to not confront these challenges for a variety of reasons, but this kind of stuff; they just don’t want to face it,” he said.

On Wednesday, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, NATO’s secretary general, announced what was called a “reassurance package” for jittery east European members of the alliance.

Over the next few months additional air, sea and land forces will take up positions in former East Bloc countries.

Canada is also slated to take part in July in a long-planned, U.S.-led military exercise in Ukraine, known as Rapid Trident 2014, but the government has not detailed the size and scope of the country’s involvement.

Another defence expert recently questioned the Canadian military’s ability to mount sustained operations in eastern Europe or deploy follow-on forces, given that budget cuts at National Defence have taken a bite out of readiness.

Retired colonel George Petrolekas, speaking for the Conference of Defence Associations Institute, told the Commons defence committee that recent “cuts by stealth” have shown the Forces can no longer afford certain things or even maintain some of the things it has.

“Therefore when we come into issues such as the Ukraine, we now start scrambling for solutions because we just don’t have forces that are ready to go,” he testified last week.


Filed under:

Canada sending CF-18s to bolster NATO response to Ukraine

  1. This is what you get when your PM is bipolar.

    • This comment has been removed.

      • It’s not me that needs the medication. It’s Dear Leader….who’s in his manic phase at the moment.

      • You’re projecting………..take your lithium pill.

    • The Canadian fighter jets will join warplanes from the United States, Britain, Denmark, Poland, Portugal and Germany…..

      Sure are a lot of bipolar leaders out there.

      • Harpoon is doing the pushing….he has from the beginning.

        It’s not the routine NATO response ….it’s the foaming at the mouth.

        Even Flannagan, his best friend for years, says he’s bipolar.

        • So you mean after years and years of telling us all how Canada is losing its influence in the world because of Harper’s foreign policy incompetence, you’re now crediting Canada with single-handedly pushing the US, Britain, Denmark, Poland, Portugal and Germany towards a military response to the Ukrainian crisis? So which Emily are we to believe? The one who until now has insisted that a Harper-led Canada has no influence in the world anymore? Or the Emily who today tells us that Harper-led Canada is the driving force behind NATO’s recent actions? Both Emily’s can’t be right. You’ll need to pick one.

          • NATO makes a standard minor response….that was expected.

            Harpoon is foaming at the mouth. Cancelling meetings, pounding podiuims, sending planes…..he’s over the top.

            Manic phase.

        • Gee, I really am glad people like you are kept far from the levers of power.

          • ‘I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones’. – by Albert Einstein

    • Remeber bipolar, and Acting careers are very similar.
      Or, at worst, our PM is using this as a “photo-op”, on an international scale, no matter how it may affect Canadians, or even ukrainian lives, in the end…. :(
      Cooler heads need to prevail right now.

  2. This is a Russian /Ukrainian standoff or shootout. There’s no clear right or wrong here.
    We have no military to speak of.
    At one point Ukraine made the common sense request for a peacekeeping force under UN. That is something we might be able to with our well respected expertise. Canadians would support it.
    But a real all out war in Central Europe?
    Harper has been the hawk among more sensible western leaders, but he has nothing to back it up. Pointless political bluster.
    I hope the NDP or Libs show some sensible restraint.

    • -This is ALL nothing but a photo-op for Harpo and his faltering Cons.

      I can’t get over how Harper is embarassing us, and NATO, and America, …these days.
      I mean seriously, in the Afghan war you barely heard a peep out of him ?
      Obviously he couldn’t care less about Canadians and fixing Domestic issues here at home,…, and with that track record, why on earth would he even care about some Ukrainians ?
      I bet you Harpo couldn’t find the Ukraine on a map.

      Finally, it dawned on me, Cons are falling in the polls, this is all for a photo-op. -Harpo is an actor and nuthin’ more. He’s a mouth puppet for the other NATO members ? -I’m not quite sure yet. mmm,

      And/Or maybe NATO is using Harpo’s mouth, as a secret weapon against Putin ? mmm
      If so, then maybe Putin will finally give up, just from the sheer constant battering of Harpo’s boring-to-death, and grinding “rhetoric” :(. -the same that Canadians sadly have to put up with 24/7 here.

      • That photo flanked by military brass (4) was meant for us.

  3. Ask yourselvew one question: If NATO was only comprised of Canada, do you honestly think Harpo would be pretending to act so suicidally mouthy against Putin and Russia. ?
    Yes, I think NOT.

  4. Lefties can dish it out, but they sure can’t take it.

    No shortage of Leftist Mental Disorder on this thread.

    • wow, how eloquent of you, it almost sounds like a Rogers(CONS)/Macleans interview for whatever, by Paul himself, now doesn’t it ?

  5. I have a better idea!

    Why not a wrestling or boxing match between Putin and Harper to settle this ( Like the boxing match between Brazeau and Justin Trudeau) ?

    If Harper is not man enough to fight Putin, Justin would probably be only to happy to take on the challenge!

    If you agree, “Like” this comment or copy paste and tweet to all your friends!

Sign in to comment.