Christy Clark's B.C. Liberals fall after non-confidence vote - Macleans.ca
 

Christy Clark’s B.C. Liberals fall after non-confidence vote

The NDP seek a chance to govern after the B.C. Liberals are brought down after 16 years in power


 
B.C. Premier Christy Clark leaves after a news conference in Vancouver, B.C., on Tuesday May 30, 2017. (Darryl Dyck/CP)

(Darryl Dyck/CP)

VICTORIA – British Columbia’s minority Liberal government lost a non-confidence vote Thursday in the legislature, setting the stage for the NDP to govern or for another election.

No members of the legislature broke ranks as the Greens backed the New Democrats’ non-confidence motion to defeat Premier Christy Clark’s government.

The Liberals lost the vote 44-42. As the presiding officer in the legislature, the Speaker did not vote.

RELATED: How the B.C. Liberals squandered their chance to keep power

As Clark left the legislature, her supporters lined the hallway clapping and shaking her hand.

What happens now will be up to Lt.-Gov Judith Guichon, who has to decide whether to allow NDP Leader John Horgan to try to form government or dissolve the legislature, prompting an election.

Members of the NDP applauded and embraced each other after the vote.

Clark, whose Liberals have held power for 16 years, made an impassioned plea to members of the legislature before the vote.

In a bid to remain in power, the Liberals adopted NDP and Green promises from last month’s election in their throne speech including higher social assistance rates, banning corporate, union and third-party donations to political parties, spending more on childcare and increasing the carbon tax.

“When we go into political combat we all acknowledge that sometimes we spend so much time fighting with one another in here that it’s hard to listen to what British Columbians want. And the throne speech is an answer to that,” she said.

READ MORE: The foul cynicism of Christy Clark’s speech from the throne

“It’s an answer to what voters told us on May 9. It’s an acknowledgment, a sincere acknowledgment, that we didn’t get it right. It is an expression of renewed priorities based on what voters told us, including that they want us to work across party lines with one another.”

But the opposition parties signalled from the outset they had no intention of backing the Liberals, defeating two measures they had supported during the election.

The work of government has been in limbo for almost two months since the Liberals won a minority government with 43 members in the 87-seat legislature.

After the election, the NDP, with 41 seats, and the Greens, with three seats, signed an agreement to defeat the Liberals in a bid to put the New Democrats in power.

On Wednesday, Clark said she was ready to tell Guichon the legislature can’t work, if the lieutenant-governor asks for her opinion.

Her comments prompted ridicule and heated exchanges in the legislature Thursday.

Questions directed at Clark were all similar: why are the Liberals more interested in forcing an election than letting a new government get to work.

Clark suggested Green party Leader Andrew Weaver lied when he told voters he would work with all politicians in the legislature.

“He wasn’t telling the truth about that then and he isn’t telling the truth about what he is saying today,” Clark said to applause from the Liberals.

After the Speaker’s intervention, Clark withdrew her statement.

Weaver said it was time for the Liberal members to move to the opposition benches.

“They are acting like belligerent children as they’re going into that time out.”

MORE ABOUT CHRISTY CLARK


 

Christy Clark’s B.C. Liberals fall after non-confidence vote

  1. DON\T MESS WITH BC VOTERS…
    Did the Trans Mountain Expansion Pipeline (TMEP)project cause the BC Liberals to pay the ultimate political price ? The Liberals chose NOT TO LISTEN and lost key southern BC ridings…Now Premier elect Horgan gives fuzzy signals about TMEP…or will he and Weaver ‘figure it out ‘,and pave the way for the next election ,by supporting this economically vital export plan. Harper’s gone(remember him).Must we wait until Oct 2019 for the next ‘victim ‘ …or will PM Trudeau alter his maddening decision to approve the ill-conceived TMEP ?!
    The issue of concern always has been about that inevitable diluted bitumen (dilbit) spill as tanker traffic is increased 7 fold …thus greatly increasing probability of significant adverse impact on our multibillion dollar visitor ,environmentally related,job creating, ‘visitor’ industries !

    An opportunity still exists to earn those vital export revenues ….for all Canadians …simply by locating the dilbit shipping terminal where departing tankers would have open access to the Pacific.
    Simple as that !

    Carl Shalansky, P. Eng. (Retired)
    Blog: https://redfern3359.wordpress.com/
    (604) 986-4657