1

Four questions: Allen Hertzke on why Canada is better positioned than the U.S. to promote religious freedom

And on the difference between protecting it at home and advancing it abroad


 

Allen Hertzke is an internationally recognized expert on religion and politics, and a Presidential Professor of Political Science at the University of Oklahoma. He is the author of several books, including Representing Good In Washington, an award-winning analysis of religious lobbies; Echoes of Discontent, an account of church-rooted populist movements; and the co-author of Religion and Politics in America. His most recent book is Freeing God’s Children: The Unlikely Alliance for Global Human Rights.

Q: What can Canada expect to achieve by promoting religious freedom abroad?

A: The question can best be answered by posing it in another way: What can Canada contribute by promoting religious freedom abroad?Before Canada created its office, the United States operated the only diplomatic program explicitly charged with promoting global religious freedom, and its activities inevitably became bound up with its status as a superpower. Thus, critics see ulterior motives or find cases of inconsistency or hypocrisy where U.S. strategic interests clash with its human rights policies. Because Canada’s foreign policies are not tainted in this way, it is in a position to uphold international law on religious freedom with great clarity. By making this contribution, Canada will gain the admiration and respect of a growing global network of human rights groups, religious freedom advocates, scholars, religious dissidents, and heroes of conscience.

There is also a powerful national security rationale for supporting international religious freedom. We know from the latest research that militant religious movements and transnational terror networks spring from societies that deny religious rights or persecute religious minorities. In a world of fervent religion, the only antidote to violent fanaticism is expanding regimes of tolerance where religious energies are channelled into civil society engagement and healthy competition, where religious communities, in the words of the Qu’ran, can “vie one with another in virtue.”

Q: Would atheists be protected by Canada’s office?

A: Yes. The reigning document for international law on religious freedom, which Canada’s office will uphold, is Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states:

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

As is clear in this declaration, robust religious freedom recognizes the rights of persons to explore, question, or change their religion or beliefs. Not only does this declaration implicitly protect the rights of doubters or non-believers, but empirical evidence on the ground also suggests that religious skeptics are most safe where religious freedom is robustly protected. Atheists or questioners are most vulnerable in theocratic states like Saudi Arabia and Iran, or in autocratic regimes that curry favour with dominant religious communities to stay in power.

Q: Is there a difference between a government promoting religious freedom within its own borders and abroad?

A: Yes. There is a difference between a government protecting religious freedom within its borders—through constitutional or legal provisions—and advancing it abroad through diplomacy. The difference lies in the fact that a government is able to enforce domestic laws that protect the freedom of conscience, belief, and religious exercise, and by that means educate citizens about the value of toleration and pluralism. A nation does not have that enforcement power abroad, so it must rely on the diplomacy of moral suasion and appeals to the self-interest of other sovereign states. But a key lever is international law, which clearly establishes religious freedom as a universal right that all members of the United Nations are obligated to uphold.

Q: In establishing an Office of Religious Freedom, will the Canadian government implicitly place religious freedom above other human rights?

A: No, because human rights reinforce each other. Governments and international organizations launch all sorts of special human rights campaigns and programs—for women’s rights, workers’ rights, gay rights, children’s rights, refugee rights—so there is precedent for special emphasis. Moreover, the promotion of human rights internationally is always vulnerable to strategic calculations of nations, so to the extent that religious freedom advocacy brings new energy to rights campaigns, it will enhance the broader human-rights cause. Critics of the U.S. International Religious Freedom Act, which established the State Department Office, commonly expressed the concern that it would elevate religious freedom above other human rights. But eventually, secular human rights groups, such as Human Rights Watch, came to welcome the American initiative because it brought new religious allies to the human-rights cause.

Religious freedom is a potent human right because it encompasses so many other rights—the freedom of speech and assembly, of belief and conscience, the right to own property and form civil-society organizations, and the right of democratic participation. Moreover, we know from research by Brian Grim and Roger Finke that religious freedom vitally contributes to civil liberties, democratization, women’s status, economic development, inter-religious amity, civil peace, and regional stability. It is also a critical check on the abuse of state power, which was why James Madison and other formative thinkers viewed religious liberty as the “first freedom” worthy of its pride of place in the Bill of Rights.

The New Missionaries is a joint project between Maclean’s and OpenCanada.org, the Canadian International Council’s (CIC) hub for international affairs. Click here to learn more about the CIC.


 
Filed under:

Four questions: Allen Hertzke on why Canada is better positioned than the U.S. to promote religious freedom

  1. Allen Hertzke falls into the same dismissive approach as other apologists for promoting religion in other countries under the guise of religious freedom. He blithely assumes that because the intellectual astute recognize that freedom of religion should include freedom from religion–the right to not believe–that societies that recognize freedom of religion will respect  atheists’ rights.

    This is especially ironic because he is speaking about a country whose head of state, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II has recently publicly supported a UK Conservative Party official who has challenged a UK court that declared prayers at the beginning of public meetings are unconstitutional.

    At the same time every coin in the Canadian realm has “Elizabeth II Queen by the Grace of God” stamped on it, atheists can’t sing the national anthem without being hypocrites and religions are given favoured treatment under tax laws. 

    Perhaps one of the reasons that the Conservative government of Canada does not want to include non-believers in its OFR is that Canada would be one of the first places such an office would have to investigate.

    Doug Thomas
    President, Secular Connexion Séculaire
    secularconnexion.ca

Sign in to comment.