Seen and heard in the corridors of the Conservative convention - Macleans.ca
 

Seen and heard in the corridors of the Conservative convention

Stockwell Day: ‘This reality show unfortunately is going to be an ongoing distraction’


 

CALGARY – A flood postponed their convention in the spring — now Conservatives are facing a deluge of political challenges as they gather in the party’s heartland.

The ongoing Senate expenses scandal and allegations of a coverup at the most senior levels was a hot topic in the convention corridors, even if the upper chamber is not officially on the agenda.

“This reality show unfortunately is going to be an ongoing distraction, and that’s a cause for concern,” said former Conservative minister Stockwell Day.

“There’s a lot of anxiety about what that issue is doing to the party and its popularity, and it’s a no win, there’s really no win for anyone, it’s dragging everybody down and it would be nice to be able to move on from it,” said longtime party member Rick Perkins of Nova Scotia.

Retired Conservative Senator David Angus said he flew in from New Jersey specifically to hear what was going on with the issue, and was rankled by the suggestion that senators shouldn’t show up.

Former colleagues Pamela Wallin, Mike Duffy and Patrick Brazeau are facing a Conservative motion to suspend them from the Senate without pay, but divisions inside the Tory Senate caucus and motions from the Liberals have delayed a vote.

“I guess it’s turned into something that’s grown way out of proportion by mishandling and the unfortunate dealing with something that is now totally out of control,” said Angus.

“God only knows where it’s going to go.”

Caucus members and veteran Conservatives have expressed similar concerns that the Senate issue is not being handled well by Stephen Harper’s office. Information about his former chief of staff Nigel Wright’s $90,000 repayment of Duffy’s contested expenses has been revealed through the media, the police and Duffy himself, putting the party constantly on the defensive.

Angus added that he has concerns that the prime minister is not getting enough advice from seasoned hands, and is surrounded by too many inexperienced younger staff.

“You can’t have them running the country,” Angus said.

“The Nigel Wright thing, I was quite pleased when he came to Ottawa, I consider him a friend, but what experience really did he have? Did he have a team?”

Other delegates streaming into a convention centre at the Calgary Stampede fairgrounds said they hoped there was a way to get past the controversy.

Scott Lamb, a Vancouver delegate running for the party’s executive, said he felt Harper has been absolutely right about saying the senators should not be in the Senate.

“And these people haven’t taken the honourable way out and realized that Canadians do not want you in the Senate,” said Lamb. “The polls show that, the prime minister’s on the right side of the issue, and he’s been consistent throughout.”

Cabinet ministers who mixed with the rank-and-file in the room echoed the hope the party and the government could move on once a vote to suspend the three senators from the upper chamber concludes.

Junior Minister Maxime Bernier called the Senate issue a “grey cloud,” over the convention, that was monopolizing attention.

“I’m really anxious for the vote to take place and for there to be consequences,” said Heritage Minister Shelley Glover, who said she’s heard from people in her riding association about the Senate.

“The Canada-European Union trade deal has been overshadowed and it’s the greatest deal we’ve ever had, it’s going to offer so many opportunities…”

The roller-coaster ride in Ottawa hasn’t appeared to put a damper on registrations for the convention.

Party president John Walsh says despite the change in dates due to this spring’s flooding in Alberta, he predicts a record 3,000 people will attend Stephen Harper’s keynote speech Friday night.

Conservatives, particularly those with roots in the Reform and Canadian Alliance parties, have been known to be keen debaters on the party’s internal rules and on its policies.

In a departure from previous Conservative conventions, media were severely restricted from mixing with delegates at the convention centre, with security guards and volunteers enforcing reporter-free zone areas.

Several proposals for changes to the party’s constitution would put more power in the hands of the grassroots, including more oversight over the candidate nomination process.

A preliminary list of policy resolutions, to be debated in private sessions throughout the day on Friday, touched on a number of areas — notably on labour issues.

One proposal would require federally regulated unions to report annually on how much they spend on political donations and campaigns, and allow members to opt out of those expenses. Another would declare opposition to mandatory union memberships.

The Union of Canadian Correctional Officers held a protest outside the convention centre in response to the proposals.

“We’ve been villanized as unions time and time again by this government like we’re not taxpayers,” said President Kevin Grabowsky.

Some more controversial resolutions include one condemning sex selection during pregnancy — viewed by some as a tactic for reopening the abortion debate. There is also a motion to have the party rule out support for legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide.

There are several motions regarding firearms, including one that would allow Canadians to own any type of firearm — including handguns — unless the right is removed through due process.

Walsh says members are also anxious to start focusing on the election in 2015, the kind of field work in which the party has excelled in the past.

“This is an excellent refresher for our members and our movement to get together, talk ideas and get retooled in our thinking toward that election,” Walsh said in an interview.

“We pride ourselves in having the best (riding) ground organization in the country, and getting all of our key activists and volunteers in one place for discussions, for training, for resources…is extremely important for us as we gear up.”


 
Filed under:

Seen and heard in the corridors of the Conservative convention

  1. I’ve attended more than a dozen national conventions of the Liberals and Conservatives and former federal PCs. There have always been restricted zones — ones the media can’t go and ones the party rabble can’t go (e.g. for the latter, the huge media rooms, long ago filled with IBM Selectrics and reporters’ portables, all making a racket, for the former, some hospitality suites, corridors, rooms, seating sections, etc.). Badges have qualified media to different access — the Liberal goodbye to PET and hello to JT in 1984 was very restrictive — and kept non-delegate observers from occupying primo space. Odd that it’s even mentioned. These young reporters think anything unfamiliar to them is something new…

    It bodes well for the country that the governing party is so enthusiastic mid-term at a policy conference. Liberals have been in a malaise in theirs (think Fall of 1982 and you’ll remember why). Most of of their 2011 platform is in law, and what isn’t is in process or awaiting others. CETA is dynamite. The TPP is apparently on track. Many bilateral trade deals are on the books. 3Q growth is pushing 3% (the Americans would salivate at growth like that, and once did). Taxes down, unemployment down. NSA and Obamacare fiascoes likely to delay any US-EU equivalent of CETA so Canada may have a real window to be the hub that can serve both huge markets with few barriers — what should be a magnet for capital and growth where there’s cheap electricity (think Quebec), 12-month ports and/or excellent rail connections to coast and to U.S. Canada is on a roll. The Senate fooferaw will disappear shortly and within 14 months we’ll be in 2015. The ship of state and all the economic actors and indicators haven’t been so well aligned for Canada since maybe Laurier’s time when he proclaimed “the 20th Century belongs to Canada”. He was wrong, it belonged to mass killers and weapons of mass destruction but fewer world-shaking inventions than in the 19th Century when every paradigm shifted (think telephone, photography, steam engines, steamers, electricity, automobiles, and Canada leading the way with the world’s first commercial oil well and the revolution that led to). Canada is well-placed, and being well-positioned to compete in every sphere and is attracting strong immigrant streams, as we’ve always done, bringing with them work ethic and dreams. In this context, there couldn’t have been a better choice than Calgary for this gathering.

  2. The Conservative’s controversial resolutions like handguns for everyone and unions for none and restrictions on abortions one way or another remind us all that behind all the lies and corruption they’re still the party of the 19th century and should be relegated to it.

  3. The short-pantser. A truly horrifying Hallowe’en costume.

  4. If there were actually a trade deal it might be something worth crowing about. The Chief negotiator said “We are nowhere near a deal… I don’t know what all the fuss is about”. This has been a negotiation going on for years which will still go on for years.

    The only reason for Harper to showboat now was as a hopeful but failed diversion.

    Further, I have no problem with whatever appropriate discipline is applied to the Senators. But, the PM, the PMO, and a gaggle of senior Conservative caucus and party members are also knee deep in the muck… when and how will they be called to account?

  5. There are 2 types of Conservatives – those that want to hurt someone and those who want the government to do it for them. Harper in power enables the second.
    Today’s examples:
    1.Mean spirited, denial of natural justice re accused Senators

  6. 2. Create political weakness in your political opponents eg weaken unions

  7. Mr. Harper seems to have been taking some bad advice. Wallin and Duffy’s expenses were approved and paid. Even if the expense claims were not morally right they were approved under the old rules. Making new rules and applying them retroactively was an absurd thing to do. Even if the amounts do get repaid to the Senate the Conservative Party should still reimburse the senators for their already approved claims. This Lieberal – Conniveative [the Nutty Dizzy People are no better] crap has got to stop. There are real and growing problems in this country.

  8. As a small c conservative, not a right wing fundamentalist as holds sway in our party doesn’t anyone else take offense to how stupid the prime minister thinks we are. I mean really if he was your son, how proud could you be right now? My knuckles may be low but my eyebrows aren’t.