The cultural meaning of the Vimy memorial - Macleans.ca
 

The cultural meaning of the Vimy memorial

The chief historian at the Commonwealth War Graves Commission on how and why we remember the battle


 
A picture shows the Canadian National Vimy Memorial in Vimy, near Arras, northern France, on April 9, 2017, during a commemoration ceremony to mark the 100th anniversary of the Battle of Vimy Ridge, a World War I battle which was a costly victory for Canada, but one that helped shape the former British colony's national identity. (Philippe Huguen/AFP/Getty Images)

A picture shows the Canadian National Vimy Memorial in Vimy, near Arras, northern France, on April 9, 2017, during a commemoration ceremony to mark the 100th anniversary of the Battle of Vimy Ridge, a World War I battle which was a costly victory for Canada, but one that helped shape the former British colony’s national identity. (Philippe Huguen/AFP/Getty Images)

Dr. Glyn Prysor is the chief historian at the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, an organization that was created in 1917 at the end of the First World War because, in his words “it was thought that the graves of those who lost their lives shouldn’t be allowed to disintegrate.”

I met him during Sunday’s commemoration ceremony for the battle of Vimy Ridge. In a media tent packed out with Canadian press, radio and TV journalists, Prysor was an English anomaly in a perfectly tailored navy wool suit. He’s in his mid-30s—quite young for his very sobering job title—and offered excellent historical context and commentary during the three-hour-long ceremony.

Prysor received his PhD from Oxford and now finds himself in charge of maintaining the graves and memorials for the 1.7 million who died in the first and second world wars. “We have graves in 157 different countries,” he said. “We make sure they are maintained and are involved in the planning of ceremonies like this one.”

Memorials, he pointed out, are a key factor in how a culture forms its own history. “It’s a physical reminder of what happened. And it’s also a very important part of how we remember things.”

The arresting and eerily beautiful monument at Vimy Ridge is a case in point. Would this battle have come to take such an honoured place in the Canadian national consciousness if the soaring memorial, built over 11 years by designer Walter Seymour Allward, had never been built? It seems unlikely.

Opened by King Edward VIII (in his brief role as monarch) in July 1936, Vimy then fell into German hands during the Nazi occupation of Germany during the Second World War. When the allied forces prevailed, General Montgomery used newsreel footage of the reclamation of Vimy as a symbol of victory.

In the latter part of the 20th Century, however, the Canadian memorial fell into a state of disrepair.

“It was semi-forgotten and then in the 1990s it became popular again and since then there’s been a lot of money put into it,” says Prysor. The reason for the resurgence of interest in Vimy, he says, was a series of linked events. The first was the 1986 publication of Pierre Berton’s book Vimy which became a historical bestseller in its time and captured the world’s imagination. Another was the resurgence of interest in what Prysor calls “family history,” by which he means aging baby boomers with travel budgets flying overseas in order to research their family trees or to pay respects to a relative who fought in one of the two world wars.

And with public interest, followed public funds. Successive Prime Ministers Jean Chretien, Martin, Stephen Harper and Justin Trudeau all were committed to keeping the monument pristine for what is now a steady stream of Canadian tourists and school trips.

Though the battle at Vimy has, over the century since its occurrence, come to symbolize Canadian unity and ingenuity—the much-vaunted birth of a nation—in fact it is just a battle among many battles in which the Canadian troops fought with astonishing and nation-making bravery, and usually along side their allies. “Canadians were not the only ones who fought at Vimy, far from it,” Prysor points out. “And they also played a huge part of Ypres, Somme, Passchendaele and the advance of the Western Front in 1918.”

Prysor calls it “a watershed moment, but certainly not the whole story.”

While the cultural dominance of Vimy does irk some in the historical community, for Prysor, it serves as reminder of the importance of his job. If cultural myths are made through monuments then it’s no wonder Vimy is ours.

Check out archival images from the battle:

MORE ON VIMY RIDGE:


 

The cultural meaning of the Vimy memorial

  1. Oh enough with Vimy…..it was a century ago, and no one cares anymore.

    Put the effort into preventing future wars.

    • Emilyone

      See my response about the significance of sculptures on the Vimy memorial and another memorial I write about and placed on my website. These are usually meant to be about peace rather than war. This should be the emphasis of the memorial, in my view, not the importance of the man who looks after it.

  2. Emily…You seem to have forgotten the old saying that those that forget history are condemned to repeat it. Remembering the misery, horror and loss of past wars should dissuade us from embarking on that path again at least as much as palavering around a table. And we should care. It is only by understanding the context of that time that we can avoid making the same stupid mistakes again.

    • Quite so, Stan.
      People who grew up in the post- WW2 world tend to regard today’s Europe as the normal state of things, where international battles are bureaucratic and political. Too easy to forget that the European Steel and Coal Community, direct parent of the EC and EU, was formed (in 1952) explicitly to break the cycle of war that had plagued Europe for generations.
      Countries can still, and do regularly, fall into the old traps, electing populist leaders who then take their countries into war. We need to be periodically reminded of the usual outcome.

      • Thank goodness those ‘populist’ leaders, by and large, lead their nations off to war on the old ‘imperial’ model. Where the damage is done safely out of sight and hopefully out of mind. Hell even the military aren’t overly troubled by foreign deployments, which in past times could have lasted a decade or longer, rather than a few ‘long’ or ‘short’, depending, months.

  3. Vimy has to be the most ‘beautiful’, if that word applies, or all the war monuments ever erected. Hopefully it may match, in durability, the arches and columns we can still see, raised to celebrate the Roman military heritage.

    It is indeed remarkable that there was something it touched in the teutonic soul that dissuaded them from destroying it when they occupied France, and Vimy Ridge, in 1940. Had it been more about ‘victory’ and less about ‘sacrifice’ – we might have been marking this occasion amid its rubble.

  4. It’s disappointing to see the memorial celebrated as the high point (sorry about that), when there may also be other reasons Vimy has become a cultural phenomemon for Canadians. Sure, some boomers may have started visiting the site, and that may be one reason Vimy became important. But I’m not sure I agree with the final sentence in the article:

    “If cultural myths are made through monuments then it’s no wonder Vimy is ours.” Should this statement have appeared at the beginning of the article? What about the sculptures that I saw on tv. I did come across this site that explains them:
    The Sculptures on the Vimy Memorial – Canadian War Museum (no link here as I am having trouble getting my posts published).

    Or are we supposed to be celebrating Dr. Glyn Prysor, who looks after the monuments.

    I find the symbolism of monuments and statues far more interesting. And as it happens, my own interest in the culture of Vimy came about through personal experience, of realizing that I had once met the widow of a fallen soldier at Vimy without knowing the significance of his death, or of the life she had not chosen to live, with an infant daughter.

    Yes, I would have liked to see more on the symbolism of Allward’s sculptures. A few years ago I wrote about a particular war memorial located in England, focusing on the statues and their significance – a male statue – standing for manhood, and a female one, standing for peace and womanhood. See online, An end to hatred and injustice – SAMcPherson.

    This article has missed the point completely. The monument could just as easily be seen as reflecting our culture as being the origin of it.