The 50 most important people in Canada

Find out who made our list — and why


The cover of the Dec. 2 issue of Maclean’s.

Defining power is almost as hard as acquiring and keeping it. Being able to command the spotlight is often an attribute of the powerful, but so too is a knack for operating from the shadows. We tend to closely associate wealth and power, but it would be foolish—and boring—to ignore the clout of those whose paycheques wouldn’t be all that impressive, whether public servant or priest, creative thinker or cultural arbiter. Presiding over the pinnacle of a hierarchy might seem like the common condition of the powerful, until someone inevitably mentions one of those intriguingly influential loners, iconoclasts or introverts.

Keeping all these intriguing contradictions and counterbalances in mind, writers and editors at Maclean’s who cover the Canadian scene compiled the Power List with three broad concepts in mind: institutional clout, capacity for innovation and timeliness. Viewing the 50 fascinating individuals who made our final cut through these three lenses is the best way to impose some order in what might appear to be a dizzyingly diverse bunch. Beside each name, you’ll see three icons.

This symbol indicates our assessment of the individual’s institutional standing. For instance, the Prime Minister scores the maximum five because he runs the whole federal government. On the other hand, we were intrigued by a certain creative marketing mind. But, hey, an ad agency isn’t an establishment corporation or a sprawling public sector institution, so he ranks just one blue pillar icon.

This tells you how much weight we assign to a given individual based on the inescapable fact that were compiling this list in late 2013 with a weather eye to 2014. Power must have events through which to express itself. Thus, individuals associated with the upcoming Winter Olympics in Russia rank five clocks—and probably wouldn’t make next year’s list at all. By contrast, a banking watchdog rates just two, although we’ll wish we’d assigned more if, heaven forbid, another financial crisis hits anytime soon.

Power, in the broadest and perhaps best sense, often flows from ideas. The guy who’s taking a serious shot at making quantum physics make money? We assign him the full five. But a prime-ministerial aide whose undeniable power comes from loyalty to the boss and longevity in high places? Just one.

You disagree? We also claim there’s power in the ability to start an argument. JOHN GEDDES

2013’s Power List

01. Stephen Harper
02. Nenshi
03. Dias
04. Wiseman
05. Charbonneau
06. Novak
07. Weston Jr.
08. Trudeau
09. Dickson
10. Laziridis
11. Butts
12. McLachlin
13. Mulcair
14. Moore
15. Clark
16. Peladeau
17. Laureen Harper
18. Kenney
19. Pourbaix
20. Byrne
21. Caira
22. Yzerman
23. Conway
24. Merklinger
25. McCartney
26. Fortier
27. Flaherty
28. Poilievre
29. Manning
30. Lisée
31. Redford
32. Poloz
33. Ferguson
34. Blais
35. Oliver
36. Jenkins
37. Lawson
38. Ouellet
39. Atleo
40. Keller
41. Keesmaat
42. Ghomeshi
43. Drake
44. Brabant
45. Southern
46. Gomes
47. Chow
48. McCaughey
49. Edwards
50. Bronfman

01: Stephen Harper
Power under pressure


Even wheeling his arms like a cartoon character executing an endless pratfall, Stephen Harper still controls the fates of so many other figures in Ottawa that he remains kingpin. He shuffled his cabinet, ending the ministerial careers of Vic Toews, Ted Menzies, Diane Ablonczy and Peter Kent. He flew to Brussels the day after the Throne Speech and clinched a trade deal with Europe. In Calgary, meeting wary delegates at the Conservative party convention, he said little about the Senate expense scandal that has all but ruined his 2013 and cost him a trusted confidant, his former chief of staff Nigel Wright. What he did say sounded for all the world like a decision to abandon any ambition for serious Senate reform. Instead he listed his government’s accomplishments—the end of the long-gun registry and the Wheat Board monopoly; a plan for free choice in cable-TV channel selection—that should ensure his base stays loyal.

Sure, the Senate scandals and his inability to get a Keystone XL decision out of Barack Obama robbed his post-2011 majority mandate of grace. In front of him in the House he faces Tom Mulcair and Justin Trudeau, two different kinds of formidable competition. But he has assets, foremost being a relatively strong economy. His finance minister, Jim Flaherty, promises a balanced budget by 2015. That would allow Harper to promise billions in tax cuts. Trudeau and Mulcair will argue for a busier federal government; Harper will run on the price of his rivals’ ambitions. Fronting a saloon band in Calgary after his convention speech, Harper sang a string of old hits. One of them was Takin’ Care of Business by BTO. Harper’s business is winning, and he does not intend to stop doing that just yet. PAUL WELLS

02: Naheed Nenshi
Like he can walk on water


When Naheed Nenshi’s name comes up, Torontonians have only one question: When is he coming to save us? When Calgary’s charming, straight-shooting progressive mayor visits Toronto now, he is greeted with an affection that borders on the riotous. Even fairly conservative Torontonians seem to feel that the Toronto-born Nenshi somehow must have been misplaced or distracted on his natural path to leadership of their city. “We don’t need him full-time,” pleads Kelly McParland on the National Post’s website. “One week a month should do it.”

Albertans laugh about this—even the ones who do not like Nenshi have to laugh. But there is a certain validity to Torontonians’ feelings that they could have had Nenshi to themselves if history had panned out just a little differently. “I spent most of my 20s based in Toronto,” the newly re-elected mayor notes as he prepares to dart back briefly into the city of his birth for a conference.

After Nenshi finished his master’s degree from Harvard in public policy, he worked for McKinsey, the somewhat cult-like international business consultancy that recruits high-IQ graduates to visit institutions, study them for a few weeks, and tell them what they’re doing wrong. Being at McKinsey is a bit like special-forces training for business leadership—but you can also learn a lot about non-profits and government agencies, if that is where your heart lies. Pretty soon Nenshi had graduated from the cult, as its young associates are expected to, and was doing his own consulting work for retailers and bankers.

But the gravitational effects of family kept pulling Nenshi back to Calgary, where he had grown up and where his parents and his sister were still entrenched. He moved back into Cowtown almost on a whim in the autumn of 2001, turning his Toronto apartment over to a cousin and having his personal effects shipped to his parents’ basement. He quickly became embroiled in a controversy over the proposed privatization of the city’s power interests, and he spent the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, in an extremely awkward public hearing at City Hall, choosing to attend because no one seemed to know whether it ought to be cancelled. “The news on TV was too terrifying to contemplate anyway,” he recalls. “Everybody was so shell-shocked.”

Sept. 11 brought on “a period of underemployment” for Nenshi as his jet-setting consulting work dwindled temporarily. Before long he was back in the game, at one point working for the UN and spending three weeks out of every four in New York City. “Eventually my father got really sick and I got one of those ‘You’d better come home right now’ phone calls,” Nenshi says. “And I decided it was better to be actually rooted in a place—that I wanted to be part of Calgary for good. That’s when it really stuck.”

That’s not good news for anyone hoping for Nenshi to burst out of Calgary onto the national scene. The government of Calgary has just switched to four-year terms for its mayor and council, and Nenshi’s re-election campaign was dogged by rumours that he may turn his sights elsewhere before he completes a second stint. He has always denied them flatly. Such denials don’t normally carry much weight, but Nenshi speaks with surprising passion of municipal government, just as Peter Lougheed, another much-solicited national saviour figure from Calgary, once praised provincial government as the most fulfilling field of political activity.

“I always say that if the federal government just disappeared while we were talking, it would probably take you a couple of weeks to really notice,” Nenshi observes. “If the provincial government disappeared, you would need a few hours, maybe a day, to become aware of it unless you were in school or in a hospital. But if the municipal government disappeared, there go the traffic lights, the water, the electricity, the gas . . . you would, frankly, notice pretty quickly because you might be dead.”

Maybe Nenshi’s innermost ambitions do run higher than Calgary City Hall. It’s worth remembering, though, that he is keen on making City Hall itself much more powerful. Along with the city of Edmonton, Calgary is close to a deal with the province on a pair of “city charters” that would devolve more responsibilities explicitly onto the municipal governments along with a slice of tax revenue. Both cities have ambitious multi-decade transit plans and have pretty much tapped out their own property tax base covering operating costs.

Nenshi and others have spitballed giving the big cities their own earmarked taxes. He is downplaying that concept for now, but there is an urban consciousness-raising under way in Alberta. Demographic change is threatening the great tradition of hinterland Alberta playing the cities against one another, keeping them in a state of constant uproar over which one is daddy’s favourite. Albertans who live and pay their taxes downtown are starting to realize that having municipal governments for both small towns and counties is one of history’s greatest jobs-for-the-boys scams. There is an awareness that Alberta cities have been abused for a long time on highway spending, industrial taxation and health budgets.

Rebalancing the Alberta treasury is worthy of Naheed Nenshi’s attention, and it requires the kind of public-policy training he has, but if he were to depart for a different scene too early it might all come to naught.

Moreover, it is surprisingly hard to specify a concrete scenario for a next political step. Nenshi’s chief of staff and close confidant Chima Nkemdirim helped found the Alberta Party as a vaguely progressive alternative in provincial politics, but so far it has been a flop. Nkemdirim is rumoured to be eyeing one of the downtown federal Liberal nominations, but it is hard to imagine Nenshi personally giving up the comfortable mayor’s chair to carry a battle standard for Justin Trudeau. The previous two Calgary mayors were both popular Liberals who were constantly rumoured to be on the verge of bolting, but when they tired of the gig, well, it turned out there were much easier ways to have a nice life in Calgary than running against Conservatives there.

Anyway, he is still having enormous fun as a mayor, or at least that is the overwhelming impression he gives in conversation. Asked about frontline services, he goes on a gleeful 10-minute tangent about putting GPS units on the city’s snowplows. “We created a website that shows in real time, after a snowstorm, which streets have been plowed and which ones are being plowed,” he says. “It sounds like feel-good window dressing, but it became the most-visited page on the city’s website awfully quickly. The ability to check road conditions before you leave the house turns out to have a discernible safety impact, and there’s a cost saving in phone calls and complaints. If you’re mad and you want to know where the snowplows are, you can literally go look.” He does this a lot himself, he adds.

Nenshi’s re-election campaign turned a bit ugly when it became public knowledge that real estate developers were organizing against him. He has been berated as a “socialist” because he is reluctant to let new insta-neighbourhoods keep hooking up to Calgary’s service grid—at Calgary’s expense—until they stretch to the outskirts of Butte, Mont. Note, however, that his long-standing position on the eternal “secondary suites” fight that sometimes dominates Calgary headlines is the libertarian one. He wants to relax zoning rules so homeowners with spare room can rent to new-arriving workers who don’t need much; this would, as a side effect, bring thousands of existing illegal suites back under landlord-tenant law. If this is socialism, it’s a curiously Cato Institute-friendly species of it.

Nenshi may or may not be the most popular individual politician in Canada right now—is there another candidate?—but the developers’ campaign against Nenshi-friendly councillors was not totally ineffective, and the balance of power on council remains about as even as it was before October’s vote. The mayor has explicitly put his secondary-suite crusade in abeyance while the new council continues to deal with the aftermath of the spring floods. Calgary columnists gave Nenshi the stink eye when he broke with tradition and endorsed all the incumbent councillors, without distinction, in the election—even the ones identified as anti-Nenshi good guys by the developer cabal.

The feeling seemed to be that it was a stunt designed to prop up Nenshi’s beleaguered friends on council. But what was stopping him from just doing that explicitly and letting the developer-certified councillors take their chances? Far be it from us to accuse a politician of telling the simple truth, but Occam’s razor suggests Nenshi may actually appreciate some give-and-take in the makeup of his council.

“I think I’m unusual in that when I bang the gavel to start a meeting, I actually have no idea what’s going to happen,” he says. “Sure, by noon most days I regret that the council doesn’t just do what I told them to. Our meetings go on forever because people are actually listening to one another and changing their opinions. It’s a bunch of good-natured people arriving at a decision, and as mayor I go before the cameras and defend that decision even if I didn’t agree with it.” Among his staff, Nenshi jokes, the firm rule is that the mayor is always right; but that rule is law only as far as the door of his office. Beyond that threshold, he’s just another Calgarian. COLBY COSH

03: Jerry Dias
Merger makes him strong

As the president of Unifor, the mega-union created this year by the merger of the Canadian Auto Workers and the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers, Dias is expected to halt, or even reverse, the decline in Big Labour’s clout. He’s promised to organize workers not usually brought under the umbrella of industrial unions. For now, he leads an impressive 300,000-plus membership across two dozen economic sectors, mainly in manufacturing, communications and transportation. A native of Burlington, Ont., Dias follows in the footsteps of his father, a union local leader at de Havilland, now owned by Bombardier. The junior Dias’s first job was delivering parts around that plant. He soon became a shop steward. His ascent to the top of the union hierarchy is now complete. The question is: What will Dias do with a position that is, arguably, unprecedented in Canadian union history? JG

04: Mark Wiseman
His clout, your money

As president and CEO of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Wiseman presides over a $183-billion portfolio that amounts to the national nest egg: 18 million Canadians need him not to screw up. That doesn’t mean his investment decisions are always dull. He’s cut a deal, for example, with Formula One racing. And he fought Barrick Gold over what he saw as an excessive signing bonus for a corporate executive. At just 43, Wiseman stands to be a major figure in Canadian business for decades to come. JG

05: France Charbonneau
Cleaning up corruption

For several days this past spring, Frank Zampino was the picture of sour-faced indignation. An accountant by trade and elbows-first politician by instinct, Zampino spent 22 years in Montreal politics, including seven as president of the city’s executive committee. Since retiring in 2008, Zampino has been charged with fraud, conspiracy and breach of trust for an alleged lowball sale of city land to a favoured contractor.

This wasn’t the source of Zampino’s ire. Rather, it was being compelled to answer questions as a witness of Quebec’s commission into the province’s construction industry, chaired by Superior Court Judge France Charbonneau. Faced with damning evidence from his City of Montreal agenda, which listed meetings with allegedly mobbed up construction magnates, Zampino questioned the authenticity of the documents.

France Charbonneau clicked on her microphone angrily. “Are you suggesting the documents were falsified?”

Zampino, flustered, said something about the entries “not reflecting reality.”

“Oh really?” Charbonneau said, chuckling. When Zampino blubbered something else, she cut him off. “I’m going to assure you right now, Mr. Zampino, there was no falsification or crookedness on the part of the commission,” she said, clicking off her microphone with a stab of her finger.

For a raft of Quebec politicians, fundraisers, bureaucrats, construction company owners, union leaders, alleged mobsters and the occasional lawyer, an indignant Charbonneau has become a familiar, frightful sight. Officially known as the“commission of inquiry into the granting and management of public contracts in the construction industry,” the Charbonneau commission—and, especially, Charbonneau herself—has come to represent Quebec’s collective disgust with corrupt elements within it.

Having a judge—a woman, no less—dress down the alleged pillars of Quebec’s corruption-laden status quo on live TV has had a cathartic effect, and enthralled much of Quebec’s male commentariat. “She is a sphinx who devours the victims in front of her,” communications specialist Bernard Motulski said in a radio interview in June.

In short, Charbonneau has immense power, through both the wide mandate of the commission and her crusader status. On leave from the Superior Court, Charbonneau has all the legal powers of her former day job, including the right to compel testimony from uncooperative types like Zampino. At the same time, though, some wonder whether Charbonneau’s attack on Quebec’s government and construction industry has convicted individuals before their day in court—that her pursuit of justice is fuelled in part by a desire to satisfy the public’s lust for blood. “She convicts people with her eyebrows,” says one political organizer.

To be sure, the commission was formed in the crucible of widespread public outrage at the then-governing Liberals. For years, allegations surrounding the party’s fundraising apparatus, and its ties to construction and engineering firms, trickled out. Premier Jean Charest rebuffed calls for an inquiry into the construction industry, claiming it would imperil police investigations. For the opposition and a large swath of the public, it was proof the Liberals had something to hide.

Bowing to pressure, Charest called an inquiry in October 2011, naming Charbonneau as its head at the suggestion of Superior Court Chief Justice François Rolland. Originally Charest didn’t plan to give her the power to subpoena witnesses, but after two weeks of criticism he relented.

These powers put Charbonneau, a crown lawyer for 25 years before becoming a judge in 2004, in her element. She filled the commission with like-minded prosecutors and began pursuing the biggest players in the industry, and the bureaucrats and politicians who allegedly worked with them. “What became clear was her experience and understanding of how organized crime establishes itself and spreads,” says a former Charest adviser. “Because there were so many police investigations, we needed someone who wouldn’t infringe on the work of police.”

Charbonneau certainly had a keen understanding of how law enforcement worked. As a prosecutor she’d overseen 80 trials, including some of Quebec’s most high-profile cases. She successfully prosecuted Patrick Moïse for the 1989 murder of a gay CEGEP student, one of Canada’s first documented cases of sexuality-based hate crimes. She was also prosecutor in the murder trial of Robert Leblanc, accused of killing 22-year-old Chantal Brochu in 1992. Charbonneau knew Leblanc was guilty—he’d admitted as much to a judge in pretrial testimony—yet had to convince an unknowing jury of his guilt. It worked: Leblanc remains in jail.

Charbonneau’s reputation as a steely prosecutor was cemented with her conviction of Maurice “Mom” Boucher, one of Quebec’s most notorious criminals. Boucher, a leader of Quebec’s “Nomad” chapter of the Hells Angels biker gang, was arrested on charges stemming from the murder of two prison guards in 1997. Charbonneau, who wasn’t the lead prosecutor in the case, could only watch as a smirking Boucher was found not guilty the following year. Charbonneau pushed for and secured an appeal on the condition she be the lead prosecutor. It was a difficult case, and not only because she was the subject of death threats. Boucher wasn’t at the scene of the crime, but had ordered underlings to do the deed. Charbonneau argued Boucher demanded absolute loyalty from his charges—including Stéphane Gagné, a Hells Angels hanger-on turned police informant who testified he received orders from Boucher to kill the guards.

Her gambit worked: Boucher looked stunned as he was found guilty in May 2002. “People can have confidence in their justice system,” Charbonneau told reporters.

She won that case in part by attacking the credibility of Boucher’s lawyer, Jacques Larochelle—a man filled with “scorn, disgust and condescension,” Charbonneau told the jury. She also admonished presiding judge Pierre Béliveau for chuckling during arguments, insinuating he favoured the defence.

Shades of prosecutor-era Charbonneau are on offer in her current role. “Are you an imbecile and incompetent?” she asked witness Robert Marcil last February, after the former public works director uttered his umpteenth “I can’t remember.” She reminded reluctant witness Nicolo Milioto he didn’t “get to determine the pertinence of the questions” when the construction executive balked at commenting on his ties to the Rizzuto crime family. As with Zampino, her admonishments were delivered with sang-froid—and, yes, often with an incredulous arched eyebrow.

It has led some in the legal community to wonder whether Charbonneau and the commission lawyers are playing for the camera. “This kind of thing would not be allowed in a courtroom,” says one lawyer representing a commission witness. The lawyer related how two investigators showed up at the client’s law offices. “One, trying to encourage the client to testify before the commission, said, ‘Your client has every interest in testifying before the television.’ I asked him if he meant commission, which was, of course, what he had intended to say. It was hard to know if it was a slip of the tongue, or if, for him, the words had become interchangeable.”

The commission’s roughly 20 inspectors make pains to verify and cross-check witnesses. But mistakes have slipped through. Martin Dumont, an organizer with former Montreal mayor Gérald Tremblay’s Union Montréal, testified about a secretary having to count $850,000 in cash donations to the party—a story he later admitted was false. Dumont also testified he was in a room when a union representative made reference to Tremblay while discussing the party’s “unofficial” donor lists. Though Dumont maintained the story was true, he only remembered Tremblay’s presence after meeting with commission investigators. Tremblay denied the allegations; nevertheless, he resigned within days.? By and large Montrealers didn’t spare a thought for their long-suffering mayor. Mostly they were just happy to see him go, and gave the credit to Charbonneau herself. “Charbonneau benefits from the cynicism people have toward the political and business class,” says Pierre Tremblay, a professor of political science at Université de Québec à Montreal. “She has incredible powers as well as a very favourable climate in which to use them.”

Charbonneau is expected to table her report in early 2015. For good or ill, it’s perhaps her most powerful achievement: from mobsters to politicians, she has just about everybody worried. MARTIN PATRIQUIN

06: Ray Novak
Others come and go

When Nigel Wright revealed his role in the repayment of Mike Duffy’s expenses—a scheme the Prime Minister recently described as a deception—Stephen Harper turned to the one person he should be able to trust: the aide who has been by his side for a dozen years, the one who, famously, lived in the loft above the garage at Stornoway when Harper was leader of the opposition. Once Harper’s executive assistant, Novak had risen to the position of principal secretary and carried a reputation as a discreet and loyal operator who could get things done. Other than Laureen, nobody knows the Prime Minister better than the loyalist who’s now his chief of staff. AARON WHERRY

07: Galen Weston Jr.
His choice is empire-building

With his $12.4-billion bid for Shoppers Drug Mart Corp., the boss of Loblaw Companies Ltd. and scion of one of Canada’s biggest family fortunes served notice he wouldn’t be a stand-pat heir and President’s Choice TV shill. The deal, if it goes through, gives Canada a homegrown, credibly scaled rival to the likes of Target Corp., which plans to open 124 stores in Canada this year, and Wal-Mart, which continues to rapidly expand its Canadian operation, not to mention the next wave of entrants, such as Nordstrom, the American department store that’s coming soon. Weston has his work cut out for him, but his audacious deal with the country’s largest drug retailer, plus the success of his Joe Fresh clothing line and the lasting appeal of PC products, gives the bespectacled billionaire a fighting chance. JG

08: Justin Trudeau
Beyond his famous name

Last time, we put Trudeau on the list primarily on the strength of his social media presence, especially his Twitter following. Now, as Liberal leader, he’s keeping his party near the top of opinion polls. His ability to dictate the public debate—as he did over the summer by talking about marijuana, both having smoked it and wanting to legalize it—is currently unrivalled. But as his showing during the Senate scandal demonstrates, he faces a steep learning curve on the floor of the Commons. JG

09: Julie Dickson
Domestic clout, global influence

While heading the federal Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, Dickson has emerged as a star among international advocates of tougher banking regulation in the wake of the 2008 global credit meltdown. She’s due to end her seven-year term at OSFI next year, but that leaves plenty of time for Dickson to stare down financial-institution bosses who’d like to be a bit more freewheeling. She wields power over Canadian mortgage markets and bank capital requirements, and her voice is heard far beyond Canada’s borders—wherever debate rages about how to prevent another global banking crisis. JG

10: Mike Lazaridis
Sounds a bit like Lazarus

These days Mike Lazaridis keeps an office in a three-storey building in the University of Waterloo’s sprawling and non-descript industrial research park. The deposed BlackBerry founder’s business card carries the name of his holding company: “Infinite Potential Group.” The name sounds designed to be meaningless until you realize Lazaridis means it at face value. The group he is assembling really does have infinite potential.

To get an interview with Lazaridis I pestered him for three months through intermediaries who made me promise I would ask no question about BlackBerry, the company he co-founded, lost and is, reportedly, trying to buy back. I didn’t mind. BlackBerry is hardly the only thing on his plate now. Lazaridis is on the hunt for vastly bigger game than smartphones.

“What a few of us are saying is, there’s a potential here for a new paradigm, the next quantum revolution,” Lazaridis said.

Around Waterloo, Ont., Lazaridis and a few associates have started calling the region west of Toronto the “Quantum Valley,” a conscious echo of Silicon Valley in northern California. There, beginning in 1957, a few refugees from Bell Labs launched the global semiconductor industry, whose total value half a century later is measured in trillions of dollars. Lazaridis has been moving aggressively to launch and lead a comparable revolution: the era of quantum technology.

In March, with BlackBerry co-founder Doug Fregin, Lazaridis announced the creation of Quantum Valley Investments (QVI), a $100-million venture capital firm that will invest only in businesses that want to exploit quantum technology. There is only one other like it in the world, Quantum Wave, launched last year in Atlanta with Russian money. But QVI builds on more than a decade of expertise Lazaridis has been gathering in Waterloo.

His first move was the creation of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in 1999 to explore fundamental questions in physics, such as the nature of space and gravity, the composition of the atom, and so forth. Perimeter makes nothing but theories. Its standard work tool is chalk on chalkboards. In 2002, Lazaridis launched his project’s experimental phase, the Institute for Quantum Computing (IQC). Spilling across three buildings including the year-old, state-of-the-art 280,000-sq.-foot Quantum Nano Centre, IQC is home to 200 scientists trying to turn theory into working prototypes for a new technology.

And that’s where Lazaridis originally planned to leave things, because he didn’t think there would be workable quantum technology in his lifetime. “I was going to leave it to other people to do.”

Quantum technology depends on the peculiar properties of matter at the smallest scale, the scale of atoms. Classical information technology, the stuff we use every day, is built from tiny switches, or “bits,” that can either be on or off. But at the atomic scale, things get so weird it is a challenge even to describe them. An individual atom in its new role as a quantum bit can be on, off—or both at the same time. Quantum particles can become “entangled” so that a change in one particle is reflected by an identical change in the other—instantly, across any distance. These properties are so close to magic that it’s perhaps appropriate that they only happen out of sight: as soon as humans attempt to measure what’s going on in a quantum system, it loses its “quantum-ness.”

But the potential payoff from this strangeness is vast. The “superposition” of quantum bits—their ability to be on, off and both at the same time—means that quantum computing power increases geometrically. Two quantum bits, or “qubits,” can hold as much information as four classical bits, three as much as eight—and 500 could hold and process far more information than the largest computer yet built.

The trick is to make them. The state of the art is rudimentary. When Lazaridis hired a soft-spoken, Quebec-born student of Stephen Hawking’s named Raymond Laflamme to be the director of the Institute for Quantum Computing in 2002, Laflamme had built a five-qubit “computer,” an incredibly finicky tinker toy. Laflamme is up to a dozen qubits now; he hopes to have machines with 50 to 100 qubits in the next five years. To get this far, Lazaridis has paid $200 million of his own money, an amount roughly matched by a series of investments over 13 years by the Ontario and federal governments.

But four or five years ago, Laflamme started to report to Lazaridis that progress toward quantum computers is faster than expected, and the road is not empty of landmarks. It will take an unimaginable string of breakthroughs to get to workable quantum computers—but because the field is so new, every single breakthrough along the way has an immediate practical application. Each discovery Laflamme and his colleagues makes has provided something that could go on the market for profit.

Laflamme showed me sheets of factory-made diamond with precisely inserted impurities, individual atoms poked into the carbon lattice with microscopic accuracy. The resulting material has quantum properties. He showed me a sensor made of silicon and etched aluminum. An IQC researcher, Adrian Lupascu, had an insight: If quantum states are incredibly delicate and prone to break down, their very fragility can make them useful for sensors. “These are the best magnetometers there are, the size of microns . . . an order of magnitude more sensitive than anything else.” They’ll have applications in medical imaging, manufacturing and microscopy.

Laflamme has been recruiting world-class scientists at an accelerating pace: materials scientists, engineers, theorists. His biggest catch by far is David Cory, a nuclear engineer the University of Waterloo poached from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2010 with a $10-million federal grant. Nobody in the world is better at understanding the odd language of quantum particles or in spotting their real-world applications. He came to Canada with three 18-wheelers full of lab equipment. That posed the sort of challenge Lazaridis likes to solve.

When the federal grant competition was announced, Laflamme said, “David was obviously a target. This building was not ready. The question was, how do you bring him here, but leave him with no room for a year or two?”

Lazaridis was at the table when Laflamme explained his dilemma: For the next two years he would have only temporary digs, and he needed Cory right now. “So Mike looked up and said, ‘Would another building like this work?’ I said yeah. He said, ‘I’ll get back to you.’ That was around 10 a.m. At around noon he said, ‘We have a deal. I talked to the president of the university, I have a partner.’ ” The IQC expanded to fill the building next door, and when the new building opened in 2012, the two other buildings stayed in service.

Cory, wild-haired and bearded like an aging California surfer, showed me room after room of laboratories, moving at a speed just short of a run. “Here we have NMR systems, so they’re big superconducting magnets,” he said at one point. “A 10 millikelvin vacuum can,” able to produce temperatures a fraction of a degree above absolute zero. “X-ray diffraction.”

Pieces of equipment the size of household refrigerators were connected in long chains, in a hodgepodge as cheerfully improvised as a high-school chemistry lab but with equipment thousands of times more delicate and powerful. “Every room should be a lab, in my view,” Cory said, peering into a cubicle the size of a graduate student’s office. “Here we grow diamonds,” he said in another room across the hall. “We can grow about a micron of diamond an hour.”

Cory has an unusually large team of graduate students and post-doctoral assistants from a wide variety of disciplines. The entire team meets every morning. Nobody is allowed to work on individual projects. They have found applications for their work in medical imaging and in deep-sea oil exploration. “We’ve started exploring with the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre” in Toronto, Cory said. “Just an open-ended discussion. How can quantum sensors make a difference? And there’ll be many ways. It’ll build on old work we did at the Dana-Farber cancer centre in Boston, using quantum sensors to set the edges of soft-tissue sarcomas.”

In September, IQC named its two latest recruits. Amir Yacoby comes from Harvard University and is a world leader in developing these exotic materials that can hang onto quantum characteristics. Steve MacLean is an astronaut: he served on the International Space Station in 2006 and was the president of the Canadian Space Agency from 2008-13. But MacLean is also a physicist who was setting up an elaborate experiment in his garage—he won’t discuss details—when he bumped into Lazaridis a few years ago at Cape Canaveral before a space shuttle launch. “We ended up talking for two hours about everything and nothing.” Soon MacLean had offices at Perimeter and at IQC. He also serves on the advisory board of the new venture-capital firm.

What are they doing? MacLean won’t say. “Um. I mean, I know the answer to that,” he said, when I asked him how many business plans QVI is adjudicating. “There are many non-disclosure agreements.”

All the research at Perimeter and IQC is public, as at any university. Just about everything to do with QVI is private. This is what happens when science moves into the fiercely competitive world of business.

“You know what I’m doing by doing that?” MacLean said in an attempt to explain his silence. “I’m protecting Canada in a way. I mean, this is a community effort that we’re doing here and we have certain leads in certain areas and I just would like you to focus on the fact that it’s unique.”

Only Lazaridis can talk about what goes on at QVI. He doesn’t say much either. But he reveals that the fund has made its first investment. “Actually, we only went public after we did our first investment.”

What’s the investment?

“I can’t tell you that.”

What’s the scale of the investment?

“It’s big.”

What field is it in? Is it in sensors? Cryptography?

“Those were already announced before we made our investment. Our investment is different.”

Will it lead to products on the market? Yes, Lazaridis said, perhaps in two or three years. Products for consumers? “I can’t really tell you.”

He finally said that the entrepreneur QVI just funded is “a guy from around here” and that when he wrote an equation on a blackboard, “I said, ‘We have to invest in this.’ This is not just an improvement, this is not just a new way of doing a classical thing that we’re all used to. This is something new.”

He is being coy. But he is not just being coy. Quantum technology is not just a new method of making computers, it is a vast new field of technologies that have never existed before. If Quantum Valley is the new Silicon Valley, this year may be the equivalent of 1957, and decades more work may lie ahead. When the founders of Fairchild Semiconductor were asked back then to explain what a transistor is for, one of them said it might make a better hearing aid. There was no way to imagine iPhones and GPS navigation and the trillion-dollar economy that followed.

A half-dozen countries are financing major quantum technology efforts, including China, the U.S. and the United Kingdom. It is easy for venture-capital firms to bet big on companies that flop. QVI may be just the latest in Mike Lazaridis’s 14-year-old, very expensive fascination with weird science. Or it may launch a new century of innovation. Of all the people in this Power List, Lazaridis’s potential clout will be felt, if at all, over the longest time span, with the highest risk of failure. But if it pans out, he and his associates will change the world.

“This is a new technology. How do you predict where you’re going to wind up? There is no classical counterpart. You can’t just go back and say, ‘This is a better version of that.’ And that’s the part that gets me excited.” PW

11: Gerald Butts
Scruffy beard behind the perfect hair

Trudeau’s top adviser is as close as can be imagined to the potential next prime minister. He has guided every step of the Liberal leader’s rise so far, and is positioned to remain, to borrow an old phrase, close to the charisma for years to come. They have been close since meeting as McGill University students. Butts went on to be principal secretary to then-Ontario premier Dalton McGuinty before becoming president and CEO of World Wildlife Canada. From his Ontario government years, Butts brings front-line, hard-earned political experience that Trudeau lacks. As well, Butts is the son of a Cape Breton coal miner, possibly a useful corrective to the experience and instincts of the son of an iconic Liberal prime minister. JG

12: Beverley McLachlin
Power trimmed with ermine

At 70, she’s already the longest-serving chief justice of the Supreme Court of Canada (having passed the previous record-holder, Sir William Ritchie—1879 to 1892). Handling the Senate reference this fall will remind us that McLachlan is a central figure, as she has been since taking over the helm of the top court in 2000. And there will be many more big decisions to come from the McLachlin Court if she makes good on her recent comments about her intention to remain the country’s top judge until her mandatory retirement at 75. JG

13: Thomas Mulcair
Leader of the prosecution

Mulcair’s power is undeniably diminished by Trudeau’s ascent. Before Trudeau, Mulcair was the guy on the Opposition benches everybody was watching. Now, he has to compete with Trudeau for attention—and more often than not, so far, has come up short. However, Mulcair still heads the official Opposition,which means he gets to lead question period anyway. That matters. Mulcair proved it last spring with a prosecutorial assault on Harper over the Senate, and showed the same tough form often this fall. He might not have Trudeau’s celebrity, but political opportunism allows him to score when the news of the day calls for his particular combative skill set. JG

14: James Moore
From identity to pocketbook politics

In the late summer of 2000, a recent political science graduate at the University of Northern British Columbia sat on the floor of his basement apartment in Prince George, B.C. A fall federal election was in the wind, and he used a Sharpie to draw the outlines of his home riding, a suburban Vancouver constituency held by a Liberal MP, on a Frommer’s map. Also arrayed around him were his old high school and junior high yearbooks. If he could identify just 250 friends and acquaintances back home who would support him, he figured that might be enough to get himself nominated as the Canadian Alliance candidate, and then try to capture the seat.

Unlike many dream-job schemes, it worked. At just 24, James Moore won Port Moody-Coquitlam-Port Coquitlam under Stockwell Day’s Alliance leadership, making him B.C.’s youngest MP ever. He has held the riding easily through four elections since then. During that stretch, he saw Day falter and fade, and the Alliance merge with the old Tories to form a new Conservative party under Stephen Harper. Along the way, Moore evolved from an unusually young and vocal opposition backbencher, to one of Harper’s designated question period scrappers, to one of his most prominent cabinet ministers and regional chieftains. He’s still only 37. Promoted to the Industry Canada portfolio in last summer’s cabinet shuffle, after a fairly high-profile stint as heritage minister, Moore’s rise from student striver to key economic minister happened fast.

Yet he is not entirely content. He worries that the public sees politicians only when they’re behaving badly, especially in question period—and even then some of the worst stuff isn’t captured on camera. And he doesn’t exclude himself from criticism. “Look, I’ve had my moments that I’m not proud of,” he says of the 45 minutes of daily sparring in the House. “The public sees people losing their cool on camera. What they don’t hear are some of the pretty boorish, aggressive and personal heckles, and people being teased for their weight”—he’s a big man—“their hair, their gender, their tie. It can be really awful at times.”

Moore adds that he’s frustrated to turn on the TV news at the end of day when he might have attended two cabinet committees, met with a top CEO, and grappled with a departmental policy file—only to hear that the Senate controversy alone rates a story. Still, he didn’t arrive exactly unprepared for the bruising side of politics. In fact, Moore’s apprenticeship was in perhaps the only forum less decorous than QP—talk radio. As well, he’s conscious of how politics in his home province, more than most places, traditionally lines up along bitter, ideological divides.

He grew up in Coquitlam, just outside Vancouver, son of a dentist father and a teacher-turned-homemaker mother. A serene suburban upbringing was broken by his mother’s sudden death from cancer in 1993, when he was 17. It changed his priorities. “After my mom died,” he says, “I decided to do more than save money for a Jeep.” Politics seemed a way to make life matter. He volunteered for Preston Manning’s Reform insurgency in that year’s federal election. Tilting right wasn’t an act of rebellion; his dad had raised money and put up signs for B.C.’s Social Credit party. But Moore also says Let the Trumpet Sound, Stephen B. Oates’s then newly published biography of Martin Luther King, Jr., had impressed him deeply, and he drew a line from civil rights idealism to Manning’s arguments for individual and provincial equality before the law.

The 1993 election was a watershed. Jean Chrétien’s Liberals won, but Manning’s Reformers and Lucien Bouchard’s separatist Bloc Québécois burst into prominence as the Tories were nearly wiped out. Working on the campaign, Moore met a right-wing Vancouver talk radio host, and ended up guesting on her show. Soon he was a fixture on the city’s airwaves. After the 1997 election, he moved to Ottawa to work briefly as a communications assistant to Manning, whose influence remains powerful. Moore describes Manning as providing, even now, a rare “generational perspective” on policy and politics, and he contrasts the elder statesman’s long view with the reality of governing, where “everything is a three-year cycle, a two-year pilot project, a five-year economic plan.”

Getting a taste of Ottawa with Manning, Moore realized his lack of higher education mattered. He went home to enrol in the University of Northern B.C. One of his professors, John Young, remembers his new student coming up after his first American politics class to mention that he was running his own website on B.C. politics. “I checked out the website and thought, ‘Okay, this young man is already a good notch above many,’ ” Young recalls. Moore not only dominated in-class debates (“Other students were a bit reluctant to go up against him,” Young says), he also hosted a show on a Prince George radio station.

In 2000, Moore vaulted pretty much from a seat in a classroom to one in the House of Commons, and yet says a long career in federal politics didn’t seem likely to him then. Day had fared well in B.C., but his failure to break through in Ontario, where Chrétien’s Liberals continued their dominance, left him vulnerable. Revolt broke out in the Alliance caucus. As well, Chrétien was likely to be succeeded by Paul Martin, whose “Blue Liberal” credentials, Moore says, were expected to play well in the West. So the B.C. rookie saw himself as a likely “one-term wonder.”

He says two unrelated developments changed that. The first was the terrorist attack on New York and Washington on Sept. 11, 2001. The Alliance’s internal squabbling faded quickly to irrelevance that day. Moore and other opposition MPs threw themselves into parliamentary work, as the Liberals forged new security and anti-terrorism policies. “We said, whether our political party will survive, all that is secondary,” Moore says. The following year, Day called a leadership race in a bid to solidify his hold on the Alliance, but was instead beaten by Harper, who came back to politics after a hiatus as head of the National Citizens Coalition. His return, and his success in reuniting the Canadian right, is the second factor that Moore credits with prolonging his federal political life.

When Harper won the 2006 election, he didn’t elevate Moore to cabinet right away. But as a parliamentary secretary, Moore was handed plum responsibilities for the upcoming Vancouver 2010 Olympics. In the 2008 campaign, Harper’s remark that cutting arts funding “isn’t something that resonates with ordinary people” hurt him. In Quebec, those cuts were an unexpectedly big issue. After the election, Moore was named heritage minister and assigned to repair the damage. A product of immersion education through elementary and high school, he speaks French well. Money also talks, though, and he points to Canada Council funding increases and the creation of the Canada Media Fund, which supports production of TV and digital programs, as having helped the Tories with the skeptical arts and entertainment sectors.

Perhaps his most delicate Heritage file was the CBC. In last year’s federal budget, the Harper government cut the public broadcaster’s funding 10 per cent, from $1.1 billion, over three years. Moore suggests the CBC must now secure its own future. “It’s for them to find their relevance, present it to Canadians, and if Canadians support it, they’ll continue funding it. If not, it will disappear,” he says, Moore also left his mark on national identity issues, pushing history projects like the 200th anniversary of the War of 1812 and launching plans for Canada’s 150th birthday in 2017.

Moving to Industry last summer gave him a chance to prove himself in an economic post. Jason Kenney made a similar transition, to Employment from Citizenship and Immigration. Tory insiders see both as likely future leadership aspirants. Moore is striking a pro-consumer stance, talking about how cable companies should give viewers better options to “pick and pay” for only the channels they want and promoting more competition among cellphone companies. Still, exactly how he hopes to accomplish either goal remains largely a mystery. On more cell choice, Verizon’s decision not to enter the Canadian market was a serious setback. Opposition MPs see Moore creating high expectations without obvious policy solutions in hand. “He’s one of the better ministers,” says NDP consumer protection critic Glenn Thibeault. “However, he’s got no plan in place.”

Perhaps even more than his demanding policy file, though, Moore is identified with his province. He says B.C. has only lately moved from its traditional position on the periphery of national affairs to the centre. Fierce debate about pipelines to the Pacific has made talk of B.C.’s proximity to Asian markets feel far more important. Environmental issues carry huge national consequences. Aboriginal policy is being cast in a new light by developments like B.C.’s Nisga’a Nation’s moving recently to let its members privately own tribal land, a first for a Canadian Native community. With all this in play, the old B.C. politics of polarized, left-right extremes feels to Moore outmoded. “There’s a maturation because now we matter,” he says. “It’s time for B.C. to step up and step forward.” And an auspicious moment to emerge as province’s leading figure on the federal stage. JG

15: Christy Clark
Pollsters stumble, premier thrives

Her astounding comeback in the last British Columbia provincial election left professional pollsters sheepish and the B.C. premier in a position of power. But energy development as a path to economic successes poses big challenges. Clark is banking on up to 10 liquefied natural gas projects to create thousands of jobs. This month she secured a framework agreement with Alberta that would provide unspecified economic benefits to B.C. if a proposed pipeline to bring Alberta oil-sands crude to a Pacific port ultimately goes ahead. JG

16: Pierre Karl Peladeau
Famous initials, far-flung influence

Even though he stepped down as CEO of Quebecor in May, Peladeau is still its largest shareholder and chairman of its media and television branches. PKP, as he’s known, controls everything from TV news and talent shows, to Montreal’s leading tabloid newspaper and supermarket checkout-line magazines, to the Canada-wide Sun News TV and print brand. Last April, Quebec Premier Pauline Marois made him chairman of Hydro-Québec, the province’s electricity transmitter. He’s after an NHL franchise for Quebec City. And he’s a tireless promoter of entrepreneurship in Quebec. JG

17: Laureen Harper
She lives at 24 too

Stephen Harper’s parents put him in the Royal Conservatory of Music program and, growing up, he regularly played classical pieces. After he married and moved in with Laureen Harper, the piano followed them from house to house. Laureen knew he was a big Beatles fan, so she started to leave the band’s sheet music on the piano. It was her subtle way of nudging him to bring out another side of his personality.

So it’s not surprising she was behind Harper’s performance at the Conservative convention in Calgary last month when he took the stage at Cowboys Dance Hall to play with the Ottawa band Herringbone, belting out Stompin’ Tom Connors’s The Hockey Song, followed by some Johnny Cash and BTO. “She would have orchestrated something like that,” says Laura Peck, vice-president of McLoughlin Media and a friend to Laureen. The performance, coming amid a convention dominated by the Senate scandal, made all of the major news networks and national and local papers, despite being a delegates-only event. For good measure she tweeted the video link to her 6,000 followers.

It was signature Laureen Harper, employing a tried-and-true tactic to soften her husband’s image. In 2009 she was the architect behind the Prime Minister’s surprise appearance at the National Arts Centre where he got on stage with Yo-Yo Ma and sang the Beatles’ With a Little Help from My Friends. Harper got a standing ovation, and the event drew national coverage for the NAC event, of which Laureen was the honorary gala chair. Even the Toronto Star ran the headline, “Stephen Harper rocks out.”

She does these things because they are fun but, at the same time, she is not oblivious to the benefits. Laureen Harper’s brand of power, while highly effective, is not always obvious. It comes in part from who she is—personable and passionate, skilled in subtle, quiet persuasion. She is able to draw people to step out of their comfort zone, and not just her husband.

These abilities dovetail with her charity work. She fosters cats for the Humane Society and has placed many felines in the homes of senior politicians, lobbyists, journalists and friends. She attracts large donations to her favourite charities and is sought after by organizations to help raise their fundraising profiles. Over time Laureen has expanded beyond her earliest cause, animals, to helping a long list of other groups, including the anti-bullying movement and several arts organizations. “She takes on things she can be most effective at and runs the distance,” says Peck.

When the Harpers first arrived in the nation’s capital from Calgary, they did not fit into the Ottawa crowd. “They didn’t care because they just wanted to be themselves,” says someone who has spent time around the couple. Laureen helped them integrate.

Those who know her well say she should not be underestimated. She is strategic about politics too—she speaks off the record to certain Ottawa journalists, reads the media coverage closely and is social-media savvy. She does not speak publicly about policy but has very strong views. And while she looks after the philanthropic and entertainment side of life at 24 Sussex, hosting musicians like Jann Arden and Nickelback, she is also skilled at forming alliances, something her husband shies away from.

She has “great influence with and over different cabinet ministers,” says one source who is politically connected. Laureen is close to two cabinet ministers in particular—John Baird and Rona Ambrose—and they are genuine friends. But she also knows her strengths and her husband’s weaknesses, says the source. “She is more social than the Prime Minister and this helps strengthen the bonds and fidelity these ministers have with the PM. She is able to do some of the relationship nurturing that he is not known for. That is very valuable.”

It is why Conservatives call her Harper’s secret weapon. JULIE SMYTH

18: Jason Kenney
Building a PM’s resumé

As Harper’s Citizenship and Immigration minister, he redefined citizenship in Conservative-friendly ways and sought new Conservative votes among immigrants. In the summer shuffle, Kenney became minister of employment and kept his responsibility for ethnic outreach. The new role gives him experience in an economic portfolio he may need if he ever runs to replace Harper as Conservative leader. And since his job has always been to advance Conservative electoral chances, there’s no reason to believe that’s changed with his new role. JG

19: Alex Pourbaix
It’s not just about Keystone

The protests and political turmoil that have delayed Washington’s approval of TransCanada Corp.’s proposed Keystone XL pipeline served as a tough lesson for the Calgary company’s president of energy and oil pipelines. And Keystone isn’t dead yet— President Barack Obama is now expected to make a decision by late winter or early spring. But TransCanada exec Pourbaix might have a better bet with his proposed $12-billion Energy East TransCanada pipeline, which Prime Minister Stephen Harper says he approves “in principle,” though the project must still get regulatory approval. If it does get the go-ahead, the new outlet for Alberta oil would see 3,000 km of existing natural gas pipeline converted to carry crude oil, as well as the construction of another 1,400 km of fresh pipe. The pipeline would terminate at a new marine terminal at Saint John, N.B. The project has its critics, but it will be a debate fought here in Canada. JG

20: Jenni Byrne
Tough job, tougher politico

Shortly after Ray Novak took over as chief of staff, Jenni Byrne was tabbed as a deputy chief of staff—returning to the PMO from the Conservative party, where she was director of political operations. Byrne has a reputation as a tough partisan, but she also has history with the party (she joined the Reform party at 16) and a record of success (she directed the Conservative campaign in 2011). She might be the Prime Minister’s best political organizer, but she now has her work cut out for her. Byrne remains in her volunteer position as the Conservative party national campaign chair—a sign campaign preparations will be a priority for Harper. If the Tories are to revive themselves this year and be re-elected in 2015, she’ll have to succeed at both her PMO and party tasks. AW

21: Marc Caira
Doubling down on Tim’s

Taking over as Tim Hortons CEO this summer makes Caira not just a business figure but a cultural curator. The iconic purveyor of caffeine, sugar and carbs must fend off McDonald’s and Starbucks to maintain its Canadian market lead, while trying to boost its U.S. presence. Caira says he wants to bring speedier service and new food options—some of them healthier—while retaining that Tim’s Canadiana feel. JG

22: Steve Yzerman
There’s gold, and then there’s gold

The legendary former captain of the Detroit Red Wings was appointed as the executive director of the Canadian men’s Olympic hockey team in 2008. Two years later, the team won a hard-fought gold in Vancouver. Everybody likes to remember that one, and the 2002 gold in Salt Lake City. But the 2006 seventh place finish in Turin, Italy, and the 1998 fourth place in Nagano, Japan, were outright disasters for the team and national pride. More than anyone—other than, perhaps, team leader and NHL superstar Sidney Crosby—it is Yzerman who carries the burden of making sure the team succeeds in Sochi, Russia. JG

23: Heather Conway
New blood at the Mother Corp

Just chosen as the new executive vice-president of English-language services of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Conway will oversee a cultural empire—TV, radio and online services in the public broadcaster’s English services. Her path to the CBC’s most-watched job was unconventional; she was most recently chief business officer at the Art Gallery of Ontario, before that the head of Canadian operations for the international public relations firm Edelman’s. But she has broadcasting experience, from her six years as executive vice-president of marketing at Alliance Atlantis. Prior to that she was executive vice-president of corporate and public affairs for TD Bank Financial Group. All in, it’s a Toronto establishment resumé that marks her as a top executive, but still something of a wild card inside CBC’s often insular corporate culture. JG

24: Anne Merklinger
Owning triumph—or disappointment

As head of Own the Podium, the former swimmer and curler is the executive responsible for making sure Canadians feel good about how athletes wearing the Maple Leaf perform at the world’s biggest sports showcases. Currently, Merklinger’s federal strategic fund is investing $33.8 million in summer Olympic sports for 2013-14 and $23.8 million for winter sports. At the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver, Canada won 26 medals, including 14 golds, placing third overall in the medal count. That’s the target for the upcoming 2014 winter games in Sochi. Merklinger was among Canada’s best curlers in the ’90s. She went on to become a respected manager with national sports organizations like CanoeKayak Canada. Which is nice. But this is the Olympics. It’s the athletes we’ll be watching come February, but it’s Merklinger whose program will be put to the test. JG

25: Andrew McCartney
Your food. His campaign.

As managing director at Tribal DDB Toronto, McCartney is one of the marketing minds behind the McDonald’s advertising campaign “Our Food. Your Questions.” The widely discussed campaign was built around a McDonald’s webpage where consumers ask thousands of questions on everything from whether the shakes are fake to how McNuggets are processed. McDonald’s answers. The digital campaign tried, and largely succeeded, to convey frank transparency through a production style far less glossy and jingly than a typical McDonald’s spot. Print and TV ads carried the same just-the-facts tone. Tribal won silver in the social media marketing category at prestigious Cannes Lions awards for advertising and related commercial promotions work. McCartney’s next moves are being closely watched. JG

26: Suzanne Fortier
Brainpower and big money

The new president of McGill University comes to the prestigious post from a stint as head of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. There, Fortier pushed the federal granting agency to focus on supporting research with direct commercial potential, and on using the federal fund to foster relationships between universities and companies. She’s been a vocal proponent of attracting women to science and engineering. Her return to McGill—she studied there after growing up in a village on the south shore of the St. Lawrence—comes at a tense time for higher education in Quebec. She’s expected to lead on many levels—campus, province and country. JG

27: Jim Flaherty
Not unscathed, but still standing

Having survived the Great Recession, the only finance minister Stephen Harper has ever had is also his cabinet’s most durable figure. Early this year he revealed that he’s battling a rare skin disease that has, at times, left him looking bloated and blotchy. Still he perseveres. His declared aim is to remain the government’s senior economic minister until the federal budget, which he plunged into deficit in 2009, is again balanced. He says red ink will dry up by 2015. That’s also, as it happens, the year of the next scheduled election. Will Flaherty run again? He’s been the MP for the Ontario riding of Whitby-Oshawa since 2006. He’s also the minister responsible for the Greater Toronto Area, which is shaping up as the key battleground for the next campaign. JG

28: Pierre Poilievre
Role model for ultra-partisans

His ascension to cabinet might have turned the stomachs of his critics, but if politics is war, Poilievre had proven himself on the battlefield of question period as a capable and eager combatant. And so, who better to handle the fraught and perilous file of democratic reform? Harper’s Senate reform agenda is now in the hands of the Supreme Court, and a verdict that is unfavourable to the government will only complicate matters. Meanwhile, promised reforms to Canada’s election laws are long overdue. Someone well-practised in fending off criticism and doubt is perhaps exactly what the Prime Minister needed here. AW

29: Preston Manning
Elder statesman, assiduous networker

In U.S. Republican circles, insiders have long differentiated between the “party,” which seeks to win elections, and the “movement,” which promotes an ideology. When it has come to Canadian conservatism, drawing that line has always been somewhat tricky. But the founder and former leader of the Reform party has made it easier through his Calgary-based Manning Centre for Building Democracy. The centre’s annual networking conference in Ottawa has become a rallying point for true believers—and the Conservative politicians who seek their support. Manning’s own speeches and op-eds about democratic reform and free markets make him a sort of activist elder statesman. He’s held in awe by next-generation power figures like Industry Minister James Moore. JG

30: Jean-François Lisée
The strategy beneath the controversy

Back in the dark days of the 1995 referendum Lisée was a speechwriter for Jacques Parizeau, but was quick to distance himself from the then-PQ premier’s “money and the ethnic vote” rant on the evening of defeat. But time has brought Lisée around to at least part of what Parizeau was getting at. Premier Pauline Marois’s bid to stop public servants from wearing obvious religious symbols flows from ideas Lisée hatched about the necessity of the PQ positioning itself as the ultimate defender of Québécois identity. And beyond the polarizing charter, Lisée’s view might just be the most powerful defining set of ideas in the latest variation on separatist doctrine. JG

31: Alison Redford
Last of the Red Tories

The Alberta premier made peace (sort of) with B.C.’s Christy Clark; they jointly appointed officials to try to settle their pipeline differences at July’s Council of the Federation meeting. Then in November the two premiers reached a framework agreement moving them a small step closer to a deal on the Northern Gateway pipeline from the oil sands to B.C.’s coast. Redford has taken her pro-Keystone position to Washington several times, making the case for the pipeline to think tanks, State Department officials and politicians. JG

32: Stephen Poloz
You knew the last guy

The Bank of Canada’s new governor takes over from the biggest star the central bank has ever created, or is ever likely to—Mark Carney, who hopped the Atlantic to take over the Bank of England. But if Poloz can’t hope to match Carney’s star power, economic events might well conspire to force him to take more controversial action. Carney ushered in a prolonged period of holding pat with rock-bottom interest rates, but private sector economists expect that to end sometime next year. If those predictions prove true, Poloz might have the thankless task of reminding Canadian consumers and businesses that rates must sometime rise. Carney’s power rested largely on his charisma. Poloz’s could end up being a function of tough action. JG

33: Michael Ferguson
Brainpower and big money

The proposed purchase of the F-35 fighter jet was already a heavily contested file for the government—its price tag the subject of doubt for the opposition and strident rhetoric from the Conservative side—but it didn’t become a fully realized problem until the new auditor general rendered his verdict. Ferguson’s report in April 2012 compelled the Conservatives to completely reposition themselves on the issue of replacing Canada’s aging fleet of CF-18s, and re-evaluate their options. Now Ferguson has turned his attention to the government’s shipbuilding procurement, and sometime after that will come the results of an audit of Senate expenses. He might still be living in the shadow of his predecessor, Sheila Fraser, but Ferguson has already left one mark on Parliament Hill and he might be about to leave a few more. And not only must the government be conscious of what his Senate review might find, so, too, must the entire upper chamber, at a time when the Senate’s existence is already hanging in the balance. AW

34: Jean-Pierre Blais
Consumer agenda, insider connections

Appointed chairman of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission last year, Blais is a veteran federal bureaucrat. As such, business wasn’t sure what to make of him. But his actions have started to create a picture of a perhaps surprisingly consumer-friendly regulator. Although the Harper government’s fervent desire for more cellphone competition took a hit when Verizon announced it’s not much interested in buying into the Canadian market, Blais has instituted his own, less flashy pro-competition policies. Notably, his CRTC is imposing a new code of conduct to make it easier for easier consumers to switch cell service providers without paying stiff penalties for breaking contracts. As a recent veteran of top jobs at the federal Treasury Board and in Canadian Heritage, Blais is reputed to have a solid relationship with the Tories. JG

35: Joe Oliver
In oil-town Ottawa, he matters

The fact that the Prime Minister left Oliver in his job as natural resources minister in last July’s cabinet shuffle gave the former investment banker and stock market executive a chance to put finally some wins in the window. So far, Oliver’s tenure has offered only frustration for the Prime Minister on the pipelines that are needed to secure better market access for Alberta oil—Keystone XL through the U.S. and the Northern Gateway pipeline across B.C. The top priority is Keystone—the White House is expected to make a decision before March 31, 2014—and Oliver was in Washington in September (his fifth visit to the U.S. capital) to push Harper’s new strategy of forging closer energy co-operation between Canada and the U.S. It is unarguably the top federal economic file of the moment, making Oliver an undeniably powerful figure—and perhaps also a vulnerable one, in the case of failure. JG

36: Tom Jenkins
Leveraging federal spending

As the executive chairman and chief strategy officer of Open Text, Canada’s biggest software company, Jenkins would belong on this list for his business stature alone. But he is likely also the most influential business leader in Harper’s Ottawa. He chaired the government’s research and development policy review panel, whose 2011 report directly influenced key measures introduced in subsequent budgets—like the 2012 move to target more federal support to innovative companies and the 2013 shift toward leveraging major armed forces procurement more aggressively as an economic development tool. JG

37: Tom Lawson
Piloting the military in rough weather

As a veteran fighter jet pilot, and a former deputy commander at NORAD, Lawson was carrying some interesting baggage when he was appointed chief of the defence staff last fall. After all, the biggest problem confronting the Forces is the politically botched plan to buy F-35 jets to replace the CF-18s Lawson once flew. He had been a big fan of the troubled Joint Strike Fighter, as the “next generation” Lockheed Martin jet is also known, but in the face of criticism over its price tag he quickly admitted that other jets might do the job, too. Unlike his two predecessors, Lawson doesn’t have troops in combat in Afghanistan. That frees him up to make what are perhaps overdue changes to the structure and efficiency of the Canadian military in the face of cutbacks. JG

38: Marc Ouellet
Not the pope, but still

The cardinal from northwestern Quebec came close to becoming pope in March, before he reportedly asked his backers to switch their support to the eventual winner of the papal election, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, now Pope Francis. That has led to speculation that Ouellet, already a power in the Church as prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, is in line for promotion at the Vatican under the new Pope. At 69, Ouellet is not seen as headed toward retirement anytime soon, and Vatican insiders say the Canadian enjoys a close relationship with Francis, perhaps partly because Ouellet spent many years in Latin America as a theology professor, and so shares interests with the pontiff from Argentina. JG

39: Shawn Atleo
He leaves them no alternative

The cautious, consultative style of the national chief of the Assembly of First Nations once made him seem easy to ignore. Federal politicians sought to work around his AFN, rather than engage the organization directly. But the rise last year of the Idle No More movement showed Ottawa an unsettling picture of inchoate Aboriginal protest. Suddenly Atleo’s mainstream alternative looked indispensable. Still, he has yet to prove he can leverage his position for results. And Atleo faces threats to his power from, among others, Grand Chief Derek Nepinak, from the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs. Atleo needs to present real evidence his cautious, centrist approach can score wins for First Nations on files like education. JG

40: Garry Keller
A survivor looks outward

Last year, when he was just 35, John Baird’s chief of staff received a life-saving kidney transplant. Since recovering from the surgery, Keller has solidified his position as one of the most powerful and respected political staffers on the Hill. Baird’s survival as foreign minister—which has proven a tough position to keep for long in Harper’s government—is largely attributed to Keller’s strategic management and tactical advice. JG

41: Jennifer Keesmaat
Looking past Toronto’s mayor

She created plans for smaller Canadian cities, like Moncton, Regina, Peterborough, Ont., and Saskatoon, before leaping to the very big time when she was hired as Toronto’s city planner last year. As an advocate of density and walkability, Keesmaat amounts to a built-in counterbalance to Mayor Rob Ford’s preferences for driving and single-family homes. On Ford pushing a subway extension against expert advice, she tweeted, “Political meddling = bad planning.” She’s even taken on architecture icon Frank Gehry’s development scheme with David Mirvish. JG

42: Jian Ghomeshi
They want to talk with him

When CBC Radio launched his daily talk and variety show Q in 2007, Ghomeshi seemed like a niche, hipster taste. In less than five years, he’s emerged as not just Canada’s arbiter of cultural currency, but also, to a large degree, America’s—at least among the demographic tuned to National Public Radio, whose stations air his show in a remarkable 160 markets daily. Upshot: he’s ubiquitous in Canada and lauded in the pages of the New York Times and Washington Post. Want more? On YouTube, Q’s posts with musicians and actors regularly draw three million hits. And in case you’re asking, “Is he the new Peter Gzowski,” the answer has to be a partial yes: Ghomeshi is arguably the most prominent proponent of the “Canada Reads” literacy campaign, which was also the late, sainted CBC radio interviewer’s favourite cause. JG

43: Drake
His city can thank him later

A Grammy-worthy rapper, multi-platinum recording artist, friend and collaborator to the biggest names in hip hop, and a man whose tweets reach 13 million people, Drake is unquestionably one of this country’s biggest stars (and its first hip-hop superstar). But he’s also proud of this country, not simply as the new “global ambassador” for the Toronto Raptors, but as a hometown boy who name-drops and celebrates his city. With Toronto otherwise known for its crack-smoking mayor, Drake is the city’s best ambassador. AW

44: Carolle Brabant
And the Oscar (nominations) go to…

A two-decade veteran of the federal cultural bureaucracy, Brabant has defied expectations that might go along with that resumé. She has revitalized Telefilm and scored a string of Oscar nominations for movies backed by the federal funding agency. As well, she reworked the system for assessing the success of Canadian movies, taking into account more than box office, and created a new micro-financing model to jump-start careers by backing first features. JG

45: Nancy Southern
In charge (times two) and unafraid

As CEO of two of the country’s biggest 100 companies (Canadian Utilities and ATCO), she’s arguably the most powerful woman in Canadian business. She’s unapologetic about promoting women in her companies, and doesn’t shy from taking other bold stances—like skewering Employment Insurance for propping up unproductive regions. JG

46: Bob Gomes
Find him wherever they’re building stuff

As chief executive officer and president of Stantec Inc. since 2009, Gomes has presided over the company’s expansion as a globe-spanning provider of architectural, engineering and environmental services. They do planning, interior design, landscape architecture, surveying, environmental sciences, and projects of all sorts all over the world. JG

47: Olivia Chow
Beyond a partnership cut short

The widow of Jack Layton, the sainted former NDP leader, is a unique figure on the Canadian left. She nurtures Layton’s memory, whether unveiling a statue to him or co-operating with a laudatory TV biopic. But she also ranks as a top-tier politician in her own right. Speculation that she might seek to become Toronto’s next mayor is rampant. Her appearance was a key moment at the inaugural convention of the new Canadian super-union Unifor. Her voice in the House of Commons, where she sits as a downtown Toronto MP, is one that commands attention. The question now is if Chow settles into her federal role or plunges back into Toronto municipal politics, where she got her start, to write a new, post-Jack chapter in her own story. JG

48: Gerry McCaughey
Worrying about your retirement

As chief executive of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, McCaughey isn’t Canada’s top banker—in fact, CIBC is the smallest of the so-called Big Five. But McCaughey might be the most daring among major Canadian bank CEOs in his view of public policy. Last winter, he used a major speech to call for a bold overhaul of Canada’s system for supporting Canadians in retirement. But rather than focusing on the private savings that are, after all, part of the banking industry’s core retail business, he urged a sweeping reform of the Canada Pension Plan to let anyone who wants to make voluntary contributions far above and beyond what they are already required to through deductions from their paycheques. JG

49: Murray Edwards
Hockey, oil, skiing—that’s calgary power

The Regina-born chair of Canadian Natural Resources isn’t just an oil patch billionaire. Edwards also holds big stakes in ski resorts, aerospace and, not least of all, the National Hockey League as a major investor in the Calgary Flames. Since buying into the Flames in 1994, Edwards has gradually built a reputation as being among the league’s most influential owners; he was considered a major force in the hard-line position they took during the lockout of players last year. He’s legendarily discreet, but reportedly spoke often with Prime Minister Stephen Harper when the Conservative government was revamping foreign-investment rules for Alberta’s oil and gas sector. And he hasn’t forgotten his home province: University of Saskatchewan, his alma mater, renamed its business school in his honour—after he made an $11-million donation. JG

50: Stephen Bronfman
Making a name matter again

It’s been a long time since a member of the storied Bronfman dynasty seemed so immediately relevant to the Canadian scene. But this Bronfman has been hard to ignore lately. Not only is he executive chairman of Claridge Inc., the Montreal private equity firm, he’s also heading Justin Trudeau’s fundraising efforts. This could hardly be more crucial to the future of Canadian federal politics: the Tory advantage over the Liberals in fundraising has underpinned Stephen Harper’s hold on power. Claridge is a key player in Montreal’s downtown revival, spearheading major residential and retail developments. As well, he’s a sought-after philanthropist and backer of causes, among them the David Suzuki Foundation, where he sits on the board of directors. He may not be the richest Bronfman to cut a swath in the Canadian establishment, but his breadth—politics, charity, civic causes, hard-nosed business—makes a famous name freshly relevant. JG

Click here to hear Ottawa bureau chief John Geddes discuss the list.

Photos by: Adrian Wyld/CP; Roth and Ramberg Photography Inc.;  David Cooper/Toronto Star/Getty Images; World Economic Forum; Chantal Poirier/Le Journal de Montreal/QMI Agency; C Squared Studios/Getty Images; Adrian Wyld/CP; Aaron Vincent Elkaim/CP; Chris Wattie/Reuters; Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail/CP; Jaime Hogge; Jake Wright/The Hill Times; George Pimentel; Glenbow Museum; David Kawa; Blair Gable; Blair Gable; Jonathan Hayward/CP; Adrian Wyld/CP; Patrick Doyle/CP; Jake Wright/CP; Adrian Wyld/CP; Blair Gable; Paul Till/Forum Research; Chris Wattie/Reuters; Murray Mitchell/Kamloops Daily News/CP; Christinne Muschi/McGill University; Adrian Wyld/CP; Jake Wright; Todd Korol/Reuters; Adrian Wyld/CP; Sean Kilpatrick/CP; Chris Wattie/Reuters; Todd Korol; Michelle Siu/CP; Dave Chan; Ari Mintz/The New York Times/Redux; Jess Baumung;  Stantec; Sean Kilpatrick/CP; Andrew Vaughan/CP

Filed under:

The 50 most important people in Canada

  1. LOL ‘Names’ out of a hat and in any order.

    • I am as shocked that you were left off the list as you are.

      • Hah….how do you know I was?

        • Pretty sure you’d gloat about that, after trying to get Justin’s phone number.

          • LOL sorry, not interested. Francie would be though.

      • Me too

    • How come I’m not on this list ?

      • Talk to Macleans. LOL

      • I was wondering the same thing…!

  2. I’d argue that Nigel Wright and Mike Duffy may be the most important people in Canada currently, because together, they may end up bringing down number 1 on your list.

    • I completely agree with that statement

    • The list is about the most ‘powerful’ not the most important. I would say that Wright and Duffy are mere pawns initially put in place to do Harper’s bidding and trashed when no longer useful. And why would they no longer be useful? Because, thanks to them, some of Harper’s secret, illegal, and immoral manipulations are seeing the light of day. We can only pray that Harper is deposed as a result of these and other revelations. He is a dishonourable man.

      • Fair point, but the current situation gives them quite a bit of power, should they (Wright in particular) choose to exercise it. Such power may be fleeting, and only limited to a single issue, but it’s still there.

        • I would agree that right now they are very important players in this game of hide n seek… or is it “catch me if you can?” LOL!

    • Not a chance! ; )

  3. And the media campaign on behalf of Justin Trudeau continues unabated. Between Macleans and the CBC, the Liberal Party doesn’t need to hire communications staff.

    • Not to mention Nenshi. The media loves him and if you aren’t paying attention to his greener than grass agenda or his penchant for tax hikes and defaming opponents then he’s your guy.

      • Nobody defames opponents anywhere near the scale of Harper! Except maybe Rob Ford…

  4. Harper is just a puppet, …

    • As opposed to whom??

  5. How does the leader of the third party get in the top ten but not the Leader of Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition?

    • How many of these are “powerful” because the media reports on them? Would Tom Mulcair be on the list if more people learned about what he was saying and doing, in the House and behind the scenes?

    • Just listen to him once and you could answer your own question.

  6. Hey on the timeliness issue, Jason Kenney has to near the top of the list. Started walking away from Harper before the fan got dirty.

    • He hasn’t stepped away from Harper, not even one little bit. As a matter of fact those two work rather well together.

  7. Ok not sure why persons 3, 6, 9 and 10 are on the top 10? Some I have not read much in the news and others I don’t think have influence to change much. I would like to know the reason for their choice. I would put Christy Clark on the top 10 since she won an election when she was expected to loose and has somehow manage to bring back Northern Gateway back from the dead ( which is too bad ). Chris Hatfield for single handed bringing back interest for space exploration to the Canadian public and the world. Mulcair for showing how question period should be done. Also where is Ford? A mayor that has become an embarrassment to Canada’s largest city and has manage to steal the spotlight from everyone not only in Canada but the U.S. as well.

  8. The most important people are NOT wealthy , corrupt politicians – but ordinary Canadians.

    • Bumper sticker blarney.

  9. Nenshi for sure ………thanks to him,
    Calgarians are paying 30% more in taxes since 3 years ago.
    He kept the $52 million that was to be returned to Calgarians from the province,
    and the taxpayers of the city may have to pay for his $6 million defamation law suit.

    Wait?…..oh….. it’s not that list.

    • You might try actually looking up the facts, rather than just parroting the builders who’re pissed that Calgarian taxpayers won’t be covering a third of their development costs for new sprawl anymore and so have launched this bogus defamation suit to try to shut him up.

      This site might help: http://www.calgary.ca/CA/fs/Pages/Property-Tax/Tax-Bill-and-Tax-Rate-Calculation/Historical-Tax-Rates.aspx

      The facts are that three years ago, in 2010, our municipal tax rates were 0.0031380, today they’re 0.0037968. That’s an increase of 20%. Which, true, does seem extreme, until you remember that two years before that, 2008, they were 0.0024151. From there to 2010 is your 30% increase.. and that was done in two years, not three, under Bronconnier, not Nenshi. Nenshi has *reduced* the rate of the increase from the final Bronconnier years when the tax cutting he promised to stay in power back in ’07 started to catch up with the city.

      As for keeping the 52 million, news flash, it is under Nenshi that the city reversed it’s policy of just taking any tax refund from the province without requiring any debate about it whatsoever. Think on that. How many times did the province refund Calgary tax money that we simply never knew about because taking it was automatic? At least Nenshi brought the issue forward and let people talk about it.

      • Here’s the facts….the lawsuit is real,not bogus as you claim
        City council is worried about who will pay the $6 million if he loses and has been behind close doors discussing the lawsuit..without Nenshi..
        All your information about developers and sprawl is interesting but has nothing to do with Cal Wenzel’s lawsuit of personal defamation of character by Nenshi.

        Here are the facts regarding the 30% increase in taxes,In two of the last three years, city council has approved double-digit municipal property tax increases for homeowners — 13 per cent this year and 10.4 per cent last in 2011 — after they took advantage of much lower provincial property tax requests.When you add in Calgary’s 5.1-per-cent civic tax hike in 2012, the compounded tax increase over the mayor’s first term works out to 31.1 per cent.

        Here’s the facts….when Nenshi saw that taxpayers weren’t happy with
        him taking the provincial refunds,yes he did let people talk about it.
        He then asked on a web site what Calgarians wanted done
        with the $52 million dollars (and another $52 million next year)
        The answer the mayor got from the citizens of Calgary was,
        we want it returned back to us as it was intended.
        And after all that,he kept it anyway.And he wants to keep the $52
        million that was going to be returned next year. That would be a total of $104 million he refused to return to the people of Calgary.

        Those my friend are the facts….try looking them up.

        • I’ll try, but I doubt I’ll find them, because they’re not facts at all. There’s a reason I gave you the municipal tax numbers rather than the blended provincial/municipal numbers, after all.

          That reason was specifically so that when you parroted the seriously screwed with numbers from the Sun, as I expected you would, you wouldn’t have a leg to stand on. Congratulations on proving me right. Incidentally, that bit about the compounded tax rate is hilarious.. do you know why? Because if you’re going by that measure, it makes the Bronconnier tax hikes even bigger, yet because builders were seeing a nice cut of those increases, nary a peep was heard. But now that we’ve got a brown mayor.. well now those smaller tax hikes are much much worse somehow.

          As for the website, sure. The answer on the website was that we wanted the money returned. But something happened between then and now. Do you remember what it was? Come on, it wasn’t that long ago, after all.

          I’ll give you a hint.. it was all over the news and nearly canceled the Stampede.

          And no, it wasn’t that Nenshi saw the taxpayers weren’t happy and so let people talk about it. Before Nenshi, the taxpayers never even knew. He could have just sat quiet and let business continue as normal. Although I am curious about the 52 million you say “was going” to be returned next year.. is it not being returned now? I assume you’re also up in arms about that then, yes?

          • Here we go again. What’s the deal you vote for Nenshi and your memory disappears? Nenshi introduced and got voted through policy to keep all monies refunded by other levels of government (which has now been reversed by the new council). Nothing to do with the flood but keep the spin going.

            That website and those Nenshi numbers have been roundly debunked and not by the Sun but by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation so keep the spin going. When this guy hits the big time, as I am sure his gigantic ego will dictate, the media scrutiny will change and your little games and spin won’t fly anymore.

            Maybe it’s time to expose the movement and political party behind the Nenshi push? I’m sure he won’t run for them though when the time comes cause would never get elected.

          • Come you can’t leave us guessing – spill the beans!

        • Okay so you’re a complete idiot if you actually beleive that taxpayers having to pay a subsidy to Developers has nothing to do with Cal Wenzel Nenshi trying to stop these subsidies is precisely why Wenzel is Suing him Wake up and smell the Coffee cuz if Wenzel wins We will continue to have to pay those subsies which equal over $4,000 per Calgarian & for what so guys like Wenzel get to make more of a profit off people some of whom will never own one of his houses

          • The developer won’t pay the $4000 he will just add it on to the price of a home so people who need housing will pay more raising taxes just hurts the poor not the developer

          • So the rest of us should subsidise the home buyer then. The Conservative way used to be you pay for what you get, not so much any more it seems.

            Now we have a bunch of developers who were foiled in their plan to buy council, getting all worried that their gravy train will dry up and they have thrown all their toys out of the pram in a tantrum. All Nenshi did was repeat Wenzel’s words and characterise Wemzel’s threats about what his family was going to do to him as “Godfatherish.”

          • Right on Brother

          • Nonsense the “subsidy” is for roads TO the suburbs not IN the suburbs. Nenshi went after the builders and has tried to shut down new suburbs essentially strangling their business. Of course they would fight back and want people in city hall who support their business.
            Nenshi worked to support ultra left wing Alderman to support his GREEN vision and that’s ok?
            It’s a democracy people have a right to work politically to get others elected who support their position in fact CRA even gives tax rebates for political donations don’t they. It’s perfectly legal!

          • Then why is Wenzel clutching his pearls over the fact that the video came out and Nenshi just repeated what was said in it?

            Did Nenshi pay an extremist think tank to produce Councillors who would do as he wished? Did Nenshi plot to raise money to ensure that he paid those who he agreed with the maximum monies allowed? And then did he suggest offering material benefits above that in the form of signs and trucks?

            As for the rebates, that’s another form of welfare that needs addressing. Why should 75% of donations to Political parties be covered by the tax payer. The party in power at the moment only got ~40% of the vote from a minority part of the population, yet all of us paid to cover 75% of their donations. The per vote subsidy made much more sense than this, but Manning and Flanagan’s creation in the House did away with the wrong form of subsidy because it suited their party, not the taxpayer.

            But that’s what it’s all about – privatising profit, socialising losses and expenditure and business and the right wing are the greediest at the trough.

          • You are terminally misinformed. Nenshi went on radio and TV and went far beyond what was said in the video then used it to gin up his left wing radical green base.

            If you are as close to the situation as you think you are perhaps you can tell what federal political party used their GOTV team to work for Nenshi? Perhaps you can explain why the organization that Nenshi co founded was the one the set up the Mayoral debates with their moderator and their rules?

            When Nenshi hired Stanley,IMO, he effectively declared war on the suburbs and the builders of those suburbs. They have every right in a democracy to organize to elect their slate. Nenshi’s overt backing of ultra left wing Alderman is no different they just didn’t get caught on camera.

            But that’s what the left is all about mischaracterization and pretending to take others money for the “common good” through excess taxation and then blowing it on every goofy idea that rattles through their empty minds until they run out and throw their hands in the air leaving it for others to fix (see Bob Rae)

          • You just repeated what you said above and then let your inner conspiracy theorist run wild.
            Wenzel got his butt handed to him in the election and all that money was spent for nothing, so he sulked. He, like many on the right, failed to take responsibility for his own failings and decided that it was someone else’s fault. So he decided that it must be Nenshi’s fault after waiting months to see if he really was truly offended and if his reputation really was damaged.
            The pathetic part of this is that Nenshi’s statements took what Wenzel said and threw it back at him and his preferred candidates. Nenshi never went far beyond what was said, even the Godfather metaphor was in response to being threatened by “the family.”
            Your last statement is a joke. Just how far in debt are we Federally because a Reform government thinks we don’t have to pay for what we get today? Cutting taxes has done nothing of any real substance except fill corporations off shore accounts. But that’s what we expect from the right. Socialise losses, privatise profits or have you forgotten the Canadian bank bailouts?

          • Yes it would have been nice to get out the ultra left wing Councillors supported by Nenshi. They won by under 50% on split votes. Funny, II don’t hear you complaining about that.

            Apparently though you haven’t done the math there are more right leaning Councillors and on most votes control the outcome.

            As for the rest of your conspiracy theories and general rantings save it for your occupy tent tonight and tell it to some other meathead It’ll make more sense after a toke

          • So I take it that you think the current Federal government is as much of a problem as one Alderman in Calgary, as the entire gang of Cons in the HoC were given power even though they had less than 50% of the votes?
            No? Thought not.

          • 1) He’s the Mayor not an Alderman
            2) The article is about Nenshi try to stay on topic
            3) Time for your Ritalin

          • From your reply
            “Yes it would have been nice to get out the ultra left wing Councillors supported by Nenshi.”

            Not Alderman, sorry, Councillor.

            Same argument reference the Federal government.
            Will you answer or try and hide still?

          • If you took the time to learn the terms you incorrectly toss around you might be worth arguing with. To toss terms around like neo con clearly shows you have NO idea where that term came from, who it applies to or the context to use it in. Certainly no Canadian context. Further, your comments on conservatism sound like you read it in some left wing propaganda pamphlet written by another idiot undoubtedly half as smart as they think they are.

          • You’re kidding right?
            Flanagan and the Calgary school are all neo-Cons, The intellectual elite on the front bench of the current Cons are all neo-Conservatives both when it comes to economic and a fair bit of social policy. This group just happen to mix it with a deal of pragmatism because the Rightwing base in Canada isn’t quite as rabid and accepting of madness as those south of the border.
            Just because you don’t want to be associated with the term because of the negative connotations that the likes of the Bush administration gave the term doesn’t mean you get to wish it away.
            If all you have is some snide witticism about occupy, bongs and lefty this and lefty that, then you don’t have much.

          • Well hairball I was going to let your dumb posts go but this one wins the lamest post of the day and thus deserves a response. The Chicago School of neoconservatives is in no way related to Tom Flanagan and just because some NDP professor or blogger tries to make some tie in order to influence the simple minded,such as yourself, doesn’t make it so.

            Some advice before I go, do some reading other than occupy or NDP pamphlets to educate yourself. There’s a big world out there.

          • How magnanimous of you Obi Wan.

            The fact that you cling to insisting that only Americans from the Chicago school can be neo-Cons show just how bereft of content your argument is. Blair in the UK was/is a neo-Con as being a neo-Con means acting out neo-Conservative policies. (Weirdly the Conservative Cameron is not a neo-Con and neither is his coalition partner.) Neo-Conservative is the only way to describe the Harper government and their attempts to put some very radical policies in place. Look at the removal of the PCs and Red Tories from the party and with it the last vestige of traditional Conservatism if you want to see the transformation from conservative to radical. Also “when I have finished with Canada, it will be unrecognizable” is not a statement that a Conservative would make. That is a statement from a radical rightwinger – a neo-Conservative in the real sense of the term.

            Condescension is best carried out from a solid position and not just one you wish were solid.

          • Tony Blair was a Labor Party Prime Minister you barking lunatic.

            You are living proof that the problem of having a global village in the internet is that the village idiot gets on

            I’m done rant on!

          • A

          • Oh my god, you are one for not keeping up with the times aren’t you.
            Tony Blair was Thatcher’s natural successor. He took Thatcherism to its logical conclusion and destroyed the British Middle Classes (which is different from its North American namesake, before you get all confused again.) Also he actually was the leader of New Labour as opposed to Labour because Labour’s attachment to it’s traditional partners of the Unions and true socialist policies a la Michael Foot made Labour unelectable in England. Scotland and Wales were already on board and N Ireland had their own issues that skewed things but England and the southern English in particular were the king makers. So Blair adopted Thatcherite policies and added a populist veneer to try and capture the young. I was at the genesis of New Labour and witnessed first hand the deliberate distortion of John Smith’s vision for Britain by the pretender Blair.

            For one brief second early on I thought you might have a clue, but your argumentation has gone downhill and your knowledge of the contemporary Western political scene is scarily simplistic and your attachment to traditional labels illustrates that you are clueless. All you have is a conservapedia level of knowledge of politics and a predilection for slurs and teenage catch phrases.

            I am disappointed but not surprised.

          • Ah – the resort to the toke insult – I mean really – is that all you’ve got?

          • Ahh yes, yet another left wing loon joins the debate.
            Tony Blair raised taxes which I’m sure you’d just love and increased the public service sector yet because he joined the attack on Iraq the EXTREME left labels him a neo con?

            You people are idiots and that’s being kind!

          • As they say – just give some people a little rope. Good luck with your tract house building in Calgary. Key features – granite and stainless steel – gets them everytime.

          • I’m sure that some how some where that makes sense to you. Love that new nanny state rule in Van ..no door nobs? LOL I guess all the Greens and Dippers will have to leave town.

          • Oh yeah, building access in at the construction stage, which doesn’t cost is such a bad idea. You want to build something that only the physically able will buy because the disabled or families with disabled members don’t buy houses or condos.

          • I’m not usually a grammarian, but please, consider punctuation, I can hardly make out what you’re saying.

            Yes, people who need brand new houses out in brand new suburbs will pay more. You know many poor people doing that?

            Raising taxes can hurt the poor, yes, which is why we need to stop giving city taxes to subsidize the private developers.. so that we don’t need to raise them to pay for the public services we do need.

          • Umm. That was actually the point I was making because I’m outraged that developers like Wenzel are getting these subsides & now Wenzels lawsuit further dips into public purse which in turn Hurts ME I’m recently & quite suddenly disabled & consequently POOR

          • That is a false argument. The subsidy you refer to is for infrastructure TO the suburbs not IN the suburbs. What about the subsides for walking paths,bridges, bike lanes and paths etc etc that inner city residents get. Do inner city residents use the road systems between the suburbs? Of course they do.

            But that is not the real issue it is an issue Nenshi created for his re election. The real issue is and was that Nenshi and his staff are against new suburbs because of their GREEN political leanings.

            They have essentially declared war on home builders. As a result, the home builders tried to organize to get people elected who are pro suburbs just as Nenshi worked to get his ultra left wing Alderman re elected.

            Then Nenshi vilified the builders for organizing and stated the no political parties should be involved in municipal politics all the while apparently accepting help from a Federal Political Party. Can you say hypocrite?

          • They’ve declared war on homebuilders? Really? So they’re not allowing homes to be built where we already have the infrastructure to serve them? That’s news to me…

            ..mostly because it’s a load of crap.

          • Stanley and Nenshi want further densification. I guessed they missed that Calgary has the densest neighborhoods in Canada.

            The builders have large land inventories to build new suburbs which the Greens and Nenshi oppose and want to stop.

            So yes they have declared war on them by trying to block new neighborhoods.

            If that’s news to you you’re not paying attention to all the news!

          • That’s a bunch of bull. Sidewalks &?walking paths etc. are for every ones use I don’t mind paying for those because I use them & enjoy them. But I sure as he’ll don’t think it ok to pay subsides to developers so they can make a bigger profit that is absolutely ridiculous Calgary is the only city that I have lived in that pay subsides to builders on things they should be automatically budgeting into the building cost before your profit. Builders in other cities & other provinces have figured this out & managed to make profits. It seems to me the builders out here are mostly winy children with a false sense of entitlement. If I buy a house I fully expect the cost of utility infrastructure to be included in the price of the home & don’t mind paying for that if it’s going to be my house. To suggest or expect otherwise is beyond basic common sense

          • Oh boy!

        • we had a major flood…!!

          • The vote to keep any money refunded occurred long before that Skippy. More Nenshi spin

      • Sure a lot more manufactured outrage towards Nenshi. A lot more than there was for Bronconnier… Wonder why that is?

        • There’s a few reasons, actually. And some of it is Nenshi’s fault — he’s not politic at all. Even when he attempts to be so it’s incredibly transparent that that’s what he’s trying to do. He has no problem calling people out in fairly plain terms when they’re doing something he’s opposed to. That pisses people off.

          Some of it, if we’re being honest, is that he’s brown, muslim, and gay-friendly. Kind of a trifecta of the “other” that has been used to drive fear into some people for so long.

          Some of it is that he’s not a conservative. That’s a big enough strike for folks like Bell. (see http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/26/calgary-suns-rick-bell-humourless-unrepentant-lefty/)

          And some of it is that he’s comfortable in his situation and isn’t beholden to anybody. His elections haven’t been funded, or even supported, by the usual Calgary elite, so he owes them nothing, and that makes them nervous, and willing to move against him — especially when he’s putting forward policies that will benefit the average citizens over the private contractors.

          • LOL…not everyone likes Nenshi, sorry to burst your bubble. And it’s not because of the usual skin colour / religion / preferences rubric lazily tossed out by his supporters. His arrogance is beyond belief.

          • Just 88% approval rating which is huge… Sure not every “anti-Nenshi” is a bigot, but every bigot is “anti-Nenshi”. His arrogance? Have you heard of a man called Rob Ford? Give me a break… Every “anti-Nenshi” somehow confuses his confidence with arrogance or should I say being uppity.

          • I would suggest bigotry is fairly specific, depending on the individual…there will be folks bigoted towards “X” who aren’t bigoted towards “Y”. So no, not all bigots are “anti-Nenshi”; your statement doesn’t make sense (but, like most sophistry, sounds like it should). Where did Rob Ford even enter this discussion? And how do you know you’re not the one confusing confidence with arrogance?

          • And Wenzel’s in that video isn’t?
            When Councillors are just sponsored playthings of a few rich people that illustrates a degree of arrogance that Nenshi never approaches. It’s also interesting that his little tantrum after being called out by Nenshi reveals that he is used to getting his way and doesn’t understand why the usual methods never worked this time out.

          • Sorry…Wenzel’s arrogance isn’t at issue here, and I don’t see the validity in bringing it up. The fact Wenzel may or may not be equally as arrogant in no way detracts from Nenshi’s arrogance.

          • Ha ha

            Welcome to the internet. You don’t get to say what is at issue or not, the thread goes where it goes and right now the arrogance quotient quite firmly puts the SLAPP suitor at the top of the ladder. The fact he thinks he can win a suit based on what he actually said shows he is over reaching to a huge degree.

            And since when would you want to run as Mayor and not be arrogant, let alone stand to do the job twice with all the Wild Rose knuckle draggers targeting you, no matter what you did. Mayors need to be confident, bright and leaders – a decent level of arrogance is kind of a job requirement.

            House builders on the other hand need to know how to build decent houses and not try and raise money to ensure useful people get elected. Oh and let’s not forget the threats from the “family”

          • At issue = on topic, something you are apparently having difficulty with. Wenzel wasn’t in my reply because he has nothing to do with Nenshi’s arrogance. If you have a beef with him, have at ‘er buddy..my comments on Nenshi remain, regardless of any axe you may choose to grind against Wenzel.

          • I guess we are quite a way down the thread but the genesis of this thread was all about the Law suit and the housing mess going on. That kind of influenced my replies.

          • Calgary got rid of at least one arrogant councillor this past election. We also lost one great councillor….Dale Hodges to retirement after 30 years.

          • Wow, really? You obviously couldn’t be bothered to read even my first paragraph before assuming what I said, because you ended up repeating it, and yet you accuse Nenshi of being arrogant?

            Might I suggest you familiarize yourself with Matthew 7:1-5?

          • Actually I read your post very well thank you, and what you choose to describe as not “politic” (judicious, sensible) glosses over (as Nenshiites seem wont to do) the man’s glaring arrogance (self-importance, egotism). And please….preaching to make your point adds nothing to your argument. As I recall didn’t Matthew also warn against false prophets? Anyway… elections are all about judging people, and I find him wanting in many respects. Sorry if you cannot handle that.

          • No, I’m afraid I simply don’t see it. Arrogance means having an exaggerated sense of his own importance or abilities. Can you present evidence of this? Because just about every time I’ve seen him, he’s busy praising somebody else’s work, or explaining how he’s part of a larger group. Or even how he’s been wrong about things previously. That’s rather the opposite of arrogance.

            Or is it simply, as I said, that he “has no problem calling people out in fairly plain terms when they’re doing something he’s opposed to.” That’s not arrogance, that’s confidence. Admitted, you don’t get the first without the second, but they are not inextricably linked either.

            You’re welcome to judge him on any basis you want, but when you make assertions such as “His arrogance is beyond belief,” and present zero evidence to back it up, expect that some people may call you on it.

          • Hmm, off hand I’d say determining he knows “best” about the disposition of $52MM belonging to taxpayers is arrogance. (Even if the need is borne of necessity re: floods). The money, simply, is not his — it’s the taxpayer’s. Make your case and live with what the people tell you, not with what you think is best. (Yes, sometimes hard choices have to be made….but the way this tax rebate has been handled evidenced more a desire to fulfill his own agenda behind closed doors than it did any desire to actually find out what the populace wanted done with the money).

            Or you can go with his belief that he knows best on how the city will develop, developers and the general populace be damned — plain speech may not have landed him in a defamation suit, but hyperbolic musings (“Godfather”? Really?) stemming from an inherent attitude that his way is not to be questioned did. (Two arrogant types battling it out there to be sure … nevertheless Nenshi is not exonerated simply because his opponent may be similarly inclined).

            Or his idea of endorsing counselors, as if simply by making his favour known it would speed his chosen few to victory come election night? Again, an attempt to ensure that he would have a Nenshi-friendly council so his mandates would not be questioned? Hail Caesar, but I thought the days of Imperial Rome were a thing of the past.

            So no — my personal belief is it’s not at all just a matter of him presenting things in unvarnished, plain terms. Well spoken he can be; but behind the silvery verbiage there is nonetheless an overarching attitude there that goes beyond merely having confidence in his approach and crosses that thin line into self-importance.
            But that’s politics right? You view him one way, I view him the other — and neither of us are likely to change our views unless he does something out of the ordinary. Until that day happens — cheers!

          • So Nenshi is arrogant because of a decision of the whole Council, is arrogant because, as leader of the city he has plan on how the city should develop, is arrogant because when he saw someone promoting illegal activity, he called them out on it, and because, as a politician, he endorsed other politicians who agree with him.

            Honestly, I think the one who’s arrogant here is you, because none of what he’s done is beyond his position, nor is it even, if we believe the results of the people you are saying he is affronting, against the wishes of the vast majority. Yet you seem to be quite arrogant in thinking that your opinion of how the city should develop should hold more water than the person actually elected to handle it.

          • You bet chum — my opinion is that his actions betray an underlying arrogance. Not “plain speaking” or “telling it like it is”. Arrogance.
            Live with it, even if you don’t agree with it. Or is freedom of thought a foreign concept?
            I find it interesting that, having been presented with an opinion critical of Nenshi, you would feel the necessity to go on a tired ad hominem attack to further “advance” your opinion to the contrary. To what end? It’s your opinion vs. mine, neither of us are going to change the other’s view at this time. Is he really that fragile, and is it really that necessary to you that everyone like him? Is it arrogance for you to opine that those who classify Nenshi as arrogant are themselves arrogant for having expressed such an opinion? (Seems to be a tad of irony there.)
            Not interested in trading barbs old boy, because your opinion of what I am or am not is as irrelevant to the topic at hand as my opinion would be of you. Since the topic at hand is Nenshi’s qualifications as #2 — and having demonstrated our obviously differing opinions in that regard in what is, after all, an opinion piece — tying up further bandwidth on Maclean’s servers seems reasonably pointless. Enjoy your day.

          • “It’s a very nice thing. The most important thing to think about it is that: #1 the prime minister, #2 myself, both Calgarians, and really talking about how the centre of influence I think is shifting to Calgary and to the west, and I think that’s a really neat thing. But I don’t really understand this list. Is it most powerful? Is it most good-looking? I don’t know.

            But I think the issue of power is a very interesting question. And someone asked me today: who’s been left off the list. And one of the things that we learned this summer more than anything else is that real power doesn’t live with government or executives. Real power lives with every single one of us. Every single kid who has a lemonade stand; every single person who cleans out a stranger’s basement. Every single one of us has the power to improve our community. And if I was going to say who Canada’s most powerful people are, I would say: the everyday heroes who every single day make the community better.” – Mayor Naheed Nenshi

            … Yes he’s soooo arrogant.

          • As I said, he can talk up a storm. But actions speak louder than anything he (or his speechwriters) can put on paper or dangle before an audience.
            Might as well leave it mate. You’re not going to change my mind or “disprove” my opinion, and I have ZERO interest in trying to switch yours over. That’s the beauty of a democracy is it not?

          • Yep… you’re bang on. I was trying to be little cheeky, but these folks are crazy up in arms about nothing… sunbot outrage.

          • Mostly it’s that he ran as a fiscal conservative then ramped up business and property taxes at record rates? Maybe it’s that he has an annoying personality? Maybe it’s that he doesn’t care what anyone else thinks and won’t shut his mouth long enough to listen to anyone else?

        • Oh let me guess let’s try to play the race card. Well if an old white guy had run as a fiscal conservative and hiked taxes 30% the media would have torn him apart. Why did Nenshi get a pass from everyone but the Sun?

          Maybe we should examine which Federal political party supported and worked for Nenshi even though Nenshi insisted on political parties being kept out of municipal politics?

          • Fiscal Conservative means paying for what you get. If taxes have to go up to cover today’s expenditure then that it being fiscally conservative in the traditional sense of the word.

            Reform Conservative means cutting taxes and living on loans that someone else will have to pay back later.
            If Calgary gets roads, art, etc then today’s Calgarians pay for what they get. The opposite happens at the federal level where we have racked up massive debt and continue to do so. We have cut taxes to those who support the current government and any thought of paying it off is pushed into the future… somebody else will cover our tab.
            Oh and it was around 20%. The 30% I believe came under the previous mayors reign and I believe he was white and is in the PC Government in Edmonton now.
            So you were saying?

          • You’re hilarious! Your definition of a fiscal conservative is someone who hikes taxes? What Occupy tent did you find that nonsense in? Time to pass the bong

            It was 28.6% over 3 years and last year alone it was 13.1% and the previous Mayor is the trade commisioner in Washington DC at least get your facts straight before beaking off

          • My idea of a fiscal conservative is someone who spends only what they can pay for and doesn’t think anyone else should pick up their tab.
            Your idea seems to define a fiscal conservative as someone who spends and creates debt without intending to pay for it.
            While Conservatives today fit into that latter description it doesn’t mean that there is anything responsible about their fiscal Conservatism.
            As for your number yeah yeah

          • I have made no statements at all about what is a fiscal conservative other than to say Nenshi isn’t one. How you’ve come up with all this left wing mumbo jumbo to distract other readers from the fact that your data is wrong is beyond me.

            A fiscal conservative is someone who wants to reduce deficit spending and reduce overall government spending. I believe Nenshi now has the city in a position where we are at 80% of our credit line and he has on the books a staggering 23 Billion dollars in unfunded infrastructure costs

            Put that in your bong and smoke it.

          • A fiscal conservative is someone that runs a balanced budget that’s it. The fact that neo-cons and neo-lliberals think it is all about reducing taxes is a relatively recent development. Fiscal Conservatives fuss over taxes, fiscal conservatives dislike debt and prefer a small surplus so that one can save for a rainy day in order to conserve the order. (See conserve and conservatism.)
            Fiscal Conservatives reduce taxes and cut services not because they are fiscally conservative they do it it out of a dogmatic, neo-liberal need to kill government. Fiscal conservatives just want to balance the books.
            I realise you have drunk the neo-Con kool aid but that doesn’t mean you get to conflate terms.

          • Oh here we go with the left wing neo con blah blah blah
            You don’t have a friginn clue what you’re talking about

          • Your answer indicates otherwise

          • don’t wory, Harebell, Keywest just performed a ‘reductio ad absurdam’ you knoiw, when you put your hands over your ears and sing because you’ve run out of ideas.

          • I’m just kind of sad. I thought maybe I could have a decent reasoned discussion with someone from the right side of the spectrum but just like commenting with the blogging Tories it’s pointless because a rational right winger doesn’t exist.

          • Uh. An old white guy DID.. That’d be Bronconnier. Guess why he got a pass?

          • He hardly got a pass and he was a Liberal and ran for the Liberal Party. He didn’t run again because he didn’t have the free pass from the media Nenshi’s had

      • Wow, the Nenshi spin machine is in full gear. You are confusing the total mill rate with the city’s portion of the tax increase which Nenshi has raised by nearly 30% over his first three years.

        Further, It was under Nenshi that City Hall decided to keep any monies refunded by other levels of government and because we now have a new council that policy was reversed, nothing to do with his purpleness.

        The lawsuit is because Nenshi, who is backed and helped by a Federal Political Party tried to bully Calgarians from organizing against him. His policies regarding suburbs basically declared war on home builders and when they dared challenge his purpleness they were met with a media blitz and vilification for trying to elect a slate to represent their interests as every citizen has a right to do.

        One thing about Nenshi apologists they never found a fact they couldn’t twist for their own purposes!

        • What federal party? Last I remember he was a member of the Alberta Party before he ran for mayor.

          “Nenshi apologists”? Wow… now that’s some good spin.

          • If you did a little research you’d realize the Alberta Party is only a Provincial Party. Don’t like apologists how about sycophants?

            What color does your baloney turn if you leave it the fridge for a year?

    • Fake outrage is lame…

    • He’s the media darling because his well healed friends invite them to all their garden parties. To the rest of us he’s a tax plague.

      • I don’t know about well healed, but he does make it out to pretty much all Calgary events where regular people are…also the odd pub or music venue to catch a show. Yes, how arrogant and snobby of him

        • Yes he’s a regular with the hipster set.

          • Because only “hipsters” enjoy live music and cultural events… Sounds like you need to get out more.

  10. YAY NENSHI!!!!

  11. Jian Ghomeshi’s inclusion suggests that this list is of Canada’s most self-important people.

    • Best comment today. Thanks.

  12. Jerry Dias was #3 on the list this year…in years to come I expect you’ll see him #1….

    • Follow Jerry on Twitter at: @JerryPDias and join our Union #ForTheWorkingClass

  13. Nice one Nenshi!!!

  14. that time of year again – lists!
    filler for magazines – petty irrelevance for the rest of us.

    • Obscurity has no heroes.

  15. That list is another reason why, I have not renewed my subscription with Macleans.

    • I get that…. I’ll not renew mine either. Macleans is a shill for the Harpers.

  16. Drake(!), you’re kidding, right?

  17. LOL…Glad to see Nenshi’s shameless, publicity-hounding, “aw shucks” attitude suckered enough out-of-touch editors to get him a completely undeserved second. All he does is raise taxes and bask in false modesty. Confirms to me why I don’t read Maclean’s.

    • Get a life… 88% approval rating, the most popular mayor in Canada and it drives you crazy i know. The biggest “arrogance” is pretending you speak for Calgarians who just voted him a second term in a landslide.

      • Doesn’t drive me crazy at all old boy; of those that bothered to vote (39.43% total turnout, down about 13% from 2010), 74% who cast their votes for mayor chose him. I did vote, and no I didn’t choose him. Not sure where your 88% comes from — regardless he won, he’s mayor, and that’s democracy in action. This in no way affects my opinion — and it is my opinion, don’t know where you got the idea I was speaking for anyone else — of what he is or how he operates, or why he is ill-qualified to be the 2nd most powerful person in Canada according to this list. Chill out and have a beer — sounds to me like you’re the one opening a vein over someone not climbing on board the Nenshi Magical Mystery Bandwagon.

        • People didn’t show up because they’re quite content with Nenshi..Municipal elections are always low when there are high approval ratings… His vote percentage probably would have been higher considering a sun poll, yes an SUN poll said 88% approval rating just days before the election. I supported Nenshi after the first time I heard him speak on CJSW 90.9 fm in 2010 so no bandwagon here.

          • Regardless of your squabble, the fact that Nenshi is there and Hazel McCallion is not is absurd, especially when it comes to the only politician with more land-slide victories, and a consistently higher overall approval rating (over 3 decades) than anyone else in history.

          • Along with Nenshi, I don’t really understand how they comprised this list. Just pointing out that Nenshi hating is kind of ridiculous. I’ve never hated a politician as much as these guys hate Nenshi.

    • Well in your compound you can replace him with a picture of Ted Cruz.

      • Ah, an attempt at insightful wit. Keep trying!

  18. this is a ridiculous list. Perhaps 10 names deserve to be on it. Another invented article courtesy of the positively average Macleans magazine

  19. aka: names the ‘author’ could both spell and google…..sigh….

  20. Jim Flaherty is 27? James Moore is 14? Ok how did that happen? You have Jennifer Keesmaat but no Rob Ford. I think you guys at Maclean’s were on crack when you did this list.

  21. Where is K’naan? You said he was part of the 50 but where is he mentioned?

  22. I hope the issue explains why John Baird is not on the list, but his Chief of Staff is? Curious.

  23. Why do you continually prop up Loreen Harper and their painful marriage? The entire country knows she ran off with her female RCMP body guard. By continually ignoring the facts, you discredit yourself MacLeans. I have to rethink my subscription if your reporting is so unreliable. Last week you had another article painting a rosy picture of them. You (MacLeans) are becoming a shill for the Harpers.

  24. I think Stephen Harper’s cat, winkles, should have placed.

  25. I am not a fan of either Trudeau or Mulcair, but I have to say that Mulcair is a much more intelligent and thoughtful person than Trudeau. You seem to think that if someone is flashy as in Trudeau and Nenshi, it gives them status. How shallow. What has Nenshi truly done to warrant all the attention. When there’s a flood, any leader will do his utmost to help. Nenshi is not a God, contrary to some journalists’ beliefs.

  26. Colby is a jackass much the same as nunshy, please do more to take nunshy to toronto, you will love having tax increases starting at 6.1% and you will love this spendshi as I am sure you need more foreign art to mess up your landscape and you have many many lib loving journalists with big cameras and nunnuts will love that so you guys are made for each other so hurry up fill your boots please take him.

  27. Anthony Germain is not here. Why? Are you unaware of his work for the CBC in China and Africa? Canada goes global, and you ignore that.

  28. No John Manley in the top 50 is a bit of a surprise.
    Interesting to see that Jen Keesmaat made the list, though!

  29. Conehead…!

  30. hay, where am I???

  31. Whiners…..


  33. I’ve read a few just right stuff here. Certainly value bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how much effort you put to create this type of wonderful informative website.


Sign in to comment.