Trudeau takes a swing at Quebec religion plan; other politicians stay on sidelines -

Trudeau takes a swing at Quebec religion plan; other politicians stay on sidelines


MONTREAL – Justin Trudeau became the first prominent federal politician to oppose Quebec’s controversial plan to ban religious headwear for public employees.

The Liberal leader castigated the idea and said the Parti Quebecois government would damage Quebec’s reputation if it proceeded with such a policy.

Trudeau, who happened to be in Quebec City on Wednesday, added the topic to the agenda of a previously scheduled meeting with Premier Pauline Marois.

Other party leaders, meanwhile, avoided comment.

A media report this week published leaked details of the controversial PQ proposal — saying it would prohibit people like doctors, teachers and public-daycare workers from donning turbans, kippas, hijabs and visible crucifixes.

After his meeting with Marois, Trudeau said they agreed to disagree. The Liberal leader said the plan was motivated by a defensive “fear of the other” and unworthy of modern Quebec.

“Like we saw with the (recent) soccer turban ban, people laughed at Quebecers,” said Trudeau, a Quebec MP.

“And I don’t think it’s who we are and I don’t think it honours us to have a government that does not represent our generosity and openness of spirit as a people.”

The Prime Minister’s Office, for its part, said: “It’s a debate that will occur at the provincial level.” The previous day NDP Leader Tom Mulcair, whose party has nearly five-dozen seats in Quebec, sidestepped the issue by calling the leaked report a “trial balloon.”

Trudeau said the purported plan was responding to a non-existent problem and said he couldn’t understand which rights the PQ was seeking to protect that weren’t already protected in the Canadian or Quebec charters of rights.

He said state institutions should indeed be neutral, like the Quebec government says, but he added that the individuals who work there are entitled to their religion and freedom of expression.

The best remedy to fear of outsiders, he said, is already taking place in Quebec: kids from all over the world are getting to know each other, learning French, playing hockey, and contributing to a Quebecois culture that doesn’t negate their roots.

Past polls have suggested such a plan would have strong public support in Quebec. However, news of the impending details has drawn the wrath of several Quebecers.

It even prompted a warning from some religious ethnic minorities working in the province’s health-care system: Pass legislation like this, and prepare for longer wait times at the hospital.

Quebec will lose public employees including doctors if the government insists on banning religious symbols in the workplace, said one physician from Montreal’s Sikh community.

Dr. Sanjeet Singh Saluja, who wears a turban as part of his faith, said Wednesday that the PQ’s controversial “Charter of Quebec Values” would drive people from the Sikh, Jewish and Muslim communities away.

“The sad thing is I don’t know if I’d be able to stay here in Quebec,” said Saluja, an emergency-room doctor with the McGill University Health Centre.

“Even though I love my practice here in Quebec, my faith is something that’s important to me and I don’t feel comfortable giving up that part of my persona and I don’t think a lot of people would be willing to, either.”

Saluja, who was born and raised in Montreal, said this type of legislation could have a significant impact on hospital wait times in Montreal because many resident physicians in the city come from Middle Eastern countries and wear hijabs.

Several Montreal hospitals, he added, rely heavily on residents in many day-to-day functions.

“One of the reasons why we are able to sort of diminish these wait times is because we have these residents who come in and take on patient loads,” said Saluja, who believes young doctors would choose other provinces over Quebec if they didn’t feel welcome here.

Quebec has been bleeding residents to other provinces for decades, with net losses in migration that have diminished the province’s economic and political clout.

Its political weight consisted of 27 per cent of the House of Commons seats in the late 1970s, is 24 per cent today, and will drop to 23 per cent in the next federal election.

“This is not only one group that’s being isolated here,” Saluja said.

“This is an entire section of the Quebec population (so) it’s not going just to be the matter of one doctor, it’s going to be a matter of doctors many doctors leaving.”

A spokeswoman for McGill said training for the Middle Eastern residents is funded by their own governments. She said their Montreal stints usually last from four to six years and the university admits approximately 35-40 trainees per year.

Another Montreal health-care professional warned that if a single person left her department wait times there could grow nearly 50 per cent.

She said many employees wear religious headgear.

By losing just one staffer, speech-language pathologist Kathy Malas estimated that the wait times would easily grow from 17 months to 25 months.

“It’s actually very sad that they’re using people’s sentiments and this kind of subject, which is very sensitive, as a political tool,” said Malas, a born-and-raised Montrealer who wears a Muslim veil.

She said the government should focus its attention on creating programs to teach Quebecers about each other, rather than proposing bans.

In recent days, Malas said she’s been asked many times whether she would quit her job or remove her veil if such a policy were eventually passed.

She said she would do neither.

“I would actually fight for my rights to keep my veil and stay at work because I sincerely believe it’s a fundamental right,” said Malas, who doesn’t believe the proposed policy will ever become law.

The PQ minority government, lagging behind in popularity, hopes to win votes by championing a “secularism” plan that polls have suggested has considerable support in the province.

The government says it expects to present the charter this fall — although it’s not clear yet that the plan will get support from opposition parties, which hold a majority of seats in the legislature.

It’s also unclear yet whether the plan, even if it proves popular, would sway voters in the next election campaign.

Polls have suggested that while the idea has strong support it’s far less of a priority for Quebec voters than other issues, like the economy.

While Trudeau attacked the PQ plan, the NDP leader was more cautious when asked about it while in Montreal on Tuesday.

“I’m not going to respond to trial balloons,” said Mulcair, adding his party presented a substantive report in 2007 before Quebec’s Bouchard-Taylor commission on the accommodation of minorities.

“When there is something concrete on the table, I’ll have no hesitation to respond to it.”

The Government of Ontario, however, reacted to the PQ proposal Wednesday without any prompting in an issued statement.

“Our government would oppose the introduction of any legislation in Ontario to restrict or prohibit people’s freedom of expression and religion in public places,” Ontario Immigration Minister Michael Coteau said in the news release with the heading: “Religious Symbols and Coverings in Places that Receive Public Funding.”

“Ontario’s diversity and freedom of expression and religion is a model to the world — where we celebrate and respect each other’s differences.”

The PQ proposal would let culturally specific hospitals — like Montreal’s Jewish General — seek an exemption, according to the leaked details in a tabloid newspaper.

The same newspaper has interviewed headscarf-wearing daycare workers who say they would quit their jobs if forced to choose between their religious beliefs and their work.

“I left my country and my family behind for a better life here. Now, I get the impression I’m being told to drop everything and go back home,” Zakia Maali told the Journal de Montreal.

“There’s nothing that will make me remove this. If I lose my job, it’ll be unemployment for me, and then welfare. Too bad.”

For his part, Saluja said he doesn’t believe such a policy would ever pass in Quebec because he has never known it to be a closed-minded place.

“I’ve never had a Quebecer come up to me and tell that I don’t belong here,” he said.

“Personally, I’m hurt. I’m very hurt.”

– with files from Nelson Wyatt, Alexander Panetta

Filed under:

Trudeau takes a swing at Quebec religion plan; other politicians stay on sidelines

  1. Kenney has tweeted against it, which should win the 2013 award for cognitive dissonance after he went after Muslim women who wanted to wear veils in citizenship ceremonies.

    • He was mistweeted.

  2. “The Prime Minister’s Office, for its part, said: “It’s a debate that
    will occur at the provincial level.” The previous day NDP Leader Tom
    Mulcair, whose party has nearly five-dozen seats in Quebec, sidestepped
    the issue by calling the leaked report a “trial balloon.”

    Mulcair’s position is maybe defensible, depending on what actually went into that report on accommodation…little faint hearted though. A fence sitter really. The pmo’s remarks are just flat out bizarre, and concerning. Just when will they defend national charter rights? Only if it doesn’t piss off the provinces? Only when they absolutely must or there’s some political advantage to doing do? This is the real deep down worry with this govt, one that chooses political or ministerial discretion over the law and principle. And i mean explicitly “chooses,” as opposed to mere cowardice, which we have seen from time to time from previous Liberal govts, that i find merely human, although not at all admirable.

  3. Good for Trudeau. He’s right.

  4. Good on Trudeau for being the one leader to get up and say the right thing.

  5. What else can we expect from this nice hairdo with nothing under it, the dauphin Justine. Remember this is the same idiot that complained about the correct language used to describe practices like Female Genital Mutilation and ‘Honor Killing’. The word he complained about was ‘barbaric’ but really what other word fits those practices except barbaric. I happen to agree with this new Quebec law it’s about time the people and politicians of this country quit bending over and kissing the shoes of these immigrants who refuse to assimilate or even attempt to adapt to the ways of their new home country. The only reason that Justine is doing this is like his two faced and fork tongued daddy Pierre did similar actions. To buy votes from the immigrant community, but it’s obvious that tactic no longer works except the extremist or jihadi types who don’t really care about this country except as a base to launch their terror attacks from. Even they I doubt would care either way. As for the so called ‘religious dress’ like the niquab or burka no where in the Koran does it state that women have to go around in a tent hiding from the world. The only one’s pushing that idea are the misogynistic Muslim men who wish to control their women as it dates back to the tribal days from before even Mohammad and Islam. Therefore the so called religious dress being banned is not discriminatory nor against the Charter rules regarding religious freedoms. So why not do like France and other western nations who are coming to realize the cancer that Islamic immigration and multiculturalism has become on our freedoms and secular societies.

    • Why do you call him Justine, you racist witch? No matter what you think of his politics, that’s a married man with two kids, and a third on the way. Don’t know the difference between man and woman yet?

    • “…it’s about time the people and politicians of this country quit bending
      over and kissing the shoes of these immigrants who refuse to assimilate
      or even attempt to adapt to the ways of their new home country.”

      And here we find the explanation for Harper’s, and to a lesser extent, Mulcair’s reluctance to do the right thing – too many people like laverne are the base of their support. This leaves the door wide open for Trudeau to be seen as the only leader who will take a stand against this kind of racism. Trudeau is not going to get votes from people who support this kind of nonsense anyway, so he has nothing to lose.

      And Loraine – the fact that laverne uses Justine reflects on laverne, not Trudeau. My advice, for what it is worth, is that if someone wants to make themselves look stupid, you let them.