What we know about Mike Duffy and the $90,172 repayment

A glimpse of how Mike Duffy’s busy campaign schedule overlapped with the Senate business


OTTAWA – Conservative Sen. Mike Duffy submitted expense claims while Parliament was dissolved during the last federal election, reporting he was on Senate business on days he appeared to be campaigning for the party.

The full extent of Duffy’s Senate expenses during the writ period remains a mystery — the Conservative government is refusing to reveal the full breakdown of the senator’s claims and his repayment of $90,172.24.

But independent auditors at the firm Deloitte listed Duffy as being in Ottawa on Senate business and claiming a daily expense for seven days in April 2011, a month that was dominated by campaigning for the May 2 vote.

He was also listed as being on Senate business at an “other location” on another six days. Using cellphone records, Deloitte managed to catch one inappropriate “other location” claim from 2012 while Duffy was in Florida.

But the auditors said they remained in the dark about whether taxpayers paid his expenses on many other days, since Duffy failed to fully disclose his activities and records.

Social media and newspaper reports offer a glimpse of how Duffy’s busy campaign schedule overlapped with the Senate business he reported to auditors:

— On April 5, Duffy spoke to the Kootenay-Columbia Conservative association in British Columbia. His travel claims indicated he was on Senate business.

— On April 8, candidate Sandy Lee tweeted that she was meeting Duffy in Norman Wells, N.W.T. Lee’s campaign paid Duffy $209.01 in expenses. His travel claims indicated he was on Senate business.

— On April 21, Duffy was reportedly campaigning with candidate Scott Armstrong in Nova Scotia. Armstrong’s campaign paid Duffy $409.91 in expenses.

— On April 28, Duffy appeared to have a busy day in the Toronto area, campaigning with candidates Maureen Harquail, Wladyslaw Lizon and Gin Siow. Lizon’s campaign paid Duffy $169.45, as did Siow. His travel claims indicated he was on Senate business.

— On April 29, former cabinet minister Lawrence Cannon tweeted a picture of Duffy at an event outside of Ottawa that same day. The Deloitte audit listed Duffy as being in Ottawa on Senate business and claiming a per diem.

If Duffy collected daily Senate expenses while on the Conservative campaign trail, taxpayer may have paid twice: Conservative candidates who paid for Duffy’s hotel stays would have received federal rebate money for those expenses.

Duffy’s campaign events did not end there. On at least five other occasions documented in media reports, Duffy campaigned with Conservative candidates. He did not tell Deloitte about his campaign calendar, forcing Deloitte to list his activities as “undocumented.”

Meanwhile, the public Senate attendance register does not cover April or May 2011, the period that Parliament was dissolved.

“We are not on a leave of absence — Parliament was dissolved — we are still senators. However, all party work we are doing is paid for by the party,” Duffy told Postmedia News during the campaign.

“MPs continue to be paid. So do we.”

Duffy did not respond to a phone call or an email message requesting comment.

On Wednesday, the prime minister’s office revealed that Stephen Harper’s chief of staff Nigel Wright had given Duffy the $90,000 he needed for housing expense repayment as a gift.

But Duffy appeared to contradict that, according to a CTV News report Wednesday night. The network said it received an email from Duffy in which he claimed he repaid his expense claims with a loan from the Royal Bank and that “Nigel played no role.”

Once the repayment was made, Deloitte said Duffy ended his participation in the audit, stopping short of providing financial records, credit card statements and information about his calendar. He also did not meet with the auditors.

“Based on the information provided in the travel claims, it is not clear from the claims where Sen. Duffy was located on days he claimed per diem amounts,” Deloitte wrote.

Sen. Mac Harb, formerly a Liberal who is now independent and contesting a Senate demand he repay $51,482 in housing-related expenses, is also listed as having been in Ottawa on Senate business on four days during the federal election period, but reported no Senate business outside of Ottawa.

Sen. Patrick Brazeau, also now independent after being kicked out of the Conservative caucus, only listed one day of Senate business in Ottawa during the writ period. He is also fighting a demand for repayment of $48,744 in housing expenses.

Deloitte also highlighted six expense claims when Harb said he was in Ottawa on “Senate business” without being able to prove what he was doing, and two for Brazeau. In both cases, Harb and Brazeau provided Deloitte with more documents than Duffy, and met with the auditors in person.

Filed under:

What we know about Mike Duffy and the $90,172 repayment

  1. Duffy does it all! He’s corrupt, he’s an attack dog, he’s fiscally incompetent, he’s ripping off taxpayers. He’s every Conservative trait rolled into one.

    • That photo of him raising a wine glass should be the new CPC logo.

    • And he was appointed by Stephen Harper. But where does the buck stop on this one? They gonna pin it on Michael Sona?

      • You can follow Michael Sona on Twitter now; he’s havin’ a larf at this whole Duffy debacle. I do believe Harper’s legacy will be one of corruption and court cases, tempered by the occasional Beatles tune.

    • “every Conservative trait rolled into one”… If one considers Duffy’s figure then he could literally be every Conservative rolled into one… figuratively speaking of course.

  2. penashue and now Duffy. What’s witht he CPC pulling crap with travel expenses?

    • Oda’s expenses were a little troublesome too, as I recall. And just as she was brought down by her own greed, so too will Duffy and eventually, the government. Because things like a guy writing a $90,000 personal cheque to cover up expense fraud for an entitled, appointed shill is the kind of thing the rest of us cannot do: we know it’s wrong and will not accept.

  3. Obviously the $90,000.00 was an attempt to put a lid on this pot of festering sludge, and try and change the topic to something other than putting a Conservative bag man / trained voting machine in the senate.

    Seems that’s failing — a rare event for Steve’s message massaging folks —

  4. Shocking revelations!

Sign in to comment.