Why Rachel Notley will need an even bigger miracle to win again - Macleans.ca
 

Why Rachel Notley will need an even bigger miracle to win again

The longer the Alberta NDP are in power, the harder it will be to repeat the shocking victory that won them the province


 
Alberta Premier Rachel Notley speaks about her Fort McMurray wildfire experience during an interview in Edmonton Alta, on Monday May 30, 2016. (Jason Franson/CP)

Alberta Premier Rachel Notley (Jason Franson/CP)

Striding out of Banff Trail School, Todd Strong expressed pride in what he’d just done. The Calgary massage therapist had voted to end four decades of Alberta Tory rule, and the power grabs that had come to define it. He’d voted for the right-wing Wildrose Party in 2012, but in 2015 chose something novel: the NDP, led by the likable Rachel Notley. “It’s a new option,” he said.

Two years later, Strong is still proud he voted for change. And he’s itching to do it again. He’s unhappy with “dumb policies” like the carbon tax and an energy efficiency program in which installers made house calls to change light bulbs and shower heads. “I didn’t realize they were going to do that when I voted for them,” he says. When he marks a provincial ballot in 2019, he’ll again determine which party’s the most likely government-slayer.

Notley’s party vaulted from four seats to a shocking 54-seat majority because more than 477,000 Albertans broke habit like Strong did. More than halfway through its term‚ and still generally fielding more blame for the now-bygone economic plunge than credit for the current recovery, the New Democrats’ two right-wing opposition rivals have merged into the United Conservative Party (UCP), and will pick a leader by October’s end. Whether they crown federal cabinet veteran Jason Kenney or former Wildrose chief Brian Jean, it may not matter: based on the current mood, converting enough first-time NDP voters into second-time voters will likely take another miracle, a reversal of fortunes as dramatic as the one that first brought Notley into power.

READ: Alberta’s Rachel Notley escalates spat with Saskatchewan’s Brad Wall

As a midterm examination of sorts, Maclean’s interviewed dozens of voters in some parts of Alberta where NDP support surged in 2015. In those pockets of give-them-a-shot open-mindedness, many feel whipsawed by the degree of change Albertans got, and fairly certain some corrective action must loom ahead.

Lola Zbukvich of Sherwood Park, Alta., is among those with regrets. “I thought if I voted NDP it would scare the Conservatives, but they’d still win,” she says, enjoying sun beneath the palm tree of her seniors’ complex atrium. “I didn’t think that everybody else was thinking the same way I did.” Zbukvich can’t say she’s seen much change for the better, and what improvements she’s aware of, like the carbon tax, she dreads as adding to seniors’ cost of living. “Groceries become so expensive, sometimes we go without,” she says.

Sherwood Park is a large bedroom community east of the Edmonton region’s massive oil refineries. The NDP’s 2015 sweep of the traditionally NDP-friendly Edmonton extended to every urban and semi-urban riding on its outskirts, where it had little historical support. Having captured six per cent of votes in the Sherwood Park riding in 2012, the NDP hit 52 per cent last time. That surge’s beneficiary, MLA Annie McKitrick, says sometimes first-time voters will praise the party’s performance. But often they’ll say they’re unhappy. “It’s hard to read them and it’s a lot of people who don’t really know what they want,” she says. “They wanted to give a lesson to the PCs. I feel sometimes whatever we do is not going to be good enough for them because we’re NDPers.”

Patrick Becker explains across his kitchen counter that he and many fellow crane operators backed the NDP’s jobs pitch, and its belief in refining oil within Alberta. He was laid off in the spring, as the NDP balked at investing in Phase 2 of a nearby bitumen upgrader at which he worked. (The Tories had backed Phase 1.) With no other resource megaprojects needing his crane work, Becker is driving a concrete truck for half the pay. “They said they wanted to create jobs, keep jobs here,” he says. “The biggest mistake I ever made was voting NDP.”

READ: Rachel Notley takes on pipeline critics—even if they’re from her party

Free-market Conservatives may be even less likely to help subsidize Becker’s old project. But to many in Sherwood Park, the NDP hasn’t been kind to the energy sector. Many families have been stung by job cuts since 2015, after oil prices plunged and NDP reforms began. Becker is part of that hard-to-peg political breed who voted Alberta NDP and roots for Donald Trump. “He said he was gonna put America first, and he did.”

Trump comes up in Alberta politics chatter in a northeast Calgary home too, but differently. Iti Misra, an accountant for an oil field service firm, didn’t vote NDP but is baffled that her city and riding did; 15 of the 23 seats went Notley’s way. She reckons that like U.S. voters, Albertans were fed up with the old system. “People wanted a disruptor,” she said. “They wanted a change, but now everyone is bashing their head against a wall.” Misra thinks they haven’t done badly, but says her sector finds the new government tough to deal with and slow to understand issues.

Misra lives in Calgary—McCall. It had the province’s most dramatic NDP swing: a vote share 14 times greater than in the previous election. At Misra’s voting precinct, zero voters in 2012 grew to 48 in 2015, enough to eke out plurality in a four-way split. Retired civil servant Jack Godfrey was one of those 48, switching from the Liberals. He’s amazed he’s lived to see the day the NDP won Alberta, but thinks they lack experience. He’d be stunned if they’re not wiped out next time. “We’re predominantly free-enterprisers,” he says.

The New Democrats’ improbable sweep also included nine rural seats around northern Alberta. In Whitecourt—Ste. Anne, Oneil Carlier didn’t even have orange lawn signs with his own name until the campaign had nearly ended. He is now the agriculture minister, roasted province-wide for his government’s controversial farm safety bill and recent delays to agricultural society grants. “As those jobs start coming back, I’m confident people will come to realize it’s because of our policies,” he says. On highway repaving and repair projects throughout his district, government signs show not only the cost but the number of jobs taxpayer dollars have “supported.”

Carlier, who lives in the rural district but had spent the past 12 years as an Edmonton-based union administrator, was largely unknown in the riding. He’s now known mainly as a nice guy. “But this is so far beyond him; he’s out of his element totally,” says Dale Krasnow, the mayor of Onoway, Alta., a 1,000-person town 60 km northwest of Edmonton.

On a midweek afternoon at Onoway coffee shop O How Sweet It Is, there are no admitted NDP voters. “But my husband did!” offers owner Tracy Crispin in disbelief. Sitting at a table near a plaque that reads “bulls—t corner,” Ted Latimer says the minimum wage hike is hammering businesses, the coal plant phase-out will shut jobs and the new workers’ compensation requirements for farms are onerous.

Just outside town, accountant Patricia Fish, a self-professed environmentalist and “water warrior,” says she feels fortunate to finally have a premier whose values she trusts. She hopes voters appreciate that a party can’t fix everything in its first term. But she hears the grumbles from some of her clients. “Everything goes through the filter of money—does it make money or not?”

READ: Rachel Notley: ‘We reject the politics of austerity’

David Climenhaga, an NDP-friendly blogger, expects the rural vote is “almost certainly” lost, he wrote in August. “New Democrats will be lucky if they salvage three or four rural seats.” Even if some rural ridings become urban in redistricting, that’s a serious chip off a party that needs 44 seats to keep its majority and has many first-time wins to protect.

Skeptics and NDP boosters will dismiss this string of anecdotes as misleading “anecdata.” Except that it matches the available data, too. In all but one poll since the last election, the NDP was trailing and sometimes placed third behind the Tories and Wildrose. Two polls since July’s United Conservative merger show that party well above 50 per cent and the NDP around 30 per cent, getting clobbered. Janet Brown, a Calgary-based polling consultant, sees a “complete rout”—75 UCP seats, and the NDP almost obliterated outside Edmonton.

Numbers could shift when there’s an opposition leader in place, but “it’s really hard to see the road to victory,” Brown says. “It’s not just about the economy recovering, but seeing that the NDP was responsible for it.” The unemployment rate is off 2016’s peak but was still 8.1 per cent in September, and two years of forecast economic growth doesn’t fully offset the past two years of shrinkage, whether or not the NDP deserves credit for either outcome. Notley and allies swear their programs and infrastructure spending have paved the way for the growth, and warn at every opportunity of brutal cuts from the other side, but the message can prove a hard sell. “I’m realistic that sometimes the best arguments will not change a person’s mind,” says McKitrick, the Sherwood Park MLA.

Notley also keeps stressing the tolerance for gay and transgender Albertans, and the other side’s social conservative leanings. Fears of cultural intolerance helped erase a Wildrose lead in 2012, though the PCs then enjoyed a booming economy that the NDP might not in 2019.

Back in Sherwood Park, air monitoring technologist Jeff Cooper reckons he’s in the minority of first-time NDP voters open to giving them another shot. “Depends on how far to the right the conservatives go,” he says. He’d rather have a fiscally conservative but socially moderate choice, and that could soon arrive.

In recent weeks, two MLAs have quit the UCP caucus because they felt it abandoned the centre, and a Calgary NDP member left because of polarization as well. They could join forces with the one member of the centrist Alberta Party, as could a movement of Red Tories who feel homeless after Kenney’s party takeover. They could play spoiler either way, splitting the anti-NDP vote or the pro-UCP vote.

In either a two-way or three-way fight, Notley’s NDP will need a big UCP stumble or some other drastic upheaval to have any shot at re-election.

MORE ABOUT RACHEL NOTLEY:


 

Why Rachel Notley will need an even bigger miracle to win again

  1. Alberta’s found a way to get rid of another woman premier

    • Why does it always have to be about Gender? Maybe us Albertans just don’t like the choice we made, Danielle Smith looked poised to win until she gutted the wildrose. Albertans don’t care what gender our leaders are, we care that they do a good job.

      • Yeah, right

  2. This has nothing to do with whether the Premier is a women or a man. This has to do with the imposition of a carbon that wasn’t in the election platform. This has to back to back $10 billion deficits($15 billion if you include capital spending). Increasing business cost at every turn from Bill 6 for farmers to minimum wage hikes. For me 2019 can’t come soon enough. Did I vote NDP? No. Will I vote NDP in 2019? No my vote will go to the party that looks most likely to beat the NDP!!!

  3. Amazing…..all those men, good bad indifferent……but you kept them..

    Woman comes along…..suddenly….

    • May I bring up Ed Stelmach, or Jim Prentice???? Both did bad jobs and then were replaced by…. a woman(who also did bad jobs….).

      • Last few years before the fall…….

  4. Notley’s and the AB NDP’s route to victory in 2019 has always been through Jason Kenney being elected as the UCP leader. There’s a chance they can pull off what they pulled off in 2015 again in 2019 if he gets elected as the UCP’s leader. Lots of younger voters in Alberta do not like Jason Kenney currently and a lot of former PC members do not like him either. Kenney is really weak in Edmonton and weaker then Jean in Calgary. Jason Kenney has shown no signs of moderation yet and has mostly been appealing to social conservatives and fiscal conservatives ever since he joined provincial politcs in 2016.The UCP under Jason Kenney may not be moderate enough for non-UCP voters especially since Kenney is trying to market the UCP that has true conservative values. Also Kenney has said lots recently that the UCP needs to be humble otwin and their has no been sign of that from him either yet.Jason Kenney and the UCP has been scaring a lot of people with their anti-NDP and trump like rhetoric to. The AB NDP really does not need rural alberta to win power again but the key to the AB NDP victory again is to solidify Edmonton even more, be really competitive in Calgary and win at least 10-15 seats there next time, keep their seats in other Alberta towns and citites like Lethbridge. This may give them at least a ceiling of around 45-50 seats next time. The Alberta Party may play spoiler in the Alberta NDP’s favor in Calgary to if the UCP is not careful.

    • Mohamed- If you are a fellow Albertan, what’s your position on our fiscal situation? We now have a 25% structural deficit, meaning that either taxes have to go up by 25%, or spending has to be reduced by the same amount in order to balance the books. Are you in favor of tax increases or spending cuts to achieve the necessary. Bear in mind that no tax increase in history has generated the kinds of money originally estimated because tax increase proponents never account for the negative impacts of taxes. They never account for capital flight or simple impacts to business and personal and private profits that always accompany tax increases.
      That leaves cuts to the public sector. Alberta has added 50,000 public sector jobs in two years. You need to add 250,000-400,000 private sector jobs just to fund that, and the policies championed by Notley have acted as roadblocks to those private jobs coming to fruition. So, not only do we need to cut 50,000 public sector jobs, we need to cut the pay and benefits of the remainder.
      We have the highest paid teachers in Canada, and many of the rest of our public sector is in the same court. Most have gold-plated pensions that will pay them almost as much over the course of their retirements as what they earned in their careers, with the growing spread between what’s been set aside and what’s been promised being covered from general revenues. It’s the same formula that killed Detroit, Baltimore, Chicago, St Louis, and San Bernardino, among others.
      What this all means is that an end to the NDP can probably fix the problem. But, another Notley term will put Alberta on an irreversible road to bankruptcy.

      • You already are, Flakey….oil is over.

        • Okay. So let’s imagine we live in some strange universe where you are correct. Absent resource revenue, how do we pay the salaries of all those new government employees, let alone the existing ones? Without a private sector to pay the taxes, how do you pay the people whose jobs are funded with taxes?
          Bonus question: Absent Alberta’s outsized contribution to equalization, where does that money come from? Equalization ain’t exactly gonna fund itself.

          • You already live in that ‘strange universe’.

            Canada does not live on resources revenue…..never did. Alberta does, and you are sinking into the tar pits on that score.

            Don’t confuse that with the actual country.

  5. Conservatives were governing Alberta for over 40 years before they were voted out two and half years ago by the NDP.
    When NDP came to power they found empty treasury, huge deficit and at the same time people of Alberta expected a “miracle” from NDP Government, when oil and gas prices are very low.
    What happened to Alberta Heritage Fund under the PCP? Where are these “big royalties” that was collected by PCP for over 40 years went?
    Compare Alberta Heritage Fund (that was designed to be used in a lean times or when oil and gas was depleted) to what happen in Norway. Norway at the same time period accumulated over one trillion $ in their “Heritage Fund” to be used by the government when oil is used up!!
    A prime example of miss-management (by Alberta) versus good management by Norway Governments.
    The key difference between Alberta and Norway is; that in Norway natural resources are owned by Norway and its people and in Alberta oil and gas is owned by large Multinational Corporations.

    • Unlike Norway, Alberta is obligated to share resource wealth with the federal government. As well, Norway’s sovereign fund is as much the product of punitive taxation as it is resource revenue. The only similarities between our Heritage Fund, currently at $15-17 billion, is that the money is of no value to us.
      Norway’s trillion might as well be a figment of the imagination, as there is virtually no possibility that anyone beyond the fund managers will ever see any measurable economic benefit from it. Every Norwegian family is sitting on a million dollar nest egg that they can never spend. Instead, well paid bureaucrats will spend it for them, ostensibly for their benefit. Having endured decades of penury to build up the account, the average Norwegian will, at best, see benefits that are basically intangible.
      Absent a clear goal from the very start, government savings accounts are a very bad idea. Holding excess taxation over for future use is not a bad idea. Doing so without clear goals is a very bad idea.
      A “rainy day” fund is a terrible idea, as there is no clear definition of what constitutes a “rainy day.” Never has been. The Heritage Fund never had a clearly defined goal. Nor does Norway’s.
      Is the goal to replace personal taxation? is it to be used to build hospitals or schools? Is it to fund social programs? No one really knows. Should it pay an annual dividend back to citizens? Who would qualify? Again, there is no answer, because the supposedly bright Lougheed never looked that far ahead. The Norwegians are no better.

      • ” as there is no clear definition of what constitutes a “rainy day.”

        Bwawawawawawawawa……You’ve outdone yourself this time ,Flakes!