Canadian defence spending among lowest in NATO -

Canadian defence spending among lowest in NATO

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg says he expects members to increase military spending

Minister of National Defence Minister Harjit Singh Sajjan responds to a question during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, Feb. 16, 2016. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Minister of National Defence Minister Harjit Singh Sajjan responds to a question during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, Feb. 16, 2016. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

OTTAWA – The head of NATO threw down the gauntlet Monday, saying he expects all members to increase what they spend on their militaries even as a new report showed Canada lagging behind most of its allies.

Speaking in Brussels where he released his annual state-of-the-alliance report, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said it is incumbent on all members to spend two per cent of GDP on defence.

That is the target all NATO members, including Canada, agreed to work towards in 2014.

“All our efforts must be underpinned by adequate resources and fair burden-sharing,” Stoltenberg said.

“It is realistic that all allies should reach this goal. All allies have agreed to do it at the highest level. It can be done.”

Stoltenberg’s report said Canada saw a small bump in defence spending in 2016, which pushed the percentage of its GDP spent on defence to 1.02 from 0.98.

The increase helped Canada move up to 20th from 23rd in terms of spending among NATO’s 28 allies, putting it in a three-way tie with Hungary and Slovenia.

But it was still the smallest share of GDP that Canada has spent on defence since 2012, while only Belgium, the Czech Republic, Iceland, Luxembourg and Spain spent less.

The figures have taken on new importance following the election of U.S. President Donald Trump, who has complained about NATO allies not spending enough on defence.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau appeared to all but dismiss the two per cent target during a visit to Germany last month, saying: “There are many ways of evaluating one’s contribution to NATO.”

That is the message the government has repeatedly delivered, emphasizing Canada’s military contributions to Latvia, Ukraine and Iraq in lieu of large spending increases.

While Liberal insiders say Canada’s message has resonated in Washington, Stoltenberg was unwavering in his insistence that all allies meet the two per cent target.

At one point during Monday’s news conference, he listed the many ways that Spain has contributed to NATO operations and security, which includes contributing troops to a Canadian-led battle group in Latvia.

“Having said that, of course Spain, as many other allies, invests too little in defence,” Stoltenberg said.

“And that’s exactly why we decided in 2014 to stop the cuts, gradually increase, and move towards spending two per cent of GDP on defence. And I expect that Spain will deliver on that.”

A former prime minister of Norway, Stoltenberg acknowledged the difficult choices politicians must make when it comes to spending limited taxpayer dollars.

He said politicians prefer to spend on education, health and infrastructure and many countries cut defence spending as tensions eased in the wake of the Cold War.

“But my message is that if we are decreasing defence spending in times with reduced tensions, we have to be able to increase defence spending when tensions are going up and now tensions have gone up.”

Canada spends about $20 billion a year on defence and would need to double that to reach the NATO target.

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan recently revealed that he has ordered officials to look at how Canada calculates its defence spending compared with other NATO countries.

Only five NATO members currently spend two per cent of GDP on defence, though several have committed to reaching the target in the next few years.

Filed under:

Canadian defence spending among lowest in NATO

  1. If Canada really wanted to spend 2% of GDP on its military, the most obvious solution would be to pull out of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and develop our own ICBM. We could easily spend 20 billion on that, while giving a huge shot to our own aerospace industry instead of buying US weapons.

    In the end, by running the program under the military, we could develop a really nice heavy-lift rocket that would, in effect, be dual-use. We could then, like the US, turn it into a profit centre by launching satellites with it. How about that… meet that stupid 2% GDP NATO requirement and make some money while doing it.

    In short, take any unprofitable industry you want, label it a military expense, and you’re done. If we’re going to give money to Bombardier, let them make a cost-sucking military plane and get the NATO credit. Not like we’d be the first NATO country to do that. Lots of ways to fudge the numbers; lots of NATO examples of just that.

    But… pulling out of the non-proliferation treaty… that’s the best answer. “Canada should spend more on its military.” Okay, we’ll build a nuclear missile. “Um…, Umm…. well…. no, that’s OK, you spend enough. Bye.”

    Besides that, militarily, a Canadian made and controlled nuclear deterrent is the only way we could actually defend Canada from the one nation that could ever invade us, the US.