Charity distressed by flap over request for refund of Trudeau speaking fee -

Charity distressed by flap over request for refund of Trudeau speaking fee


OTTAWA – The New Brunswick charity that sparked a firestorm over Justin Trudeau’s public speaking fees says it’s “deeply distressed” that its attempt to get its money back has been turned into a political football.

The Saint John-based Grace Foundation issued its first public statement Thursday since the controversy erupted late last week, fuelled by local Conservative MP Rob Moore and Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s office.

“There was never any intention for this matter to become a political topic of discussion on the floor of the House of Commons,” says Ian Webster, chair of the foundation’s board.

“We are deeply distressed about many statements made from various persons,” he says, adding that the board is “most concerned” about remarks from Moore.

Moore has insisted he was asked by board members to put pressure on Trudeau to return the $20,000 fee he charged to headline a fundraising event in June 2012.

Last Friday, the Prime Minister’s Office circulated to reporters a letter in which foundation board member Susan Buck says the event was a “huge disappointment and financial loss for our organization” and asks Trudeau for a refund.

In Thursday’s statement, Webster says the “private letter” was sent in March to the Speakers’ Spotlight, the agency through which the foundation hired Trudeau. After receiving no response, he says the board decided in May to drop the matter.

“The board of directors did not authorize any member or agent to approach (Moore) or any political person on this matter.”

Moore, however, is standing by his version of events.

In an interview Thursday with radio station CHSJ in Saint John, Moore said the Grace Foundation gave him Buck’s letter.

“I was asked if I would try to exert pressure on Mr. Trudeau,” Moore insisted.

Asked by whom, he said: “Asked by members of the Grace Foundation.”

He declined to comment on Webster’s statement, saying he had not yet seen it.

Since the Buck’s letter surfaced, it has emerged that at least one board member has strong ties to the Conservative party and is married to a member of Moore’s riding executive.

The Conservatives have used the Grace Foundation’s request for a refund to turn the spotlight on the fact that Trudeau continued to collect fees on the public speaking circuit after becoming an MP in 2008.

Trudeau has voluntarily disclosed that he’s earned more than $1.3 million on the circuit since 2006, including $277,000 from 17 groups since he was first elected. Some of those groups are charities and non-profit entities such as school boards, municipalities and universities.

Trudeau, who stopped moonlighting as a paid public speaker last spring, announced on Sunday that he will give back the money to any of those 17 groups who feel they didn’t get their money’s worth.

But the debate has continued to rage, with Conservatives and New Democrats blasting Trudeau for accepting money from charitable organizations. They’ve argued that public speaking is part of an MPs’ job.

Thursday’s statement from the Grace Foundation concludes by expressing hope that “our correspondence this week with Mr. Trudeau will be helpful in clarifying the misunderstanding between Mr. Trudeau and ourselves.”

Webster declined further comment. Trudeau spokesperson Kate Monfette did not respond to question about the nature of that correspondence. She did say that the foundation’s statement does not change Trudeau’s intention of returning the speaking fee to any group that wants it.

Ironically, the Grace Foundation’s website still includes “news” posted a few days after the June 2012 inaugural fundraiser headlined by Trudeau.

“Guest speaker Justin Trudeau spoke passionately about our roles and responsibilities as Canadians in the global community, challenging each individual to consider his or her contribution toward positive change,” the posting says.

“Audience members agree it was an evening to remember.”

Filed under:

Charity distressed by flap over request for refund of Trudeau speaking fee

  1. Surprise—–the “deeply distressed“ Grace Foundation that stayed silent for over a week
    while the mud was flying speaks; and now we see the stories told by Grace Foundation, M.P Rob Moore, Judith Baxter,and The Prime Minister`s Office contradict each other!!!!

    Obviously some of these parties are better at mud throwing than truth telling!

    ——Will Grace Foundation seek the resignation of the board member(s) that don`t separate their partisan politics from the foundation`s charity work————

    • Again, I say: JT behaves like the piece of detritus he is, and the flaw is Harper’s. How sad.

  2. Moore lied…what a shocker!

    The Argument from the Tories / dippers is nonsense. The charities who wish to fundraise are free to approach whoever they wish in order to raise funds. Like him or not Trudeau is a big draw. The argument basically amounts to a top draw like Trudeau should speak for free, since no one is going to pay to see Moore speak, even if the rules permitted him to charge – which they don’t since he’s a cabinet member.
    At worst Trudeau is guilty of being greedy by charging top dollar in every case. Go ahead and change the rules, do you think you can compel Trudeau to speak outside of his riding merely because he’s in higher demand than most other MPs.


    Trudeau milked his political position to double his fees since 2006.

    He got a higher profile and media coverage as soon as he started actively seeking the Liberal nomination in his riding in 2007

    He milked this higher profile to DOUBLE HIS SPEAKING FEES.
    (Corruption is a disease and with all the corruption going on in Quebec perhaps this seemed okay)
    Certainly better than Mulroney’s brown paper bag of cash he conveniently forgot about.

    On top of charging taxpayer funded institutions a politically enhanced rate; Trudeau did so while being paid by the taxpayer.

    Did someone from the Prime Ministers Office HAVE to point this out?

    Where was the Media?

    • Quack quack quack!

    • Holy crap.. someone with more name recognition charged more for a speaking fee than someone without? Stop the presses people! Obviously this is corruption of the highest magnitude! 3.1 billion missing? Who cares? We’ve got a speaker here who’s demanding money for his services! How can this perfidy continue!

      • the cons thrive on bringing people down, it’s the only way to feel some superiority,