Government background check of Brazeau failed to spot tax address discrepancy - Macleans.ca
 

Government background check of Brazeau failed to spot tax address discrepancy


 

OTTAWA – An in-depth background check of Patrick Brazeau by senior officials in the Prime Minister’s Office either ignored or overlooked the conflicting addresses now at the heart of an RCMP probe into the embattled senator’s finances.

A court filing by the lead investigator in a breach-of-trust probe revealed last week that the Mounties are looking in greater depth into the tax returns filed by the former high-profile native leader between 2004 and 2008.

Brazeau was claiming aboriginal tax status at the time, and his driver’s licence and passport showed his address as his former father-in-law’s house on the Kiniw Zibi Mika First Nation reserve in Maniwaki, Que.

Police, however, allege he was actually living in Gatineau, about 90 minutes away, directly across the river from the national capital.

An official with the Privy Council Office, the bureaucratic wing of the prime minister’s office, confirmed that a detailed — but routine — background check was conducted on Brazeau at the time of his 2008 appointment, as is the case for all incoming senators.

That screening involves an RCMP criminal record check, an assessment by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, a review at Industry Canada to confirm no bankruptcy applications, and a Canada Revenue Agency tax compliance determination.

But the court records show the Gatineau address given to the Mounties for their portion of the review differs from the information on Brazeau’s Quebec driver’s licence, passport and tax returns.

Police have launched a separate investigation into Brazeau’s tax records, which indicate he claimed aboriginal tax credits between 2004 and 2008. That investigation is in addition to a breach-of-trust probe pertaining to Senate housing allowance claims, as well as an ongoing court case involving assault charges.

None of the allegations or charges have been proven in court.

Privy Council Office spokesman Raymond Rivet wouldn’t say whether officials flagged the address discrepancy, or even if they noticed it. Rivet declined to comment on the Brazeau case, citing it as “personal information.”

He did say the tax backgrounder “looks for significant non-compliance” and that the overall screening process, which has been in place since 1994, is instrumental.

“The background checks were instituted to assist the prime minister in ensuring that there are no criminal, security or other concerns that could affect the suitability of candidates for certain public office positions such as the Senate,” Rivet said in an email.

A spokeswoman for Brazeau, Debby Simms, declined to comment because of the ongoing investigations.

NDP ethics critic Charlie Angus, however, accused the Conservatives of wilfully turning a blind eye to the contradictions and red flags that were raised prior to Brazeau’s appointment to the Senate.

“If the Privy Council was looking at his tax records, you would have thought they would have spotted these discrepancies,” he said.

“When the story started to break, you have to ask yourself whether they took another look, and was the prime minister aware his addresses didn’t match?”

Either government officials botched the background check, or the contradiction was buried because the Conservatives wanted to be seen with a high-profile native leader on their team, Angus said.

“Either we’re looking at a prime minister who chose to ignore the red flags, or the Privy Council wasn’t all that competent in doing the review,” he said.

“I find it hard to believe the Privy Council is incompetent.”

The RCMP is also investigating senators Mike Duffy and Mac Harb — the first a former Conservative, the latter a former Liberal — on breach of trust allegations in connection with their disallowed Senate expense claims.

An independent audit of expense claims filed by Sen. Pamela Wallin, another former Conservative, has been finalized and is expected to be released next week.


 

Government background check of Brazeau failed to spot tax address discrepancy

  1. So more tax evasion. You know it was overlooked. This information is trivial to get on a government background check.

    Just more Ottawa corruption and waste that you and I are forced to pay for. I say forced as where on my rigged ballot do I have a credible option of less governemtn, less taxes and less waste?

    Ya, I have 3 options with the same results. More government, more taxes, and less for the working middle class productive people. Too many consumptive paracites in our wallets these days.

    Our democracy is a ruse when we can’t get better choices on the rigged ballot. And while Harper says he is for justice, how come CRA isn’t taking these criminals to court no mater which party does it? After all, we have seen multiple parties do this, and they all are still party members even. Still collecting wages, benefits, pension time and all.

    Because Ottawa, politics is about getting your money and not doing much for us in return. Just like Greece, driving the country down the debt hole of disrepair.

    And no good chices on the ballot, as CBC and managed media only want statism.

  2. This is doubly worse because there is no such reserve as Kiniw Zibi
    Mika, at Maniwaki, or anywhere else in the world for that matter. So putting a
    fictitious first nation on your driver’s license, passport and tax
    return is really really bad. What’s worse is that Passport Canada, CRA
    or the Quebec motor vehicle authorities wouldn’t pick up on that.

    • Especially if the person is a politician. Heck, we have 450,000 civil servants out of Ottawa and they supposedly don’t catch it? Only two scenarios for this, first is they do nothing for their wages but kill time, second is that they knew and ignored the corruption. In either case, taxpayers should be angry.