3

Patrick Brown reverses position on sex-ed changes

Last week, Patrick Brown said he would scrap changes to sex ed curriculum. Now, he’s saying the opposite.


 
Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown delivers a speech at the Ontario Progressive Conservative convention in Ottawa, Saturday, March 5, 2016. (Fred Chartrand/CP)

Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown delivers a speech at the Ontario Progressive Conservative convention in Ottawa, Saturday, March 5, 2016. (Fred Chartrand/CP)

TORONTO – Ontario’s Progressive Conservative leader now says it was a mistake to pledge to scrap the Liberal government’s sex-ed curriculum if his party wins the 2018 election.

In a letter distributed last week, just days before a byelection in the east Toronto riding of Scarborough-Rouge River, Patrick Brown wrote that a Progressive Conservative government would “scrap the controversial changes to sex ed.”

The curriculum was updated last year, for the first time since 1998, but some parents complained that the government didn’t consult them enough and others were angered by mentions of same-sex relationships, gender identity and masturbation.

In an op-ed published by the Toronto Star, Brown writes that the Scarborough-Rouge River campaign letter went “too far” in saying he would scrap the curriculum because he will not.

The curriculum changes are “hot topics” in the riding, Brown says, and that while parents should be consulted, it doesn’t mean “opening the door to intolerance.”

“It is important to have sex education to combat homophobia, and raise important issues like consent, mental health, bullying, and gender identity,” Brown writes.

“I want to correct the record before the byelection on Thursday, whatever the political consequences. I do not want people voting in Scarborough-Rouge River thinking I will scrap sex education. I will not.”

A statement released Monday by Institute for Canadian Values president Charles McVety suggests Brown may have indeed lost the social Conservative vote.

“Patrick Brown campaigned to become leader on a pro-family platform, promising to protect children from the radical sex education curriculum of Kathleen Wynne,” McVety wrote.

“It is always sad to see a politician be deceitful, but it is especially troubling when he is so brazen the he will flip three times on the same issue. We have been used, deceived and betrayed.”

Brown’s spokeswoman tweeted Friday that the letter was not a new announcement. Brown himself tweeted late that night that he “strongly” supports an updated curriculum “that takes into account changing attitudes and (the) world in which children now dwell” and said parents must be consulted, but didn’t dispute that he planned to scrap the Liberal curriculum.

During the party’s leadership race last year, Brown spoke at a rally protesting the sex-ed curriculum, saying, “Teachers should teach facts about sex education, not values,” without identifying what parts of the curriculum he felt were teaching values.

The Liberals have alternately accused Brown of harbouring extreme social Conservative views and tried to paint him as “an old-style politician who just says whatever he thinks people want to hear.”


 

Patrick Brown reverses position on sex-ed changes

  1. UUUUUUU-turn

    Another Hudak, Tory etc…..

    • Can’t speak for Hudak or Tory, but in this instance, the first U turn to lure out the trolls and he 2nd U turn to shake the parasites off on the trolls is an effective communication clarification strategy. Staying tuned.

  2. The some kind of subset exercise from the recent Tory warrior seminar? This is the dubble-down, volte-face from the Windsor ‘true blue’ political partisan-training echelon – “yer get yer rank ‘n file all primed-up about the preversion of the little tykes. Have em all ready to ride the lawnmowers all the way to Liberalville. then what you do is rip the carpet up from underneath them. Teaches them good balance, landing on there feat running, or how to rise gracefully after a nasty spill.

    The Preemeer has nothing to worry about.

Sign in to comment.