5 global icons to watch in 2014

Glenn Greenwald starts a new journalism venture and Hillary Clinton mulls a run for prez

From a soccer star to the UN’s top nuclear cop, the fate of global events is in the hands of these five changemakers.

Neymar (Jung Yeon-Je/AFP/Getty Images)

1. Neymar

He isn’t just the biggest celebrity in Brazil, he’s the best player for the greatest soccer nation in history. But when his country hosts the 2014 World Cup, there’s more than a trophy at stake. Brazil has already seen violent protests against the billions in public dollars spent on the World Cup. Some Brazilians are begging tourists on social media: “Don’t come.” But winning has its way of changing opinions. If Neymar helps Brazil become world champion, he will be a national hero. Anything less and his country will be in a state of mourning. No pressure—especially for a 21-year-old.

2. Hillary Clinton

The former secretary of state has told advisers that she will decide in the coming year whether to run once again for the White House. Polls suggest she is the favourite to win the Democratic nomination. Since stepping down from her cabinet job, the former first lady has been working with her family’s charitable foundation. But a campaign is under way. The ostensibly independent Ready for Hillary political action committee raised $1.2 million in the first half of 2013. Alongside the campaign-style T-shirts, it was selling Hillary 2016 champagne glasses—until they sold out.

Gen. Sisi (Reuters)

3. Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Sisi

If Egypt is to salvage anything from the uprising that pushed dictator Hosni Mubarak from power three years ago and galvanized the Arab Spring, much will depend on the man now effectively running the country. As chief of the armed forces, Sisi led the military coup last summer that unseated Mubarak’s elected successor, the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi. While wildly popular among those who felt Morsi was trying to Islamize Egypt, the suppression of the Muslim Brotherhood was bloody and the interim government has shown limited tolerance for dissent. Elections are planned for 2014 and Sisi is expected to run for president.

4. Glenn Greenwald

The reporter who first broke the U.S. spying story isn’t as well known as his source, Edward Snowden. But that could soon change. The Guardian writer announced in October that he’s starting a new investigative media venture. It has already received $250 million in funding from tech billionaire Pierre Omidyar. Details are scant, but Greenwald has said he has more to reveal from Snowden’s documents. The whole truth about government surveillance is out there, and Greenwald’s as-yet-unnamed site will be the place to find it.

5. Yukiya Amano

The fate of America’s diplomatic gamble to embrace Iran and curb its nuclear ambitions now hinges on the work of the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Amano will oversee nuclear inspections and decide if Iran is playing by the new rules. So far, concerns he’s raised about his budget don’t bode well for the work ahead. He will also be trying to monitor North Korea, where a reactor appeared to be restarted in November. The odds are long that he can corral these rogue nations—and the stakes couldn’t be higher.




Browse

5 global icons to watch in 2014

  1. Ah, the self important arrogance of Hilary. Given her foeign policy mess ups, and both Clinton have now had leaks (Wiki and Monica) I would say they are done for. Add in Obamanation of debt issues continue, any determined opposition could easily win against Hilary.

    Besides, Hilary isn’t from Harvard or the mason back room.

    USA wants war, and I expect media control and propaganda to step up. In 2013 we saw a lot of biased, incomplete and inaccurate reporting as if media is managing us. Trying to sell another useless war on Syria/Iran Shia when we support 9/11 like Sunni terrorists is well, a leap of logic no one in media has the guts to call Obama on.

    Hey, Iran only has 200 kg of reactor grade, yet Pakistan has 110 working bombs, makes more and has tones of bomb grade material. And Pakistan is not a stable country. If nuclear risk means so much, why is Pakistan not the target? Oh wait, they are al Queda/Sunni backed…..same as 9/11.

    Fact is the logic just does smell right, other than to say USA wants war as so much of their economy depends on blowing people up. USA debt-spends a trillion on NSA/CIA/military which is more than the other top 25 nations combined, as if at war with the world.

    We don’t like you and want your oil and your banks to hoard USD, so if you do not bow to US they will bomb you or support conflict terrorism to keep you busy,

    Like 1930s, we are closer to war than we think, a war the corrupt politicians want to cover up the monetary and debt corruption of our own governments.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *