8

Canada to send 450 troops, armoured vehicles to Latvia for NATO force

Large enough force to make Russia take a second look before taking any aggressive action, says Chief of Defence Staff


 

WARSAW, Poland – Canada is sending hundreds of troops to Latvia for the long haul.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced at the NATO leaders’ summit in Poland on Friday that Canada will take command of a 1,000-strong multinational force in Latvia, as the alliance beefs up its presence in the Baltics and Poland in response to recent Russian actions.

Speaking on the sidelines of the summit, defence chief Gen. Jonathan Vance revealed that Canada will send about 450 soldiers along with armoured vehicles to the Baltic state as part of an “enduring” NATO presence in Eastern Europe.

The Canadians will form the “nucleus” of a battle group in Latvia, Vance said, that with the addition of forces from other allies, is expected to grow to about 1,000 troops. Germany, the United States and Britain are leading similar forces in Lithuania, Poland and Estonia.

Allies are expected to begin announcing contributions at a conference next week, while officials indicated the first Canadian troops could begin arriving in Latvia early next year.

Vance said he couldn’t say how long they would stay. But NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg “has been clear this is an open-ended commitment,” Vance pointed out. “And so Canada has committed to that. We’ll take it as it comes. But it is intended to be enduring.”

Latvia’s foreign affairs minister predicted an extended stay in his country for the Canadians. In an exclusive interview with The Canadian Press, Edgars Rinkevics said: “My answer on how long is a very simple one: As long as necessary.

“Frankly, with that rhetoric in Moscow,” he added, “I don’t believe, and I’m not as optimistic as some of my colleagues, that we are going to see this happening soon. I think that we are in this situation for quite a long time.”

There have been fears NATO and Russia are on the brink of a new Cold War, if they aren’t already in one. The lack of any clear timetable for when Canadian troops will come home from Eastern Europe may well add to those comparisons.

In addition to the troops, Canada will deploy up to six CF-18s to Europe on an occasional basis to help patrol allied airspace. It will also continue sending naval frigates to the region, as it has done since April 2014.

The combined efforts will bring the number of Canadian military personnel in Eastern Europe at any given time up to a maximum of 800, which the government says is Canada’s largest sustained military deployment to the continent in over a decade.

Appearing with Vance, Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan pushed back on the Cold War comparisons.

“This is about sending a right message of cohesion within NATO, giving confidence to member states, and showing how important deterrence is so we can get back to a responsible dialogue,” he said.

Speaking to reporters earlier in the day, Stoltenberg said alliance members “don’t want a new Cold War. The Cold War is history and it should remain history.”

However, the NATO chief also said the world has seen a more assertive Russia that is willing to use military force, as exemplified by its annexations of Crimea and support for separatists in Ukraine. He said that is why the deployment of allied forces into Eastern Europe is necessary.

“They will send a clear message that an attack on one ally will be an attack on the whole alliance,” Stoltenberg said. “I believe this approach, with defence and dialogue, is the only viable long-term approach to Russia.”

Eastern Europe allies had been asking NATO to bolster its presence in the region as a deterrent against Russia trying to destabilize them in the same way it did in Ukraine. That includes crossing into their territory, inciting Russian speakers within their borders and cyber attacks.

Russia has denied any such intentions, and instead has accused NATO of instigating the current standoff by expanding into former Soviet territory and trying to undermine its sphere of influence. It has also warned against any military build-up on its borders.

As Trudeau and the other alliance heads of state and government were gathering in the Polish capital, a spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin said Moscow is willing to co-operate with NATO, even though he said the alliance is treating Russia like an enemy.

Russia “has always been open for dialogue” with NATO, especially to fight what it sees as a “genuine threat” – terrorism, Dmitry Peskov said.

“Russia is not looking (for an enemy) but it actually sees it happening,” Peskov told reporters in Moscow. “When NATO soldiers march along our border and NATO jets fly by, it’s not us who are moving closer to the NATO borders.”

With files from the Associated Press


 
Filed under:

Canada to send 450 troops, armoured vehicles to Latvia for NATO force

  1. I don’t think Russia has intentions to do anything to anyone in the Baltics or Poland and this is just another attempt by NATO to keep it’s cash flow coming but….

    “That’s not large enough to threaten Russia, Vance says, but enough to make it take a second look before taking any aggressive action.” Wasn’t that the idea behind Hong Kong in 1941?

    The message seems to be that the Balts and Poles won’t trust NATO to come to the rescue unless NATO troops are killed.

    • There is no similarity between the Baltic States and Hong Kong. The latter took place with a ‘handover’ agreement. Without such an agreement, Hong Kong would probably remain status quo … and Vancouver house prices would be less extraordinary.

  2. Slowly Trudeau has shown his colours — as another Nato warlord rather than restore Canada’s tradition role as a UN blue helmet peacekeeping force. Shame.

    • Canada has peacekeeping troops deployed in a few places at the moment but, remember, they can only deploy where ‘peace’ exists already.

      Cartoonists would have a ‘field day’ if blue helmets appeared in Ukraine or Syria. The comedian Eddie Izard’s skit on such an event would be fantastic.

  3. Better to deploy within NATO, rather than waste time and lives trying to support casual friends in the Middle East.

  4. For the record Canada has ~ 1400 troops in Joint Personnel Support Units (holding units for those about to medically released) than planned for Eastern Europe. This is another case of tokenism designed to keep DND busy enough to justify itself and to provide a seat at the table (really a trip to Europe and some media coverage) for pols. More tax dollars down the drain.

  5. This is a farce. The smallest element that rates consideration on a major battlefield is a battalion. The more cohesive a military force is the better. We’re sending half of a battalion but don’t worry the other half will be a gaggle of Portuguese, Greeks or Dutch. Gives you confidence doesn’t it? Different languages. Different vehicles and weapons. Different voltages and encryption (if any) for radios. The right to call home for “clarification” of any orders you don’t like. The rest of the “brigade” is spread over four countries. This nonsensical ad hoc mess might be OK for peacekeeping but it would fall apart instantaneously in a war with Russia.

    Hopefully Sajjan and Vance know this. I don’t expect Trudeau to know anything so 1) does the gov’t actually believe in the Russian threat? 2) if it does why would it join in such a farce. 3) if it does and still sends this token force why are we paying for Sajjan or Vance.

Sign in to comment.