2

Scotland votes: What was vs. what might be

Paul Wells reports from Scotland that nobody has any clue what’s going to happen.


 
'Yes' campaigner Bobby Doherty in Glasgow on Sunday. (Andrew Milligan, AP Photo)

‘Yes’ campaigner Bobby Doherty in Glasgow on Sunday. (Andrew Milligan, AP Photo)

If you wanted to attend a league-sanctioned Better Together event today in Edinburgh — Better Together being the official name of the committee opposed to Scotland’s separation from the United Kingdom — you had your pick between the John Reid event and the Alistair Darling event. John Reid held seven portfolios in seven years while Tony Blair was prime minister. Darling was minister for this and that under Blair, but his heyday came when he served later as Gordon Brown’s Chancellor of the Exchequer, succeeding Brown in that position.

Both men have accomplished more than most of us ever will, but it’s strictly accurate to call them has-beens. I chose the Reid event, based entirely on incorrectly believing he once slugged a protester. That was John Prescott, I learned later. The guy threw an egg at Prescott and he popped him hard on the snoot. The Daily Telegraph hired a boxing analyst, who wrote that it was the best left jab he’d ever seen. But that’s neither here nor there. Reid, who apparently has not punched anybody in public, was scrappy and funny as he laid out the case against secession for a tony No audience — lots of chinos and pink shirts — in a west-end Edinburgh hotel.

If you wanted to attend a league-sanctioned Yes Scotland event in Edinburgh today, there was only one and it’s still under way as I write this: a Concert for Scotland at Usher Hall, the city’s main plush-seat concert venue, featuring musical acts Franz Ferdinand, Mogwai, Frightened Rabbit, Amy Macdonald, McIntosh Ross and Stanley Odd. None of them served in any Tony Blair cabinet, and the audience for tonight’s Yes event was 30 times larger and, at the average, one-third as old as at Reid’s No event.

Related reading: 

Video: Scotland’s freedom fighters 

Scottish referendum: Panicky in the U.K. 

Disunited Kingdom: Scotland’s separatists cling to hope

It’s not a perfectly fair comparison — there have been dozens, hundreds of events, organized by both campaigns or spontaneous, since the campaign leading to Thursday’s vote on Scottish independence began. Each side has drawn huge crowds and disappointing crowds, and each is supported by a broad coalition of voters across all demographics. But there was real symbolism in the appeals each campaign made today.

Reid and Prescott — along with Gordon Brown, the Scot who helped build New Labour as Tony Blair’s lieutenant and then helped dismantle it as his successor — have been among the No side’s most visible campaigners. They are proof that Scots can matter in the corridors of power at Westminster. Or rather, proof they once could. I mean, they’re gentlemen of a certain age these days. As Yes Scotland is fond of pointing out, the Conservatives are in power and Scotland has more pandas than Conservative MPs (the ratio is 2:1).

The No camp’s tactics are well founded. Labour voters have been tempted to vote Yes; the Tony Blair All-Stars are on the field to call them home, and to remind them that Scotland has won a lot through membership in the U.K. (the positive message) and that it has a lot to lose (the threatening message, often delivered in so many words). It’s a measure of David Cameron’s flexibility and pragmatism that he’s letting his adversaries carry the message. (Cameron has visited Scotland in this campaign but not taken any kind of lead role.) It’s also a ghost image of the way a Quebec referendum would have played out if one had happened while Stephen Harper was PM: he’d maintain legal authority but let others, including, one feels certain, Justin Trudeau and Thomas Mulcair, take the rhetorical lead.

But of course if you’re defending the status quo, it’s preferable for the status quo to be something you like to show off. The Yes and No campaigns are not diametrically opposed in style — you can’t shorthand them as Hope vs. Fear, because the Yes has been braying all week about the Westminster government’s supposed “plan” to privatize the National Health Service, so there’s plenty of fear in their rhetorical arsenal as well. But perhaps you could line it up this way: the Yes is about possibility, the No about prudence. Darling, Reid and Brown urge Scots to protect the gains they’ve made. Alex Salmond and Franz Ferdinand want them to dream about what’s possible. And, frankly, not to sweat the details.

I offer no predictions. The polls are close. I haven’t seen much of the country since I got here Friday, and this exercise is so unprecedented nobody knows how to predict. At dinner tonight, everybody around me was talking about voting No, except the young guy at the next table who was impressing his date by gaming out the negotiations around an independent Scotland’s accession to NATO. Nobody has any clue what’s going to happen.


 

Scotland votes: What was vs. what might be

  1. I’d vote yes, but I doubt the Scots will.

  2. I was born there and got whisked away to England within a year or two of popping into the world, been back for the obligatory couple ‘o months of back packing through the highlands when i was around 20 or so.[ if you have the time, the weather is fine and it’s still there, take the train out to Mallaig. Go by Rhum or better yet fly over the Hebrides at this time of the year…or maybe take a walk on the finest shell sand beaches in Europe on Harris or any of the wast facing outer islands. It wont take you long to realize why they might want to be independent.
    Still, can’t say i’m unhappy sorta expats like me have no vote. My heart would be saying yes and my head no at least twice a day. As for the politics – i guess there must be more social Democrats in a square mile of anywhere in Scotland than in the whole of England. But ought you to cut your throat cuz you hate the English…maybe join the end of the line, it’s long enough.
    I wouldn’t have tried to use fear to sell no personally. A better approach might have been: I know we’ve been an asshole toward you now for at least a century or 3; and yes you would do pretty good on your own with out us sucking the life blood out of you – but look how far we’ve come together despite our differences…you complete me…yadda yadda…that sorta thing. Worth a try, or maybe they’d just have said:”Screw yu Jimmy!” anyway? ” Whut have ye dun fer us lately?Whut du ye have we naid? Nuthin’!” Poor old England, can’t even use the Canadian fallback :QC is better off inside a strong Canada than outside in a sea of English North America. Economies of scale – that’s all UK has to offer. Which, combined with a more flexible union, will quite likely be enough if i know my canny country men at all. Or, maybe they really do mean it this time?

Sign in to comment.