The Taser debate, Down Under -

The Taser debate, Down Under

A video of police tasering an Aboriginal man 13 times has led to outrage, and demands for an inquiry

The Taser debate, Down Under

After the images of Spratt were released, the premier called the incident ‘excessive’; Corruption and Crime Commission/ Richard Hatherly/Newspix

The video is chilling. Police in Western Australia surround a man writhing and screaming on the floor of a police station after being repeatedly tasered for refusing to comply with a strip search. “Do you want to go again?” one asks. Moments later the Aboriginal man, Kevin Spratt, is tasered again. And again. In total, two officers tasered him 13 times, while nine cops watched. The 2008 incident is only coming to attention after video of it was released last week by the state’s Corruption and Crime Commission (CCC) as part of a report into the use of Tasers by police. The reaction was horror. “That particular incident was wrong,” said Western Australia’s acting police commissioner, Chris Dawson. “Clearly, in my view, the officers overreacted.” Premier Colin Barnett echoed the sentiment: “It was excessive use of a Taser that could not be justified.”

And like the video of four RCMP officers confronting Robert Dziekanski—who died after being tasered—at Vancouver’s airport in 2007, this Australian footage, along with the report, has sparked a debate about how Tasers are used. The weapons, which disable a person with up to 50,000 volts of electricity, were introduced in Western Australia in 2007 to prevent injury. Now they account for 65 per cent of reported “uses of force.” (The use of pepper spray, another option, decreased significantly, while the use of firearms has doubled.) And Tasers are being used not to prevent injury, as intended, but to enforce compliance with police orders, especially against Aboriginals and the mentally ill.

Now the Australian Council for Civil Liberties wants a national inquest into use of the Taser. They could look to Canada for help. In June, after an exhaustive inquiry into the Dziekanski death, retired justice Thomas Braidwood concluded in June that “the five deployments of the Taser and the physical struggle with the four RCMP officers contributed substantially to Mr. Dziekanski’s death.” He also blasted the officers for their “shameful conduct.” Earlier he urged police to restrict the use of Tasers until their safety was studied.

As for the two Australian police officers who tasered Spratt, they were fined $750 and $1,200 respectively for using the weapon “for compliance rather than to prevent injury.” Police say criminal charges weren’t considered because Spratt didn’t ask for them. Spratt, now out of custody, is outraged: “I have been tortured in police custody and the police are trying to put a further injustice upon me by blaming me for the failure to prosecute the officers.” The attorney general has called for a review of disciplinary procedures.


The Taser debate, Down Under

  1. Canadians should take note that two of the leading blogs covering the taser problems are both Canadian. The ‘Truth Not Tasers’ blog and the ‘’ blog (don’t forget the dash) have covered all the news and have also connected some of the dots that link Taser International directly to those that promote excited delirium as a handy-dandy evidence-free excuse for taser deaths.

  2. “…while the use of firearms has doubled. And Tasers are being used not to prevent injury, as intended, but to enforce compliance with police orders…”

    The above quoted facts reveal that the justifications for tasers, both historical and on-going, are based on lies wrapped in deception. The. increase in use of firearms that accompanies introduction of tasers has also been confirmed in the USA. And tasers are used to replace much lower, and much safer (with respect to DEATH) forms of force

    No other police weapon has been accompanied with so much outright deception and lies.

  3. So it seems that the police act like children.

    If they use tasers to enforce their regulation that is a very clear indication that the core of the problem is the officers. I guess you have to treat them like children and force them to file reports everytime they use their taser, just like a real gun.

    For crying out loud, way to make law enforcement look simply retarded!