3

Under par: Why a men-only club culture still persists in the U.K.

Prestigious golf courses and many of London’s ‘gentlemen’s clubs’ alike continue to reject gender equality


 
Angel Cabrera of Argentina hits out of a bunker on the 18th hole during the third round of the British Open golf Championship at Muirfield in Scotland July 20, 2013. (Russell Cheyne/Reuters)

Angel Cabrera of Argentina hits out of a bunker on the 18th hole during the third round of the British Open golf Championship at Muirfield in Scotland July 20, 2013. (Russell Cheyne/Reuters)

Muirfield Golf Club in East Lothian, Scotland, is one of the finest courses in the world and arguably the best in the United Kingdom. But it will not be hosting another British Open anytime soon, having been dropped from the Open’s official roster following a membership vote on May 20 to maintain its historic policy of barring female members.

The controversial decision, which Scotland’s female First Minister Nicola Sturgeon described as “simply indefensible,” came as the result of an extended two-year consultation process in which a two-thirds majority of membership vote was needed for the motion for gender equality to be successful. In the end, of the 616 members who voted, only 64 per cent were in favour, causing the motion to fail by a slender margin of three per cent.

Across the U.K., it’s been perceived as an embarrassing setback for the club, which was harshly criticized in the British media following the announcement. The British golfer Rory McIlroy, currently ranked No. 3 in the world, urged the club to “see sense,” adding that “it’s more of a loss to Muirfield than it is to us.” Prime Minister David Cameron chimed in to condemn the decision, adding that he fully supports the decision by the Royal and Ancient Golf Club at St Andrews (the British governing body that determines the rules of golf) to ban Muirfield from hosting the Open. The R&A has recently stated that it would not stage the Open “at a venue that does not admit women as members.”

Related: The end of golf in Canada

While golf is a notoriously conservative sport, Muirfield is bucking the general trend in its decision to remain men-only. Royal St. George’s, a course in Kent, allowed in female members last year, while the Royal and Ancient Golf Club at St Andrews only lifted its ban against women members on its own course in 2014. For many of these clubs, a change in policy is a major break with tradition. In the case of the R&A, no full-fledged female member had played the course in the entirety of the club’s 262-year history.

But increased gender equality on the green hasn’t necessarily translated to social change in the more traditional supper clubs of London. The Garrick Club, one of London’s most exclusive social clubs located in the city’s theatre district (and known for its celebrated membership list, which includes the broadcaster Jeremy Paxman and the politician Michael Gove) voted down a motion to include women members by a comfortable majority last summer. And a similar fracas occurred at the venerable and storied Traveller’s Club —a haven for accomplished ambassadors and explorers—when a majority of voting members declined to let in women last year.

In St. James’s, an area near Buckingham Palace, historied clubs like Brook’s, White’s and Boodles—the settings for many a scene in the novels of P.G. Wodehouse and Evelyn Waugh—would sooner allow dogs and cats on the membership roster than humans lacking Y chromosomes. While most of these clubs allow women in as guests (often only during certain hours or in certain areas) others are more hard and fast in their discrimination. At White’s, where David Cameron’s father was a former chairman, the only woman officially allowed past the front door is the Queen.

While it does not look like the rules are set to be changed at most London gentleman’s clubs anytime soon, the issue happily refuses to die. In 2011, the actress Joanna Lumley was nominated to the Garrick Club by her friend, the actor Hugh Bonneville. She was not accepted, obviously, and an angry member is said to have ripped the page containing her name from the ledger and tossed it away. “A small gang of diehards wrote some nasty things beneath the nomination—which was really rather ungentlemanly,” one member recounted to the Guardian after the club’s recent vote on the issue.

In 2014, Anthony Layden, former British ambassador to Libya and Morocco and then chairman of the Travellers Club, produced an 8,000-word paper on the subject of whether to allow in female members after extended consultation with existing members. Reading over the paper —which was obtained and reprinted in its entirety by the London Evening Standard—an unsurprising perspective emerges. It turns out many members of men-only gentlemen’s clubs support the ban on female members because (shocker!) they dislike the company of women. “That a chap can ‘take sanctuary’ in the Smoking Room or Bar is one of the club’s charms, and it would make it a less attractive and distinctly different club should it admit lady members,” said one anonymous member in the report. Another later added: “My experience of the club table at the Oxford and Cambridge Club, where one does unfortunately encounter lady members, is that their presence leads to very different and far less enjoyable themes of conversation.”

While Britain’s Equality Act criminalizes discrimination against women on the basis of gender, private clubs and associations are exempt under the law. The only question left now is whether these dens of inequality will change their policies before their rapidly aging membership renders them extinct.


 

Under par: Why a men-only club culture still persists in the U.K.

  1. It is surprising that this piece was not checked for accuracy. The members of the Garrick Club did not vote down a motion to include women members by a comfortable majority last summer. A majority voted in favour. The motion failed because a two-thirds majority of members voting is required to change the rules.

    Since the page proposing (not “nominating”) Joanna Lumley was removed from the ledger, it seems unlikely that the person quoted in the Guardian had any knowledge of whether anything else had been written on it.

    At the Garrick, women guests can go to all parts of the club that male guests can go, even the men’s’ lavatories. Few do, however.

    The notion that members of other clubs would sooner have cats and dogs as members rather than women is fanciful. Indeed, it is fictional.

    On reading this piece, one also wonders what happens to ambassadors who are not “accomplished”. Does your correspondent think they cannot join the Traveller’s? Why did she deploy the adjective?

    • I wonder if the men’s lavatories have seats that lift up.

  2. There are women-only clubs, organizations, etc. When will they throw open their doors?

    While I can’t really see myself joining a group that restricts itself to members of one gender, I see no reason to force such places to open their doors to the other gender. Those of us who want to socialize across genders will simply go elsewhere.

    Unless they are actively engaged in some kind of gender warfare – let them be. They will die out soon enough.

Sign in to comment.