A small step toward committee reform (maybe)

The House votes to pursue the election of committee chairs

By a count of 275-0 last night the House of Commons passed a motion from Conservative MP Brad Trost that instructs the Procedure and House Affairs committee to consider the election of committee chairs via a preferential ballot vote of the House.

In asking for the House’s support, Mr. Trost appealed to the British example of the Wright committee‘s reforms. Those reforms to the select committee system went one step further—electing not just committee chairs, but also, via party caucuses, the membership of select committees. Three years later, the sense was that the changes had helped create more confident and credible committees. (Here is a study which suggests media coverage of British committees has markedly increased since the reforms.)

During debate in the House, Liberal MP Scott Brison suggested the parliamentary secretaries be prevented from sitting on committees. That was among the recommendations of the McGrath committee (which also suggested that committee members be responsible for finding their own alternates).

All of which have the conceivable impact of providing committees and committee members a certain amount of independence from the whips and the executive.

See previously: A small step toward e-petitions (maybe)




Browse

A small step toward committee reform (maybe)

  1. So what’s to stop the executive from cracking the whip to ensure their caucus votes for the preferred candidates? Is this to be a secret ballot?

    • Since it’s only been referred to a committee, we don’t know what (if anything) will be proposed here. In the UK, yes, it’s a secret ballot using the Alternative Vote – meaning they have to rank the candidates for each chair position in order of preference.

  2. Just another fine example of how evil Stephen Harper and the CPC are. Can’t you smell the Sulfur?

    • And here I thought it was your fart I was smelling…

  3. Pingback: What would an agenda for parliamentary reform look like? - Macleans.ca

  4. Pingback: One person who wasn't offended by Robert Goguen's questions - Macleans.ca

  5. Pingback: The Backbench Spring continues - Macleans.ca

Sign in to comment.