Newsmakers of 2013: Edward Snowden -

Newsmakers of 2013: Edward Snowden

He has been called a patriot and a traitor. To Obama, he’s a diplomatic ticking time bomb.


AFPTV/AFP/Getty Images; Andel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

He spilled some of the most tightly held security secrets in U.S. history, and then fled to Russia, where he remains a fugitive. His disclosures about the breadth and depth of the Obama administration’s high-tech spying—not only against suspected terrorists, but its own citizens, and even close allies around the globe—have led to a continuous drip of embarrassing diplomatic incidents abroad and outrage at home. Edward Snowden, a lanky 30-year-old computer systems administrator, appalled by the sweeping surveillance of phone calls and Internet activities he witnessed as a contractor for the National Security Agency, downloaded tens of thousands of internal NSA documents and became a whistleblower on an epic scale.

And it’s not over yet.

The first leak, published by the Guardian newspaper in June, showed that the U.S. government was systematically collecting records of all Americans’ phone calls—not just those suspected of a crime. A day later, another leak published almost simultaneously in the Washington Post and the Guardian, revealed a secret NSA program called PRISM that allowed the U.S. government to collect emails and other communications from Gmail, Yahoo!, Hotmail and other major American-based cloud providers. The next day saw the publication of another top-secret document in which President Barack Obama laid out the country’s cyberwarfare policies, including targets to strike abroad if he gave the order. It was clear that someone with high-level access to a trove of America’s most sensitive secrets had decided to do something extraordinary.

The disclosures would continue throughout the summer and into the fall. But the anonymity of the source was soon lifted. In a video interview conducted by Guardian columnist Glenn Greenwald and filmed by the independent documentarian Laura Poitras, Snowden revealed himself as the person who had flung the NSA’s secrets into the world. A one-time Obama supporter who had grown disillusioned with the President’s policies, he was waging his exposure campaign from a hotel room in Hong Kong. The U.S. promptly revoked his passport, and he flew to Moscow where he remained in legal limbo at the airport for weeks until he was granted temporary asylum on the condition, imposed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, that he do no more harm to the United States. By then, however, he had already handed over huge archives of documents to Greenwald, Poitras and the Washington Post’s Barton Gellman, who have been dripping them out and show no signs of being finished.

Snowden has been praised as a whistleblower and patriot, and condemned as a traitor. His disclosures sparked a debate over privacy and transparency in the U.S. and revealed hitherto unpublicized interpretations of the PATRIOT Act. The outcry that accompanied his leaks led to bipartisan calls for reforms to the surveillance practices that had grown since 9/11, with some demanding investigations in the style of the Church committee that followed the Watergate scandal and led to extensive reining in of intelligence services. His leaks also fuelled a debate over whether the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court put in place to oversee surveillance requests had become little more than a rubber stamp. President Obama responded defensively, calling some of the reporting about the documents misleading and convening a commission to examine whether the administration can better balance national security and civil liberties in its data-gathering activities. Meanwhile, Congress is weighing legislative proposals to curtail some of the NSA’s activities, at least on American soil.

The leaks had repercussions beyond Washington. The disclosures put a spotlight on co-operation by firms that provide Internet communications services to the world and led to a diplomatic row with Europe over wiretapping abroad, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cellphone. The leaks set off a national and global debate about the voracious American national surveillance state—along with its “five eyes” partners of Canada, the U.K., Australia and New Zealand—and the ethos that if the U.S. has the technical capability to spy, at least abroad, it will do so. The issue remains whether the rules of spying have changed or should change with the amazing growth of computing and surveillance power.

The initial months of Snowden’s drama played out against the backdrop of the trial of the other mass leaker, Chelsea Manning, formerly known as Private Bradley Manning, who was convicted of violating the Espionage Act and sentenced in August to serve 35 years in a U.S. prison. So far, Snowden has remained free —though undoubtedly he remains closely watched by Russian security services. But he, too, has been indicted for violating the Espionage Act. Snowden’s personal saga is not over yet. And the recipients of his leaks have promised there are still more leaks to come.


Newsmakers of 2013: Edward Snowden

  1. It is telling that the heroes of our time are despised by their governments.

    • Yep, he broke the biggest rule of them all and why governemtn people are paid so well…

      He told the people the unabridged raw truth. As our current politics is based on deception, lies, and deceiving people out of their money.

  2. “Change you can believe in” has proven no more than a catchy campaign meme.

    • If it came from Snowden most likely would be believable..

  3. Politicians hate the truth and open information…

    ….it shows how crooked and deceptive they are.

    Me, I am hoping Assange and Snowdon get free passage and vindictive US politicians get denied their vengeance.

  4. TIME magazine’s selection of Pope Francis over Edward Snowden is a joke, on the same FAIL scale as the awarding of a Nobel Peace prize to Obama.

    • Media has huge influences coming from governments. I wouldn’t even doubt someone in DC influenced TIME. CBC is owned by Ottawa. No coincidence.

      Last thing corrupt governemtn wants is Snowdon to get positive media for telling the truth.

  5. Later modern history scholars will have a footnote of Mr Snowden’s Moscow airport stopover, when the turning point – or hinge point – will have it that the long term plan was then hatched to make the leaks an ongoing, painfully embarrassing affair, not to his Russian hosts, but the deceitful, devious and odious NSA and their oversighting senators and congresspersons. True patriots can only quietly cheer on the side.

  6. The truth is a great deoderent, and the government despises the truth. See the New Yorker article by Ryan Lizza with substantive comments from Senator Ron Wyden in which he documents the many lies told by government officials. The lies are justified by legal opinions from dishonorable government lawyers who will accommodate their superiors. Obama allows the bureaucrats to set policy, and if it is “legal” then it is ok with Barry.

  7. I wish that Mclean’s would do a poll to see who supports this man….I certainly do….I can’t wait for the new leaks!! Down with Obama!!

  8. Yep, exposing the truth shows how innately corrupt the US government has become.

    And for government, the worst thing you can do is tell the public the unabridged raw truth.

    You need not look for more than Obama’s response to Assange, Brown and Snowdon to know that our governments are morally and ethically corrupt to the core. Its about power, greed and deception to the public.

    I will even go further to say, the US election was rigged, Harvard economics won before the ballots were printed. Not one option for less governemtn, more efficent government and more honest government in Canada or the USA.

    Even in Alberta we have UN-NWO Nenshi, and UN-Federalist Redford brought in with back room money support to manage us. We no longer manage governemtn for us, we are now managed by governemtn for the back room corrupt.

    But it isn’t democracy when less governemtn picking your pocket isn’t even on any ballot in the land, its a rigged ruse, an illusion to placate people.

    And why the west is failing in economics, just too much corruption. Like the Roman Empire, empires rise, then they fail from corruption. Just more debt for the grand kids anyone?

  9. More people than ever before now realize how corrupt our governments have become. Its been a year of progress.

  10. A muslim, a socialist, a communist and an epic liar walk into a bar.
    The bartender says hello Mr. President.

    • let me guess, the Bartender was Snowden.

  11. Heroes of the people, are always persecuted by the Governments that veil themselves in deceptive lies against their own people.
    Most especially, when those said Governments are “unveiled” for the people, by that individual.
    …look what happened to Lennon, and all he did was preach against Vietnam, and yet he represented something the Gov’t didn’t want to face -the Truth.

    This though, is something so much more dangerously bigger than anyone can imagine.

    Ok, I can understand, for example, if the NSA,…, had everything it has now, prior to 911, it might have been able to prevent that disaster. I get that.

    But, did the NSA, the Gov’t, including ours, and the “Corporations”(who’re obviously in bed with them all), honestly think about what would happen if this deepest of mined-data on everyone gets in the wrong hands ? be it internal, or external ?
    It would destroy whole economies, it could drain our bank accounts in a split second, it could destroy lives, countries, …, on a scale that couldn’t even be imagined. I mean comon’, you don’t need a degree in bean-counting just to figure that out.
    Maybe that very same thought flashed across Obama’s mind, on the podium when he stammered:
    ” ….a Program run amuck…” ?

    Foreign data-mining to find and stop terrorists is one thing, and even then, if that said foreign country discovers it, it sets an obvious distrustful political precedence, which in itself will hurt ALL people and parties involved.
    BUT, turning those tools,…, against you’re own people, is another matter altogether, and therefore, the people have a constituional right to know, be it America, Canada, or any other country.
    In other words, we need to understand what the NSA,… are doing to us, in case we need to stop “them”, if “they run amuck”.
    I also understand that you can NOT have 100% security, AND 100% freedom.
    But historically, people have died for “freedom”, not “security”.

    Maybe all that, and much more, is at stake here, and this is why Snowden pulled the “veils” back, to force Gov’t and it’s peoples to discuss this, in some honest form or another, to fully understand our consequences, and thus given us this choice, to try to decide, and judge our own future direction. ?
    He, and many other unsung heroes, have definitely made the world aware of it now.

    imho, Snowden deserves the Nobel, for his courageous self-sacrifice