Paul Wells: Justin Trudeau takes questions—all of them -

Justin Trudeau takes questions—all of them

Paul Wells on Trudeau’s efforts at political theatre, which aimed to highlight the merits of a weekly PM’s Questions session

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau answers a question during Question Period in the House of Commons in Ottawa, Wednesday, April 5, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau answers a question during Question Period in the House of Commons in Ottawa, Wednesday, April 5, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Good for the prime minister for taking questions from every MP who had one in Question Period on Wednesday. He has proposed a single weekly PM’s Questions during which he’d be the only person to take questions from the Opposition. It’s modelled on the way the Brits do it. The opposition understands the unspoken rest of the offer, which is that the PM would feel free to skip the rest of the week’s Question Periods if he liked. They’re pretty sure they don’t like it.

Rather than argue the point, Justin Trudeau decided to play Show Me, Don’t Tell Me. He took every question (except one the increasingly frustrated NDP finally put to one of their own, Daniel Blaikie, because he’s vice-chair of a Commons committee and so is empowered to take questions if anyone thinks to ask him one). Because Trudeau is fond of the element of surprise, nobody knew this little display of derring-do was coming. (I sure didn’t; I’m piecing this all together from the day’s rush transcript, known as the Blues, because I wasn’t watching as it happened.) The effect was like the legendary day in 1962 when Duke Ellington took his band into the studio and kept calling the same soloist, tenor saxophonist Paul Gonsalves, on tune after tune. OK, it wasn’t much like that, but I just love that story. Even Gonsalves didn’t know he’d be the star that day. It’s such a great album.

MORE: Canada’s House of Commons doesn’t need to be modernized

Anyway. It took several minutes before anyone twigged to what Trudeau was up to. By the time he was done, he’d taken questions on an impressive array of topics. A partial list:

• Chemical attacks against civilians in Syria

• Kurdish and Iraqi warnings in 2015 that Trudeau would be wrong to withdraw CF-18 fighters from Syria and Iraq

• Big bonuses for Bombardier bigwigs boosted by the big fed bailout

• The very rule changes Trudeau was dramatizing with his solo turn at the plate

• Criminal records for pot users arrested while awaiting legalization

• Softwood lumber

• Brian Mulroney’s special guest appearance as the government’s conduit to the Trump administration

• Stelco cutting health benefits in Hamilton

• And what have we: access-to-information reform, Manitoba floods, the sputtering Phoenix pay system, the 100th anniversary of the Battle of Vimy Ridge (a lob from the Liberal benches, natch), autism, and environmental assessment.

I ran into a Liberal staffer afterward who was chuffed at the breadth of topics the boss had fielded. Who’s “Just Not Ready” now, huh? Huh? And Trudeau was careful to keep his sunny you-know-whats in full view, thanking opposition MPs for even the grumpiest questions and proclaiming, ad nauseam, his eagerness to work with them in solving the nation’s vexing challenges.

None of this is to say he was like the computer in Star Trek, magically spitting out precise replies to any question. Much of the time his answers amounted to wheel-spinning.

Why does he seem intent on pushing through his own plan for changes to parliamentary rules, rather than collaborating on something more consensual? “I’m very eager to work with them precisely to ensure this place better serves Canadians throughout the country,” he said in French, “while better serving our citizens and our fellow citizens.”

John Ivison, in the National Post, has written memorably that to be on the receiving end of this mode of discourse “is like being flogged with warm lettuce.” At times Trudeau’s treatment verged on self-flagellation. Why is Stelco being allowed to cut health benefits while racking up tidy profits in Hamilton? “The issue of steel is one that has come up many times,” the PM said gamely, in the manner of a student padding an essay question.

At another point he was asked about Jennifer Stebbing, a failed Liberal candidate who found herself on the Hamilton Port Authority. Trudeau, perhaps alone in the room, thought this was an excellent moment to congratulate himself on his government’s “merit-based system” for appointments, one that’s “particularly necessary after too long of successive governments choosing favouritism over objective qualities.”

Oh my. Another MP tried again. The port authority job listing called for candidates with “extensive experience related to the operation of a port.” Stebbing is an estate planner; her firm’s website says she specializes in “ensuring her clients’ wishes are respected after they pass away.”

To borrow a term from francophone political reporters, Trudeau decided to play another cassette. “We have had extraordinary diversity,” he said of his objective-quality-based appointment system. “We have had tremendous Indigenous appointments across this country.” Stebbing’s is, uh, not among them.

At yet another point, I believe I heard the prime minister break some news. He was being nagged about the transit tax credit, which the Conservatives introduced and he has axed. He said it wasn’t working, and he’d rather spend money on building public transit “whether it’s the REM”—the ambitious light-rail system that the Caisse de dépôt wants to build around Montreal—”or the SRB in Quebec City,” a rapid bus service between Quebec and nearby Lévis. Officially, the feds haven’t decided to support either project.

It’s perhaps unsurprising that Trudeau’s clearest answer is one I don’t think he meant to give. He’s from the “Thanks for your question, here’s my line” school of parliamentarians. He could actually save himself some effort and his opponents a few blown gaskets by answering the odd question directly and simply. Both Jean Chrétien and Stephen Harper, champion obfuscators when they needed to be, could sometimes serve up a straight answer. Chrétien was fond of a one-word “Yes” or “No” when it suited. Both weren’t shy about saying they would never do what their opponents suggested — or that they already had. To do that, you need to hear a question as a question, not as a cue to deliver the next prepped homily.

More broadly, I wish we could discuss the reasons why a weekly PM’s questions works for the Brits and may help here. One is that the goal is to reduce the ridiculously inflated significance that politicians, their staffs and journalists attach to Question Period, squatting as it does across the middle of the workday like a bloated and lazy procedural toad, sucking up energy, giving so little in return. Another is that if there’s one day for the PM, there could be designated other days for teams of other ministers with related files, again as there is in Britain: Economic Ministers’ Questions on Tuesday, Social Ministers on Wednesday, or whatever. This would reduce buck-passing, in theory.

But you see what I did there? I proposed some ideas, defended them, and now I’m awaiting responses. That’s what a conversation looks like. Twice on Wednesday, Trudeau was asked to reassure MPs that what he wants is a conversation, rather than an expedited list of Liberal-approved reforms despite any objections from united opposition parties. Twice he refused to give that reassurance. When a man spends an hour talking, the silences can be as eloquent as the noise.


Justin Trudeau takes questions—all of them

  1. And the answers is ….
    Ah … we will … ah … make decisions … ah that will ah. … benefit all … ah …. Canadians … ah …

  2. Blackadder III – I’ve got a plan so cunning you could stick a tail on it and call it a weasel.

  3. Maybe a journalist should have the cajunas to give Trudeau at least a little credit for doing this. Can you even imagine Harper doing it? But no, they criticize everything and anything. Some questions are just not answerable and they know it. It is sad but I now know and understand why previous leaders like Harper didn’t want to deal with the media. (and I didn’t even like Harper!) Journalists are losing credibility because they seem to be just about ratings.

    • Harper was a very articulate speaker. The surfer dude should get some lessons from him.

  4. The CPC seems to not have gotten the memo – you are no longer in charge; likewise, the NDP seems to have not gotten the memo – you are not the official opposition (in any case, Tom Mulcair would likely want to see the return of fisticuffs to parliamentary debate)(in any case, watching him foam at the mouth on camera is tiring). The CPC’s position seems a little confusing as their former choice for PM only showed up 1/3rd of the time tailing of to 27% in later days and only rising to nearly 50% still later when he had nothing else to do. The CPC stance on Fridays is equally confusing as their current party leader rarely finds it worth showing up (perhaps she’s too busy adding up her 2/3 of a million dollar annual expense account, having made a point of racking up as much travel as possible). But no party is golden as the attendance of their leaders for question period is never more than 60%. However, one can see the difficulty: Rona and Justin’s concurrent attendance at QP comes down to 1 out of 5 while Justin need face the fulminations of red Tom on 1 out of 4 occasions: no wonder one has a dim view of the others attendance when they’re playing parliamentary hide and seek with each other. Perhaps the CPC could publish a book “Where is Rona” (hint don’t look in the chicken dinner in Come by Chance nor the petro dinner in Calgary – the challenge will be great as her travel spending in one year is more than that of one season of Amazing Race Canada).

  5. Then they wonder why people are walking away from Politicians and politics and don’t vote. Trudeau a former drama teacher is very good at acting and playing the role of PM. QP is theatre but it would be nice from time to time for us taxpayers to hear him say something that make sense and is not another tirade. Sunny ways disappoint mightily.

    • When Trudeau’s thoughts are scripted, they are so contrived they sound like something from Hamlet and when they’re not scripted, he is almost unintelligible. Just 32 months to go!!

  6. Dear God I truly hope the author of this article at least gets some kind of pay for the “non-biased” reporting of our PM’s struggle to appear intelligent. What a complete and utter fool to believe that any answer he deems will suit comes out of that mouth whether it pertains to the question or not. Please, we paid for cardboard cutouts, would someone please put that in the seat and call it a day.

  7. Only in Canada under the Trudeau government would a Prime Minister actually answering questions in the House of Commons be counted as news.