Liberal MPs, Muslim community face verbal attacks over M-103

The controversial non-binding motion put forward by the Liberals caused anti-Muslim backlash



OTTAWA – Canada’s Muslim community felt the embrace of an outpouring of support Friday in the wake of stinging personal attacks against a member of Parliament who sponsored a motion to condemn and combat Islamophobia, even as negative reaction to the Liberal-backed proposition appeared to escalate.

Heritage Minister Melanie Joly, who this week fronted the Liberal party’s blessing of the motion, known as M-103, was met by expletive-laced condemnation on social media from outraged Canadians.

Joly’s Facebook account was peppered with derogatory, sexually demeaning and threatening messages.

“No offence but I’m so sick of all you white Liberals selling your (expletive) for Islam,” one post read.

Others made denigrating remarks about Muslims.

RELATED: Liberals back motion condemning Islamophobia

As the online vitriol was being unleashed, images emerged on Twitter of a short-lived anti-Muslim protest outside Masjid Toronto showing demonstrators being watched by police as they carried signs reading “Ban Islam” and Muslims are terrorists.” No one at the mosque could be immediately reached for comment.

The comments aimed at Joly were typical of those that Iqra Khalid said she had received since she introduced the motion late last year.

The Mississauga, Ont., MP told the House of Commons Thursday she received thousands of sexist comments, Islamophobic remarks and even death threats after bringing M-103 before Parliament.

Khalid read the transcript of one particularly disturbing YouTube video sent to her office in which the author suggested she should be shot. She did not immediately respond to a request for an interview Friday after her office said she had returned to her riding.

Right-wing activists and some Conservative leadership candidates have said they fear the motion could be a precursor to a crackdown on free speech, even though it doesn’t alter the country’s hate speech laws.

Despite the visceral reaction, the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at Canada said individual Canadians and elected officials alike reached out in the 48 hours since the federal Liberals voiced support for Khalid.

Still, spokesman Safwan Choudry said he was troubled by the messages issued to backers of the motion.

“We are troubled, but not surprised,” said Choudry.

“The anti-Muslim sentiment does run deep and does run strong, so that’s why we’re not surprised.”

Choudry questioned the mindset of people who think it’s OK to launch such attacks against elected officials.

“(Khalid) is not just a Muslim, or a woman, but she speaks on behalf of the country,” he said.

RELATED: The Tories approach a point of no return

While Joly called the reaction to her support of the motion “completely unacceptable,” the minister said she decided to ignore the comments directed at her, and instead would try to prevent more messages from being posted, and work with social media companies to see what actions could be taken to curb abusive language online.

“We must be careful not to tolerate any form of abuse,” she told reporters outside the Commons.

“So what I do I block them, that’s all.”

Choudry said he was concerned that the uproar over the motion, combined with the Jan. 29 mosque shooting in Quebec City, will tarnish Canada’s international reputation as an open and inclusive society.

“We hope it doesn’t taint the image and reputation that Canada has built worldwide,” he said, adding that recent images of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau welcoming Syrian refugees with open arms have been cemented in the minds of people across the globe, particularly in Muslim countries.

Muslims in Canada are grateful for the outpouring of positive sentiment and support from people across the country in reaction to the Quebec terrorist attack, the Canadian Muslim Forum said in a statement urging Parliament to adopt M-103.

Still, public awareness campaigns should be developed to counter misconceptions about Islam, the organization said, warning that hate speech and rhetoric, if left unchecked, could create a breeding ground for fear and violence.

“Muslim women and girls are most often the target of harassment and discrimination that can be labelled as incidents of Islamophobia,” said forum president Samer Majzoub.


Liberal MPs, Muslim community face verbal attacks over M-103

  1. Look at Paris, look at most of Europe. Look at what is really going on. Don’t tell us that we have to keep our mouths shut.

    • LOL another frightened white guy.

    • You have every right to say you disagree with Islam. You have every right to say you hate ISIS and any of it supporters. You don’t have a right to direct hate at all Muslims and make them targets. That’s the problem here – too many people claiming they just want to express an opinion about a religion, when what they really want is to force all Muslims out of the country by any means necessary.

  2. Yeah, big tough white guys go after women and children…..and over nothing

    Seriously…..not cool

  3. Funny how the Liberal party and Muslim lobbying groups didn’t feel the need for any federal government action to help deal with rising Kafirphobia in Muslim communities after the attempted Islamic terror attacks here, like the Toronto 18 or the attempt last year by Aaron Driver, or for that matter the successful attack at Parliament Hill in 2014. As far as verbal attacks, check out this young lady who writes the blog Nice Mangos. A Pakistani-Canadian ex-Muslim who is very critical of the regressive ideology of Islam, she receives tons of death threats and abuse. Those death threats are of course very credible, we’ve seen in the past what has happened to people like Theo Van Gogh and the people at Charlie Hebdo. Again, what is the federal government doing to stem the tide of Kafirphobia and Apostatephobia in the Muslim community?

    • LOL oh so it’s okay for us to be nasty to Muslims, but not for Muslims to be nasty to us.

      Works both ways John

      • If it works both ways, why is the Liberal party only tabling a motion for the one way? Why are they only looking to use the power of the federal government to lessen “Islamophobia” (which is still a pretty vague concept) and not Kafirphobia?

        • I don’t know why they’re doing it at all…..our constitution says the same thing, and applies to everyone.

          And enough with the ‘Kafirphobia Name-calling is another silly concept.