7

A reality check on Stephen Harper’s math: ‘Ka-ching.’

Joan Bryden explains why Stephen Harper’s tax equations don’t always add up


 
Conservative Leader Stephen Harper speaks during a campaign stop at Global Systems Emissions Inc., in Whitby, Ont., on Tuesday, October 6, 2015. (Nathan Denette/CP)

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper speaks during a campaign stop at Global Systems Emissions Inc., in Whitby, Ont., on Tuesday, October 6, 2015. (Nathan Denette/CP)

OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Stephen Harper played game show host Monday to demonstrate the thousands of dollars Conservatives claim would be taken from the average family’s pocket if Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau were to win power on Oct. 19.

To the constant “ka-ching, ka-ching” chirp of a cash register, Nicole Ropp, a married mother of three, piled up $20 bills as Harper rhymed off a list of a purported tax increases Canadians can expect from a Liberal government. For the Ropp family, it all added up to about $8,000, according to Harper.

However, Harper’s list included a number of alleged tax hikes that aren’t on the Liberal agenda and omitted a number of other measures aimed at giving middle-class families more, not less, money.

What Harper said:

A Liberal government would limit contributions to Tax-Free Savings Accounts.

What Liberals are promising:

This is correct. Liberals would cap the annual amount Canadians can sock away in TFSAs at $5,500, rolling back the Harper government’s recent increase to $10,000. Liberals maintain increasing the cap would benefit primarily the wealthy.

What Harper said:

Liberals would “cancel child care cheques for some families … That’s nearly $2,000 per year per child under the age of six and over $700 for children between 6 and 17 — gone.” For the Ropp family, he said that would amount to a loss of $3,360 per year.

What Liberals are promising:

Harper didn’t mention that the Liberals are proposing to replace the Conservatives’ existing universal child care benefit with a new monthly, tax-free child benefit. Liberals maintain their benefit would give more money to 90 per cent of Canadian families than they currently receive. However, the benefit would be gradually phased out for those earning more than $150,000.

RELATED: This or that? See where you stand this election with the Maclean’s Policy Face-Off Machine

What Harper said:

Liberals would eliminate the tax advantage enjoyed by couples with children by allowing them to split their income for tax purposes.

What Liberals are promising:

This is correct. Trudeau has promised to scrap income splitting for parents, pointing to studies which have shown the benefits flow primarily to the wealthiest 15 per cent of families. Contrary to Conservative attack ads which infer that Liberals would also scrap income splitting for seniors, Trudeau has repeatedly said he’d keep that tax advantage in place.

What Harper said:

Liberals would make $6.5 billion in cuts to tax credits and deductions in order to balance their budget in the fourth year of a first mandate. Among other things, the child fitness credit, the children’s art credit and the volunteer firefighter tax credit are all “likely on the table.”

What Liberals are promising:

As part of their plan to find $6.5 billion in savings, the Liberals have promised to review boutique tax credits and deductions that have multiplied like topsy over recent years, with an eye to reducing benefits that unfairly go to those earning more than $200,000 a year. They have not identified which tax benefits could be cut, other than to propose a cap on stock option deductions.

As for the specific credits Harper predicted would be cut, Trudeau said Monday: “We’re not going to be cutting those tax credits.”

Not all the Liberals’ anticipated savings would come from cutting tax credits and deductions. Other savings would come from a promised crack down on tax evasion, reducing the government’s advertising budget and reducing the use of external consultants.

What Harper said:

Liberals would increase payroll taxes by hiking Employment Insurance premiums.

What Liberals are promising: Liberals are promising to reduce EI premiums in 2017 from $1.88 per $100 of insurable earnings to $1.65. That is not as steep a cut as that promised by Harper — to $1.49 by 2017 — but it’s still a reduction.

What Harper didn’t say:

He didn’t mention that the Liberals are promising to cut taxes across the board for Canadians earning between $45,000 and $90,000, tax relief Trudeau says is worth up to $670 per person, per year. Nor did Harper mention that Trudeau is also promising to hike taxes on the wealthiest one per cent of Canadians.


 

A reality check on Stephen Harper’s math: ‘Ka-ching.’

  1. You know, the more I read about this Harper fellow, the more I think he might not always be telling the truth…

  2. “equations doesn’t”? How about equation doesn’t or equations don’t?

  3. This is the story of Harpers campaign. Questionable math followed by big lies.

    The only lies that Harper did not make was his promise to make Canada a much more suspicious country.

    In other words if you vote for Harper economically you will be left out, but at least you get to turn in your neighbour. Nice vision.

  4. And not a single comment on how the NDP reacted? You sound like a Liberal shill, Maclean’s.

  5. When was the last time Harper went shopping – cash registers haven’t sounded like that for decades.

  6. I received a dubious call yesterday from the “Voter Outreach Center”, representing the Conservative Party. They had my name and address on their list, and I have no idea how they acquired it. The “Voter Outreach Center” is the same name Harper used in the 2011 call scandals. I suspect the call I received was illegal. If it was – well, one more reason not to vote for Harper.

Sign in to comment.