2

Chrystia Freeland ‘still hopeful’ on Canada-EU trade deal

Canada’s trade minister says the ball on CETA is ‘in Europe’s court’


 
n this Tuesday, Sept. 20, 2016 file photo, protestors hold an Anti-CETA banner during a demonstration against international trade agreements in Brussels.  (AP Photo/Virginia Mayo, FIle)

n this Tuesday, Sept. 20, 2016 file photo, protestors hold an Anti-CETA banner during a demonstration against international trade agreements in Brussels. (AP Photo/Virginia Mayo, FIle)

OTTAWA – International Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland says she’s still hopeful that a Canada-EU trade deal can still be salvaged, but “the ball is in Europe’s court.”

With the agreement — known as the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement — seemingly on life support, Freeland emerged today in Ottawa to say she believes it can still be salvaged.

She also defended her decision last week to walk out on the talks in Brussels, calling it a “strong action” that had “the desired results.”

“Canada’s job is done,” Freeland told a hastily assembled news conference in the foyer of the House of Commons.

“For us this is an excellent agreement … Canada is ready to sign CETA, but the ball is in Europe’s court…. We wish them well and we hope that we can get there.”

The comments came shortly after the European Union also expressed optimism that a deal can still be reached.

The EU said that they haven’t given up yet on a summit in Brussels that’s scheduled for this Thursday, which is when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was hoping to be overseas to sign the landmark free-trade agreement.

MORE: Maclean’s politics podcast discusses the free-trade agreement and more

Trudeau spoke by telephone today with EU President Donald Tusk, who says “there’s yet time” to find a way to convince a Belgian region to back the deal.

Without all regions of Belgium supporting the agreement, the country cannot sign. The EU needs unanimity from all of its 28 member states.

“We think Thursday’s summit still possible,” Tusk said in a Twitter message. “We encourage all parties to find a solution.”

The sudden optimism on both sides came as something of a surprise, since the Belgian region of Wallonia has said it has too many concerns with the pact to overcome by Thursday.

The EU’s inability to sign would be a major embarrassment and undermine the belief that the world’s biggest trading bloc is a trustworthy partner as it seeks similar deals with nations like the United States and Japan.

Prospects for a signing ceremony looked as good as dead on Monday afternoon when Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel admitted he could not get unanimity amid Belgium’s half dozen regions and legislatures.

“We have been asked to give a clear answer today” on whether Belgium could sign up as the last of 28 member states, Michel said after meeting with Wallonia leader Paul Magnette. “And the clear answer, at this stage, is no.”

Even though Michel is eager to sign the deal, Belgium’s byzantine constitutional setup means every single region in the country needs to back it, not only the national government. As a result, opposition from a region of 3.5 million could now nix a deal between over 500 million EU citizens and 35 million Canadians.

The EU’s executive commission called for patience in an attempt to save the free trade deal and had already dismissed a Monday night deadline as counterproductive.

Magnette insisted he would agree to nothing under the threat of an ultimatum but remained open to further talks.

“Each time they put forward such an ultimatum it makes a serene discussion and a democratic debate impossible,” he said. “I indicated that other parallel political contacts are still going on and that we could give counter proposals.”

The EU Commission, which has negotiated the deal on behalf of the 28 nations, insisted that this week’s summit was not the final deadline.

“Now, we need patience,” EU Commission spokesman Margaritis Schinas said. “The Commission traditionally does not set deadlines or ultimatums.”

Andre Antoine, the head of the Wallonia legislature, said, “No, it will not be possible” to back the deal on Monday, arguing there were too many outstanding issues.

Even if Thursday’s EU-Canada summit has to be called off, it could always be rescheduled when Wallonia has signed on to the agreement, Schinas indicated.

Over the past week, Belgium missed two deadlines that the EU had set to agree to the deal and Canada briefly walked out of the trade talks before returning the next day.

Politicians in Wallonia, which is smaller than the U.S. state of New Jersey, argue that the proposed accord would undermine labour, environment and consumer standards.

Proponents say it would yield billions in added trade through tariff cuts and other measures to lower barriers to commerce. At the same time, the EU says it will keep in place the region’s strong safeguards on social, environmental and labour issues.

Magnette said a key hurdle was the issue of “private arbitration” in which multinationals can legally challenge governments on policies.

He said Wallonia a better deal would bolster EU standards and set a strong precedent for other trade talks between Europe and trading partners like the United States or Japan. The trade talks with the U.S. in particular have run into huge resistance in Europe, drawing public protests.

— With files from The Associated Press


 
Filed under:

Chrystia Freeland ‘still hopeful’ on Canada-EU trade deal

  1. This is really high stakes because when the Libs got power they said the deal was all but dead in the water, suggesting they would be the ones to resurrect it. Now they haven’t done any better than the Cons and Canada apparently isn’t back. No wonder Freeland got teary. Poor Chrisytia. Don’t worry about it. Dion didn’t do any better with the UN security council regarding Syria and Russia’s ever repeating veto. Funny how the PM doesn’t show up. The buck does stop with him.

  2. I can’t understand Chrystia’s hopefulness. Despite what Canadians are being told, nothing that we hold sacred from Medicare to human rights is outside the purview of appeal for redress from business and corporate interests which feel that they may be depriving them of profit or opportunity. We may not be forced to change our laws, but we will have to pay foreign interests should our laws be found to interfere with their business.

    By the same token all those things that we would like to see in that ‘even playing field’ of free trade are there, but only as suggestions for improvement with no practical redress for those who choose to make, or keep their side of the playing field a little more competitive through diminished wages, lower taxes or lack of labor rights. This may increase trade but it can, and will, beggar some Canadians. And the TIPP is even worse.

Sign in to comment.