Elizabeth May vs. Northern Gateway - Macleans.ca

Elizabeth May vs. Northern Gateway


The Green MP has posted her submission to the Northern Gateway review.

The proponent has violated its social licence to operate through a culture of negligence. This failing is well-documented in the report of the United States National Transportation Safety Board  (Enbridge Incorporated, Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Rupture and Release, Marshall Michigan, July 25, 2010, Accident Report NTSB/PAR-12/01, PB2012-916501, July 10, 2012).  The spills and pipeline leaks in Kalamazoo, Michigan in 2010 and additional spill in the summer of 2012 in Wisconsin are ample evidence of the corporate culture of Enbridge being negligent. The panel is commended for accepting the report of the US. NTSB into evidence.  As evidence before this panel, the litany of failures in preventing the Kalamazoo spill and subsequent negligence in ignoring alarms and pumping more bitumen-diluent mix into a broken pipeline must lead to a rejection of this proposal at this time.


Elizabeth May vs. Northern Gateway

  1. Enbridge talking about their pipeline safety is about as convincing as Clint Eastwood talking to an empty chair.

    • They also seem to be under the misapprehension that they know something about super tankers travelling in restricted and reliably stormy waters too. Personally i wouldn’t trust them to know a neap from a spring tide.