Everybody's a critic: Budget 2012 reactions, partisan and otherwise - Macleans.ca

Everybody’s a critic: Budget 2012 reactions, partisan and otherwise


Thomas Mulcair sounded sure of himself reacting to today’s federal budget for the first time as NDP leader. But Mulcair’s main line of attack, his claim that the budget contains “reckless cuts” to Old Age Security and health care, could be difficult to sustain. While Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s speech in Davos led to speculation that OAS was in for deep, wrenching cuts, the 2012 budget announces that the age of eligibility for the benefit will be gradually raised to 67 from the current 65 starting in 2023. As for health care, Flaherty told the provinces late last year he’ll be trimming annual growth in health transfers to about four per cent from the current six per cent year hike, but not until 2017-18. So those are two modest restraint measures that won’t be imposed for a long time. Even Mulcair will have trouble keeping up political pressure on changes so far off.

Bob Rae, the interim (at least for now) Liberal leader, directed his fire first and foremost on the budget’s  failure to stimulate employment. “After Canada experienced zero job growth during the last six months, we expected this budget to have one focus – jobs,” Rae said. Again, it’s hard to see this as an easy political winner. While the budget isn’t big on jobs, Flaherty can point to a handful of moves—$205 million to extend a hiring tax credit for small business, another $50 million over two years for youth employment, and $74 million for a pilot project to make sure Employment Insurance recipients who accept work while on EI won’t see their benefits cut by as much as they earn. These are niche programs, but not negligible ones, and will make it harder for Rae to claim the government is doing absolutely zilch on the job front.

Beyond the House of Commons, reaction on specific budget measures included the Canadian Media Guild protesting the move to cut CBC’s budget by 10 per cent, or $115 million less for the public broadcaster in 2015, down from the $1.1 billion it got from the government this year.

From quite a different perspective, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation complains that Flaherty’s spending cuts “are a drop in the bucket.” The federation says the budget will not balance the budget by 2014-15, as Harper once promised. Indeed, the budget cautiously projects no surplus until 2015-16, although RBC Economics, among other private forecasters, suggests the deficit is on track to be eliminated a year earlier, consistent with Harper’s previous pledge.

The Sierra Club of Canada protests that the budget’s plan to speed up environmental reviews of resource projects—including the controversial Northern Gateway pipeline through British Columbia—will “result in weaker environmental assessments and projects being approved without a full understanding of the social, economic and environmental impacts they will have.” There’s little chance the Harper government, increasingly defined by the way it champions the energy sector, will be open to persuasion on this one. But the budget took note of “overlapping federal and provincial regulatory requirements and processes that require a high degree of coordination.” So how far can Ottawa go to streamline reviews without coaxing the provinces on-side? Officials in the budget lock-up for journalists flatly declined to discuss that very pertinent issue.

The Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters, a key business lobby group, was sharply critical of the budget’s plan for changing Scientific Research and Experimental Development tax credits. The credit is going to be enriched for smaller companies, but overall the changes will, according to the CME, cut $1.3 billion out of tax support for business innovation from 2014 to 2016. Flaherty seems determined to shift emphasis from the broadly available tax credits to more targeted government support for innovative companies, a thrust recommended in software executive Tom Jenkins’ report on the issue for the government last year.


Everybody’s a critic: Budget 2012 reactions, partisan and otherwise

  1. Patience, little butterflies. Budgets come (at least) once a year. The potential for
    wreaking havoc remains.
    Of course, if M. Mulcair really doesn’t like the OAS changes, he could pledge to
    reverse them after the next election. He should.

    • Except that Quebec has done the same thing with the QPP, so at least half of his base doesn’t care.

  2. A budget nobody likes….amazing.

  3. Rae is still as economically clueless as when he was premier of Ontario.

    Canada’s job growth has been slow because the government and Bank of Canada is withdrawing Canada from artificial stimulus slowly and appropriately to get back to private sector led job and economic growth.

    Europe has to much austerity in the periphery and UK and too much money-printing (ECB LTRO’s) .  And the United States still has trillion dollar deficits, and money-printing (Fed QE1, QE2, Operation Twist, etc).  US growth is still most artificial and not real.

    Canada is experiencing temporary withdrawal symptoms as we shift from artificial government stimulus led growth back to normal private sector led growth.

    This will kept Canada from getting on a deficit and dept spiral downward to oblivion like is occurring in Europe and the United States.

    • Altogether, I have to give Flaherty credit for being slightly less economically clueless than when he was Finance Minister of Ontario.

      That wasn`t a compliment, by the way.  He`s also less politically clueless than when he ran for leadership of the Ontario conservative party on that criminalize poverty platform.  Still not a compliment.

  4. I’m just hearing there is a 7 1/2 million budget cut to Elections Canada – this year.

    • Exactly.  Now why would the Harper government cut from Elections Canada?  I wonder …

      • Because they are toothless when it comes to Opposition infractions,  maybe? Why haven’t the LPC leadership candidates had any consequences for not repaying their debts? A CLEAR, undeniable break of the funding rules.

  5. Harper budget eliminates national ecoENERGY Retrofit (devastates
    energy savings industry)

    In Budget 2012, Prime Minister Stephen Harper failed to renew the federal
    ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes program. This will result in reduced levels of
    energy conservation, and immediate job losses in every Canadian community.

    Just because Canada is blessed with energy, doesn’t mean we should waste it.

    Homeowners in provinces that still have some form of provincial home energy
    retrofit incentive program will no longer have the support of the federal
    government’s ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes program.  In Ontario, homeowners get nothing – they no
    longer have access to either a federal or provincial home retrofit incentive

    With Canada poised to invest billions in new energy projects like oil sands,
    nuclear and wind farms, Harper’s actions are devastating.  Hundreds of energy savings companies will be
    forced to downsize, lay off staff, or shut down altogether.

    Energy efficiency should be at the top of Canada’s energy and jobs agenda, not
    the bottom.


    • Federal governement does not not invest in any energy projects and should stop subsdizing all so called green intiatives. If they are good and saving money they don’t need subsidy  if not they should have been cancelled long time ago.

  6. Cutting 115 M of the budget of CBC over 3 years is a sham. This money wasting leftist propaganda organization should have been put on a strict 15% per year diet  and force them to show on what they are spending our money.