In regards to Richard Van Loon’s piece in today’s Citizen, as discussed by our Potter, one question that I would quite sincerely like to see the professor answer: In keeping roughly with the same criteria, how much of what has occurred in Parliament over the last two years would he consider “democratically legitimate?”
In regards to Richard Van Loon’s piece in today’s Citizen, as discussed by our Potter, one question that I would quite sincerely like to see the professor answer: In keeping roughly with the same criteria, how much of what has occurred in Parliament over the last two years would he consider “democratically legitimate?”