"Incredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s" - Macleans.ca
 

“Incredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s”


 

In an article that is making some waves in the U.S., Dinesh D’Souza explains that Barack Obama’s policy choices result from the anticolonialist philosophy of his Kenyan father.

From a very young age and through his formative years, Obama learned to see America as a force for global domination and destruction. He came to view America’s military as an instrument of neocolonial occupation. He adopted his father’s position that capitalism and free markets are code words for economic plunder. Obama grew to perceive the rich as an oppressive class, a kind of neocolonial power within America. In his worldview, profits are a measure of how effectively you have ripped off the rest of society, and America’s power in the world is a measure of how selfishly it consumes the globe’s resources and how ruthlessly it bullies and dominates the rest of the planet.

This makes perfect sense to Newt Gingrich.

Gingrich says that D’Souza has made a “stunning insight” into Obama’s behavior — the “most profound insight I have read in the last six years about Barack Obama.”

“What if [Obama] is so outside our comprehension, that only if you understand Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior, can you begin to piece together [his actions]?” Gingrich asks. “That is the most accurate, predictive model for his behavior.”

“This is a person who is fundamentally out of touch with how the world works, who happened to have played a wonderful con, as a result of which he is now president,” Gingrich tells us.

UPDATE: David Frum is not pleased. I really believe that on issues like this, David shows his roots in Upper Canadian conservatism of the 1980s, a conservatism that was, and remains, highly uncomfortable with the Pat Buchanan culture-war posturing that now defines North American partisan conservatism:

Why do Forbes (which presumably has many choices of cover material) and Gingrich imagine that such a message will resonate with their conservative audience? Nothing more offends conservatives than liberal accusations of racial animus. Yet here is racial animus, unconcealed and unapologetic, and it is seized by savvy editors and an ambitious politician as just the material to please a conservative audience. That’s an insult to every conservative in America.


 

Comments are closed.